Napoleon Dynamite joins K Town IS

Hey now, you're a rock star. This guy's gang sign is a finger and a thumb on his forehead: www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ebuxyxptAo Here's Don McWhirter aka Blaze from Kelowna wearing an IS shirt.

Wait a minute. Take a look at the guy. He's got that really stupid bleached frohawk. That's not very gangster. But that's not all. See that stupid grin on his face? He's bragging about belonging to the Independent Soldiers and showing off his weight set in the background.

You have got to be kidding. If you're gonna show off your weights, put more than 50 pounds on the barbell. Come on. All the other IS guys are buff. That is really embarrassing. He certainly isn't the brawn of the group. Let's just say Don McWhirter is a person of interest.

Jamie Bacon: Scapegoat or criminal mastermind?

Take a look at the three bacon brothers. One's a big awkward guy and the other two are small preps. Dennis Karbovanec plead guilty to participating in the Surrey six murder and implicated Jamie Bacon and others yet Jarrod and Jonathan walk away free, again. Jamie's the younger brother. Did the preps sell out their own brother?

Jared and Jonathan have a host of weapons charges against them and have been the targets of several gang shootings wearing body armour and beefing up their leased cars against gunfire. Hardly innocent responsible citizens.

It certainly would not be surprising to hear that a court convicts Jamie Bacon for being involved in the Surrey Six murders. What is surprising is the thought that Jamie was the mastermind and brothers Jonathon and Jarred were not involved in the planning of that murder. How can the brawn be the mastermind when the brains walk away free?

Then there's the conspiracy theory. Original IS members who were anti Hells Angels have been shot or died in car accidents and replaced with Hells Angel friendly puppets. Isn't that ironic?

The photo of Larry Amero and Randy Naicker on the front page of the Vancouver Sun shows an interesting connection. A Hells Angel with a Bacon Brother Associate. Other than the two innocent lives lost, all the targets in the Surrey Six murder were Red Scorpions. Were the bacon brothers, Dennis and Jamie at least, trying to take over the leadership of that group? The old Red Scorpion leadership, the ones who were shot were friends and associates of the UN. Maybe that's why the UN doesn't like the Bacon Brothers. Where's Larry in all this and Matt the Rat?
.

Were they trying to make the Red Scorpions Hells Angel friendly like the new IS? A plot to muscle the UN out of Surrey and replace them with a puppet club? There's something about puppets and puppet masters that just smells bad.

PM has new love for socialists

http://news.ca.msn.com/top-stories/cbc-article.aspx?cp-documentid=21692597 Sounds like sour grapes to me. Ignatiaeff is whining and name calling again. One minute he's complaining that Harper is inflexible unwilling to compromise and listen to any of the other parties in a minority government. Now he's complaining that Harper is listening to the other parties. He's just not listening to him.

Ignatieff had his chance. Dion was ready to lead the coalition. Ignatieff parades in and said no. He decided to form a coalition with Harper instead. Then he starts name calling and announces he's ready to call an election. But he also says he's not willing to form a coalition. How does that make him different from what he claims Harper is? http://ignatieff.me/

How can he form a minority government and not form a coalition? That's what you have to do in a minority government. Iggy's not going to get a majority government. Harper teaming up with the NDP may indeed seem like an unlikely match but there is common ground we can move on and get things done. Just set the extremes on both sides aside and build on common ground. Democracy, free speech and public safety.



I trust Justin Trudeau a lot more than I trust Ignatieff. Pierre Trudeau and Chretchien were nice guys but we need to remember that justice was eroded out of our judicial system from years of Liberal faint hope. Rehabilitation is a good thing but injustice is not. Five years for murder and house arrest for trafficking cocaine for the Hells Angels is offensive. We need to restore justice to the judicial system.

My concerns about the Harper government are counter balanced by the NDP. My concerns about the NDP are counter balanced by the Harper government. I think it's a match made in heaven and Iggy's crying because he's left out in the cold where he should be.

