Fake narrative about no exit wound is ridiculous

Back in the day, if you believed a conspiracy theory you were considered crazy. The tables have completely turned. Now, if you believe this ridiculous lie, you are crazy.  

In court, the test of believability asks Is it consistent with the known facts? Does it make sense? Is it believable? In this case the ridiculous claim that a 30-06 round didn't go through his neck because he had vertebrae of steel is simply not consistent with the known facts. It doesn't make sense. It's not believable.

In court, if a witness says something that is not consistent with the known facts and doesn't make sense that means they're lying. If under cross examination the witness is asked how is that possible and they admit it's not possible and say it's a miracle, that's not going to fly because it's bullsh*t. 

These are nefarious people pushing this lie. Charlie Kirk was not shot with a 30-06. That is a fact. The FBI are lying. That is very clear. It is far more likely that what they claim was an entrance wound was the exit wound and he was shot with a much smaller caliber from a completely different angle. 

That means the 30-06 rifle with the crazy writing on the casings was planted there to distract to us from the real shooter.