Lesline Lews just sent out a PDF that contains answers from the government of Canada to some of her questions about the WEF's Agile Nations program. In that pdf the government of Canada admits that "Canada was among the seven countries invited to the ‘Panel on Agile Governance for the Postpandemic World’ in November 2020, convened jointly by the World Economic Forum (WEF) and Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)."
"The United Kingdom proposed ‘Agile Nations’ as a forum for collaboration and information-sharing on regulatory innovation. Canada expressed support for the proposal and provided input on early drafts of the Charter to inform the final version that was signed in November 2020."
"The Agile Nations Charter is a recognition by member countries of the need for international collaboration to create a regulatory environment in which innovation can thrive." For Canada, this aligns with existing policy priorities under the government’s regulatory modernization agenda, which includes: • promoting regulatory cooperation to facilitate innovation and reduce barriers to growth, and • helping federal regulators respond to challenges associated with technological change in order to promote innovation and competitiveness in Canada."
Sound suspicious? That's because it is. The Canadian government should not be doing any planning for innovation with the World Economic Forum. Eliminating barriers to the WEF's agenda is absolutely insane. This has nothing to do with creating a strong economy where Canadian citizens prosper financial. It is a political agenda that strives to enslave Canadians with Communism. In addition to the Great Reset, Klaus Schwab wrote a book entitled Stakeholder Capitalism: A Global Economy that Works for Progress, People and Planet.
This agenda has absolutely nothing to do with Free Market Capitalism. Stakeholder Capitalism is a new word for the WEF's brand of Communism just like Globalism is. These are new words hiding and rebranding an old agenda that we saw coming out of East Berlin after the war.
Canada really should have a path to remove a Prime Minister from office. I believe the only way currently would be if the Governor General strips the PM of power which has never and likely will never happen. A rogue PM aka JT can absolutely devastate a country during a term. No real power to remove them is truly not democratic if a majority voted in non confidence.
ReplyDeleteThe Parliamentary system. Same as in England. Pretty much why the Americans didn't do that when they were planning it all out. Senators there are elected, not appointed. Bottom line is, either system can be subverted, as we are now seeing. One is slightly more resistant to tampering but at the end of the day, evil greedy people must be resisted by those who are not for either to succeed. If not, down we go.
ReplyDeleteIf there's anything ever worked in all of history against evil other than active resistance, I'm sure we'd all like to know about that non-existent exception. Because it would be easy, and people love easy, unfortunately, it's a big part of how we got here. Resisting evil requires actual work, more than evil is putting in.
"It is still one of the tragedies of human history that the children of darkness are frequently more determined and zealous than the children of light." Martin Luther King
DeleteAbsolutely.
DeleteThe would include CIA spooks.
Delete