Here's a link from a blog reader. It's more attack adds on Iggy except it appears to be coming from the left. It appears our Igmhotep is being squeezed from both sides. I must admit his blind devotion to torture is somewhat of a real concern: www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uFbREDNfvE

Well, well, well... the Block joins the new coalition. Imagine that. Now Iggy's left in the cold. Now that's justice: http://news.ca.msn.com/top-stories/cbc-article.aspx?cp-documentid=21734289

Hunter S. Thompson and the Hells Angels

This too is very old news but it establishes a pattern. Hunter S. Thompson was a reporter who spent time with the Hells Angels and wrote a book about them called: Hells Angels The Strange and Terrible Saga of the Outlaw Motorcycle Gangs. He too died of a suspicious suicide in 2005.

I find it interesting to note that the precursor to Hunter S. Thompson's book was a article he first published for the Nation called: The Motorcycle Gangs. Losers and Outsiders. www.thenation.com/doc/19650517/thompson

It appeared in the May 17 1965 edition of the Nation and was reposted on their web site on March 2 2005 less than two weeks after his suspicious suicide.

The article was an account of how two young girls aged 14 and 15 were kidnapped from their dates and were gang raped by a group of Hells Angels when 300 of them were in town for a gathering in Monterey, California.

I haven't read the book yet but I recently watched a Youtube video of an on camera interview of Hunter S. Thompson with a Hells Angel confronting him about his book, denying many things yet admitting many other things. www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFL_rOcmYFo

The treasurer of the Hells Angels said 60% of Hunter's book was cheap trash. He said if a Hells Angels is beating his wife and his dog bites him, that is between the three of them. Then he changes his story and says if he was beating his wife that bad someone would have stopped him.

Hunter then correctly points out that he just admitted the guy was beating his wife. Then the Treasurer states Hunter walked right up to the Hells Angel and said "Only a punk beats his wife and dog." The Hells Angels said Hunter said that. Then he sates the Hells Angel who was beating his wife said "Hunter, do you want some of this?" and Hunter said no. Makes sense to me.

Then the treasurer states Hunter got it anyways and when the Hells Angel who was beating his wife hit Hunter, several other Hells Angels hit him as well. Here we have a group of men watching a guy beat his wife and instead of doing anything to stop it, they gang up on the real man who confronts the abuse. That was cheap and that account is straight from the Hells Angels treasurer's mouth.

Then Sonny Barger admits "We let them beat him up for a bit and we told him to get out of here." Then Sonny Barger claims Hunter then went to the police and said they beat him up which was malarkey but he just admitted it was true.

Hunter was a young and zealous reporter. Did he exaggerate the beating? Perhaps but Sonny Barger admits he was beaten by several Hells Angels and he Hells Angles treasurer stated on camera the reason he was beaten. For confronting another Hells Angel who was beating his wife.

Interesting to note that feminist Susan Brownmiller criticized Hunters flippant treatment of gang rape which his book claims was a common occurrence with the Hells Angels in her book Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape. (p 246-247)

Nevertheless Hunter's conclusion was: "The horror! The horror! ... Exterminate all the brutes."

Fall Election in Canada

I recently received a political flyer in the mail. This time from the Federal NDP. It once again claimed Stephen Harper was "wrong on crime" just like the Liberal flyer right before the last election was called early.

It said "Tough on Crime or Tough on Cops?" It lists three broken promises from the Harper government:

1) Claims Conservatives pledged more money for police but in reality fewer police are on the street.

2) Claims Harper promised a raise for police officers but scrapped the idea leaving families to cope with the recession with even less and

3) Claims an Ontario Supreme court ruled the RCMP be allowed to Unionize but Harper rejected that move and is appealing that decision.

These three "broken promises" are significant and deserve further comment.

1) More funding for more police. This is a good thing but is not the root of the problem. The root of the problem is the revolving door judicial system that sees prolific offenders do less time the more crimes they commit. Let us also remember that the NDP, Liberals and Bloc threatened to bring the Harper government down early after insisting more money be spent on stimulus. So in one breath they forced them to spend the money elsewhere and the next breath complained they ran out of money for police.

2) "Forcing families to cope with less during a recession." Give me a break. The people dealing with the recession are the people who have lost their jobs or have been cut back to part time hours. People who kept their job are facing the lowest inflation rates ever.

