While we're here let's talk about two more arguments refuting the false charges against the Dirty News blog. The trolls keep trying to defame him because they're on the PoPo's payroll. Blaze said I shouldn't keep talking about him because it will damage my credibility. Like I ever gave a f*ck about that.
The mainstream media has no credibility. A friend of the world is an enemy to God. Not that I care about that but a friend of the world is an enemy to the truth. If the world speaks highly of you, that's a bad sign. They give themselves awards for lying.
It is crystal clear that 6ademixs did not alter the Khalistan referendum logo to defame them. The government of India did. So we clearly have at least one intelligence agency working overtime trying to set him up and fabricate a false story about him. The CBC was involved as well.
The CBC claimed that they messaged 6ademiks on a fake X account impersonating him after he made a post about Ryan Wedding paying his TP well and claimed he said this and that about Ryan Wedding in the messages. First of all, that wasn't him. I subscribe to his X. That post was never on it.
The CBC claim the fake account they saw it on has since been deleted but they provided a screen shot. His real X account has not been deleted. It's still there for the world to see along with his back up X account. Was that fake account the government of India like the other one or was it the FBI? You tell me. It doesn't matter because it wasn't him and people are going out of their way to set him up. Why? Why would they do that?
To eliminate independent media. We all see how they try to control the media and cancel anyone who posts anything contrary to their narrative. They tried the same thing to me.
So let's look at the two new arguments. Recently I posted a picture of Lil Man after he was shot dead before they burned the house down. At first I thought it was AI but then a not really independent YouTuber quoted Post Media News who claim the CFSEU told them it was real. Are they going to arrest me for posting it? The picture I posted has the photo credit embedded in the picture. That's where whoever sent it to me got it from.
Who sent it to them? Who knows? It could have been anyone. It was passed around on social media. What if it was a FBI agent pretending to be an associate of Ryan Wedding?
What if it was a picture of a police informant that was killed? Would the FBI arrest me for posting a picture of a murdered police informant? Is it unlawful to do so? No it is not.
So all these false claims about 6ademiks aren't unlawful, they just build a defamation campaign against him in the eyes of the public. The FBI claim the Dirty News Blogger was paid by Ryan Wedding to post a picture of a police informant they killed.
First of all, he never did that. It was never posted on his website which they seized under false pretense and it was never posted on his X account. Only on fake social media accounts impersonating him.
So he didn't do it but even if he had, that's not against the law. If I, 6ademiks or anyone else post a picture of a dead police informant that is not against the law.
It's not just cause to extradite him and send him to a US Guantanamo bay. There is no evidence of unlawful activity on the table worthy of his extradition. The only other claim is that Ryan Wedding paid him not to write about him.
First of all, that's not true. He did write about Ryan Wedding. I saw it. Only unlike me, 6ademiks didn't claim the charges against Ryan Wedding were fake, he said they were real. He simply quoted mainstream media outlets that said Ryan Wedding was a large scale drug dealer.
So first all all, the FBI lied when they said Ryan Wedding paid the Dirty News not to write about him. That accusation is false because he had written about him. I saw it. However, even if their false claim was true, which it is not, that isn't unlawful.
Say for example the Hells Angels paid me to stop writing about them and I did. That's not unlawful. That's not a crime. So not only is the FBI allegation against the Dirty News blogger false, they aren't accusing him of committing a crime. That means according to the FBI's own indictment, there is no evidence of 6ademiks having committed any crime. They have not met the requirements of extradition. That means the extradition has no lawful reason to proceed. Free 6ademiks.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated so there will be a delay before they appear on the blog.