Saturday, April 8, 2017

Pamela Anderson endorses Julian Assange

The Salon is reporting that Pamela Anderson isn’t doing a great job hiding her budding romance. Although she still won’t technically admit dating WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, she has quickly become his staunchest public defender. “Julian is trying to free the world by educating it. It is a romantic struggle - I love him for this,” Anderson told People. “I understand that our ‘affair’ and the curiosity surrounding that might bring some attention to his situation. That’s fine, but I’d rather not go into private details. Let’s just say everyone deserves love.”

All the other media outlets appear to be reporting on the interview Pamela Anderson gave about Julian in People magazine. Their reltionship even made the Rolling Stone magazine.

Now I'm certainly not going to trash Pamela Anderson. After all, she is from Vancouver. One might question some of her past relationships but ours is not to wonder why. We've all made mistakes in that area. Her promoting Julian Assange is something that I would like to address.

I'm going to highlight the differences and the similarities between Julian Assange and Edward Snowden. Whenever I have discussed Edward Snowden in the past, I have pointed out how his case is different from that of Julian Assange. It's not that I have anything against Julian, I admire and respect him. I just want to clarify how they are different for the vultures ready to lynch them.

Edward Snowden is a whistleblower. He reported illegal activity and instead of arresting the people who committed the crimes he reported, the lunatics accuse him of treason. That shows you how far astray the world has fallen from protecting civl liberty and the US Constitution.

Julian Assange is also a whistleblower but his case goes one step further and reveals military or state secrets. That crosses over into a grey area. All Edward Snowden did was simply say the NSA are breaking he law and lied to congress. He didn't reveal any military secrets. Was that a state secret? Perhaps but hiding a crime is unlawful. Wanting to try Edward Snowden for treason because he did his civic duty is astounding. The same applies to Julian Assange.

One of the first things Wikileaks revelaed that stands out in my mind was a videoclip of US Military in Iraq launching an attack on a suspected terrorist and taking out a group of civilians at the same time. It was the same old judge jury and executioner all at once. Yes this was a military secret but what they did was wrong and unlawful.

More recently he leaked out hacked e-mail from Hillary Clinton that once again showed unlawful activity. Most damaging wikileaks dot com is reporting that "10 years ago, WikiLeaks became famous for exposing elements of the Bush administration and the Iraq wars, and quickly became heroes to the left. This year, Hillary Clinton is being exposed because of the unprecedented levels of corruption throughout her history. Julian Assange, who is not necessarily pro-Trump, has stated that if any controversial Trump material is found, it will be published. However, everything controversial they have has already been said by Trump himself, according to Assange."

The Hillary Clinton hacked e-mail leak was almost too much information. There were so many e-mail it was hard to sort through them all. The most important revelations in those e-mail that the media missed or simply refused to report on was Hillary Clinton's involvement with arms dealing and drug trafficking. It also implicated Obama. Hillary Clinton was the author of Operation Fast and Furious where they were selling guns to the Mexican cartel and bringing back tons of cocaine into the US as payment. Obama knew about it and used executive privilege to hide that.

Personally, I liked Obama. I thought he was way better than George Bush. I think in some ways he conned us. The CIA were the ones that paid for his education so he most certainly didn't want to rock their boat and disrupt their arms dealing and drug trafficking network. Some could argue he didn't have a choice and that if he didn't hide Hillary Clinton's involvement with Operation Fast and Furious he would have ended up dead like JFK for vetoing Operation Northwoods.

Julian Assange also revealed that the Clinton foundation profited directly from arming ISIS. The mainstream media barely mentioned that highly significant fact. Which leads us to ask who is really controlling the mainstream media anyways? Those are two pretty important facts not to report on. I do have one comparison on how Edward Snowden and Julian Assange are similar.

In the movie about Edward Snowden it claimed his girlfriend Lindsey Mills was a pole dancer. At first I thought that was just holywood try to sex up the story. Evidently, that part was true. So now Pamela Anderson shows up helping to spice up Julian Assange's image. I wish them well.


  1. ... address this, Please!

    1. Interesting. Building six is somewhat more ambiguous than the third tower. The third tower is very obviously a controlled demolition. It's hard to say what happened to building six.

  2. If you look at what group profited the most imediately after 911, and the people who are associated with that group everything will fall into place.Its not a puzzle just follow where the 400 billion that Goerge Congress to approve to fight war on terror.wake up America all the answers are do obvious!