3) Unionizing the RCMP. Although that is interesting how will that really help the general public? Less public accountability? More wages for police and less funds available for more officers? Recently there was an episode of the TV series House. House complained in his typical sarcastic cutting wit that he didn't want to do a nurses job just because they cut back the number of nurses and laid many off. The response was he had to do the work because his huge wages were the reason they had to lay off so many nurses.

The bottom line is that I am very skeptical of all these used car salesmen in politics. The Liberals claimed Harper was wrong on crime yet walked out on the vote to fix our revolving door judicial system. Now the NDP is doing the same thing. Complaining about Harper's stance on crime and gangs but not supporting the legislation we need to fix the problem.

Don't get me wrong. I think Harper is just as bad. He knows how many people out there want to legalize or decriminalize pot. Yet he refuses to take an amendment to the motion and impose minimum sentences for violent crime and hard drugs like crack and crystal meth without imposing minimum sentences for possession of pot.

Harper is clearly in it for himself as well and has clearly dropped the ball: www.gangstersout.com/ball.htm

Unfortunately Ignatieff is worse and we are still left with a squabbling bunch of kids who are fighting over who gets to be Prime Minister as they refuse to do the job the people elected them to do: www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOAQkVvkj10

Hells Angels and GHB Date Rape Drug

What was Haney Hells Angel Vincenzo James Sanssalone of Maple Ridge doing with 600 litres of GHB Date Rape Drug? www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=ac17f4b1-eb04-4795-a7d5-54a80771a26d&k=24002

Why was Toronto Hells Angel associate Mark Figueireo sentenced to six years in prison for being caught with 350 litres of date rape drug? The most ever seized in Canada until the Haney Hells Angel seizure.

The Toronto Star reported that Mark Figuereo had no previous criminal record but plead guilty to conspiring with six other men, five alleged to be Hells Angels, to traffic 600 litres of GHB worth $1.2 million. Police found 350 litres of the drug in his Toronto garage.

After the trial Mark Figuereo, 30, wept as he hugged his wife, sister and niece before he was lead away in handcuffs. This is another example of how the happily married family man was just a front. How would he have felt if someone used that drug to rape his wife, sister or niece? Can't you see the irony of living that lie? www.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/513725

Does this not reinforce the police's legal obligation to warn the public when the Hells Angels come to town with one of their special private parties? Let's not forget what happened to Cynthia Garcia after attending one of these Hells Angel private parties. She was stabbed 27 times and dumped in the Desert.

Paul Merle Eischeid who is a Hells Angels fugitive was quoted as saying about her, "She's Nobody. No one cares. No one probably reported her missing. They probably found her... probably (put a) fucking Jane Doe on her." She was a mother of six children. This is the Hells Angels legacy.

Don't the wives of the Hells Angels wonder what they do on their road trips to Amsterdam? "What happens on the road stays on the road." Are you telling me that none of those married men attend the brothel the Hells Angels own in Amsterdam? Isn't that wishful thinking?

Kelowna bans gang colours

Kelowna takes bar watch one step further and bans gang colours in any public business: www.theprovince.com/news/Kelowna+rules+gang+colours+must+stay+outside/1937598/story.html

This is good. It is one step closer to the New York model everyone talks about without knowing what it was.

.

Banning gang colours in bars and nightclubs is a clear step forward. Recording everyone's photo ID is something I'm not sure I'm OK with. First there's the privacy issue, big brother watching our every move. Then there's the other aspect of the privacy issue. What's to prevent a gang from getting the list of other gang members or public individuals to mark and harass?

Let's face it, Ian Grant was a Hells Angel in Winnipeg and a confidential police file was found in his home listing all the names, addresses and next of kin to all the Hells Angels and their rivals in Winnipeg. If the Hells Angels can get a copy of a confidential RCMP file what's stopping them from getting a list of names and addresses of people who visit a particular bar. Especially if the bar is owned by Hells Angels.

.

Likely the intent of collecting ID is to ban known gang members from attending bars period even if they aren't wearing colours. That is a noble quest. Just problematic.

Nevertheless, banning gang colours in bars and nightclubs is a good thing. Taking that one step further and banning them from all public businesses in Kelowna is a good thing. The intent is to stop the intimidation simply wearing gang colours conveys. These gangs are not lawful organizations they are known drug dealers fighting over the drug trade.

One problem is how do you tell someone they have to leave their tattoo outside? Independent Soldiers have the gangs name tattooed on their forearms. Will Kelowna ban them from wearing short sleeve t-shirts in public businesses? If they do I applaud them. If someone gets a gang tattoo and shows that off in a business, they do that to threaten and intimidate: www.zimbio.com/Hells+Angels/articles/43/Christopher+Hudson+proud+Hells+Angels+Dont+t

Banning them from the premises is a good way to start cleaning up the mess by taking out the garbage.

Law and Order - are you in or are you out?

The primary element of the Outlaw Motorcycle Gang is the concept of being an outlaw. At times this concept has been romanticized. Robin Hood was an outlaw but the people liked him. He did good. In the Hip Hop community everyone wants to be a G. Not like weird Hal of course but you get the picture.

When I was a kid being a Nark was the lowest form of life. Here's a guy that would pretend to be your friend, smoke your drugs, then bust you for it. Law enforcement was one thing but pretending to be your friend then busting you had when I was a kid a bad reputation. It was not something to be admired. Nevertheless, moder science has discovered a new low life form - Sonny Barger's pal Otis Garret the Missing Link.

I was confused with the recent documentary about the Federal infiltration in the Mongols. They claimed the Federal Agent couldn't do the drugs or else their testimony in court would have been compromised. I think under cover agents here are different.

Nevertheless, I will concede that since the Motorcycle gangs have transgressed the code so much and deviated so far from the dream, public opinion towards under cover agents is changing. Yet it's not something I would do. Declaring war and going to battle is one thing but pretending to be someone's friend then busting them isn't my thing.

The East Van informant was a different story. Here's a guy who was a bouncer and used to sell drugs for the Hells Angels. He got ripped off and needed some time but the Hells Angels didn't give him any and had him beaten up. He was somewhat pissed about the way he had been treated and ratted them out. That's kind of a natural consequence of mistreating your own people. We see a lot more of that now a days.

In Australia a high ranking Hells Angel and a group of men were accused of gang raping and torturing a woman for several days in Melbourne. They were accused of cutting her toes with a grinder and stopping the bleeding with a blow torch. She claims they told her if she was good they would give her a bullet in the head but if she was bad they would grind her up and feed her to the pigs. One of the men in the group thought this was off the wall and helped her escape.

The man that helped her escape was not a nark nor did he betray his crew. He was the real man that risked his life to do the honourable thing. Something that motley crew knew nothing about. The term 1%er was supposed to mean cream of the crop not the bottom of the barrel.

Now a days we see more informants rise who turn in the Hells Angels or their coaccused. Some are very well paid. Some, like Dennis K did it for a plea bargain. Personally I don't see any honour in that. The honour rises when individuals stand up in defence of real biker values and kick these deviants' ass. Real bikers don't hide and cover up that kind of depravity. Only bullies do.

Take Piggy Palace for example. Robert Picton was asked in court if the Hells Angels were involved in any of the murders on the pig farm and he said no. Why on earth would they ask him that? Why did they deny being at the nightclub on the Farm, Piggy Palace when they were there all the time? Why did they associate with Dave Picton, Roberts younger brother who ran the farm, knowing he was a convicted sexual offender?

I am told statements like "Oh the Hells Angels would never associate with the likes of Robert Picton." but that simply is not true. I'm tired of the lies. Good people with wonderful young children profiting from the sale of hard drugs that promote the dishonest propaganda campaign hiding how far the Hells Angels have really fallen.

The only haunting image that remains in my mind is seeing that crack dealer in Surrey central try and turn some kid who bought crack's girlfriend into a crack ho. She looked like she was 14. There is no honour in that and profiting from that is shameful. Something has to be done. Call Crimestoppers and rat out the real rats.

Lies the OMG told me

There was an interesting documentary on TV the other night about Outlaw Motorcycle Gangs. This one was mostly about the Mongols and how they were infiltrated by an FBI agent around 2000. This must have been before the recent infiltration and huge bust seizing their logo and banning their colours from being worn in public.

I was somewhat surprised to hear of the drug convictions. They echo the recent drug convictions that they claimed they weren't a part of. I do think the Mongols are different than the Hells Angels and I do like DOC and Jesse Ventura a lot better than Sonny Barger. Sonny strikes me as being a pig. A little guy who brags about being a pig. DOC and Jesse Ventura on the other hand are well spoken and come across as being well educated contributors to society.

DOC and Jesse Ventura both speak highly of the military which is where we are told the Hells Angels got their start. The Hells Angels were infiltrated in the States as well: http://www.amw.com/features/feature_story_detail.cfm?id=158

My how times have changed. Now it's all about the money from the drugs. I cannot support that. There is no honour in it any more. The UN talk about honour, Loyalty and Respect but hard drugs was something the old martial arts movies fought against.

The sad thing about that documentary is that it admits the Hells Angels were the ones who started the problem yet they were left to run free while the Monglos logo has been seized. I still say that is very suspicious.

I’m tired of being lied to. I was raised to believe that all the stories about drugs and prostitution were lies and the Hells Angels weren’t into that. Wrong. All the cocaine convictions speak for themselves as does owning brothels in Amsterdam and Vegas. Then there’s Otis Garret. Don’t tell me he was different. He was the leader of a Hells Angels prostitution ring in San Francisco. The woman who testified against him was murdered along with her twin seven year old daughters.

Sonny Barger attended his trial. If Otis had done something the club didn’t approve of, Sonny Barger wouldn’t have attended the trial. His chapter had his photo on their web site until I posted the story. That is where I got his photo from. If the club didn’t support what he had done, they would have taken his photo off their web site at the time not years later when I posted the story. Like I said, there is no honour in what he did. None whatsoever.

Here’s the deal. First you get lied to. Then you get threatened. Then you get angry. That is the pattern of war. The Hells Angels can’t hide from the truth any longer. They can’t bully everyone into silence. They have to live with the truth and the natural consequences that kind of deviant behavior brings.

B.C. Gang Wars Forum

The RCMP have launched a Gang Watch Forum at: http://www.justiceinourtimes.ca

Unfortunately there is no forum on it and despite reaching out to credible people for their input I just get the feeling that there is the same old underlining propaganda rationalizing the Judicial complacency in BC. This is where I break ranks with the establishment and stand in support of Jim Chu from the VPD.

I completely agree that politicians need to take more heat and be more accountable for passing law an order legislation. I do take issue with politicians exploiting our misfortune and using it as a platform to promote themselves and their political party instead of laying party politics aside and doing what is in the country’s best interest.

Nevertheless, I take great offense to the extent of the propaganda passion rationalizing the Judicial screw ups we see on an ongoing basis in BC. My beef starts with the lawyers. Lawyers are by nature arrogant. They refer to each other as “My learned Friend”. If you don’t have a law degree you’re not a learned friend, you are in essence a civilian.

Lawyers see themselves in a different class from the rest of the world and if you don’t have a law degree you don’t understand the courts. Period. It’s compounded by the fact that judges were at one point lawyers. I had one person ask me how is it that a crooked lawyer becomes an honest judge? Is there some kind of epiphany that takes place? Not likely.

The perfect example of this credibility gap was Wally Oppal. He was a former judge and the Attorney General who went to a great deal of effort convincing the public that our judges were fine. He was not reelected and I was not the only one that felt his defeat was related to his stand on the judges.

One page I saw on that RCMP Gang Wars site was the goal to make hearings public so the public can understand why some decisions are made. That is offensive. Here we have the propaganda doctor restating the lawyers misconception that they know everything and the public knows nothing. This is the founding premise of most dictatorships.

It’s not about the charter. The charter of rights is a good thing. It’s about bad judges who are either scared, inept or corrupt. If they are scared I can understand that. Let’s spend more money on protecting our judges and less money on protecting the Bacon brothers.

Nevertheless, defending the charter has nothing to do with throwing out evidence that was acquired after a search warrant was acquired. It has nothing to do with throwing out evidence because the police didn’t knock on the back door after they knocked on the front door to execute a search warrant. The list is long and shameful but we do have a problem with bad judges in BC and if that puts me on a black list for exercising my charter right to say that then so be it.

When the line in the sand is drawn and the masses lobby to rationalize judicial incompetence I will stand on the other side of that line and support people like the mother of Michael Levy who said “I’d like to slap that judge’s face.”