Robert Morrow and the JFK Files

Since phase one of the Epstein file publicity stunt has come and gone I assume we can expect a similar result from the release of the JFK files. As with Air India, the CIA have destroyed everything they don't want us to see. They learned their lesson from the declassification of Operation Northwoods. Never again will they release those kinds of documents to the public.

When we first heard the promise of Trump declassifying the JFK files I chuckled and said yeah right. We all know the CIA did it. RFK even admitted it on Tucker Carlson. So I ordered two old books by Robert Morrow. One called Betrayal published in 1976. The other called First Hand Knowledge published in 1992. Often you can find truth in old books that have been buried. Like Compromised by Terry Reed or the Politics of Heroin by Alfred W. McCoy.

Robert D. Morrow claims to have been a contractor for the CIA involved in a secret assassination squad tied to the Mafia and joined the CIA in 1961. When you Google his name all the search results have been carefully expunged. 

All the redacted results are from government or CIA sources. One of the declassified documents that comes up on a Google search is a letter from former CIA director Robert William Gambino. The letter states that Angus M. Thuermer, who was an Assistant to the DCI, Director of Central Intelligence, claimed that a reporter had contacted him about Robert Morrow's book Betrayal that was to be published May 1976 saying it contains statements critical of the Agency. 

The reporter wanted to verify that Robert Morrow had at one time been involved with the CIA. Robert Gambino confirmed that the CIA did have a file on Robert Dietz Morrow and that he had worked with the Agency and was granted a secret contractor clearance. They asked him to make a prototype of a radio receiver that didn't work. That's what the CIA claimed. Now they'd just pull a Rainbow Ricky and say he's not with us. 

The letter also states Mario Garcia Kohly was a Cuban exile leader accused of flooding Cuba with counterfeit money. Gambino claimed that Robert Morrow was accused of making the plates for the counterfeit money for Kohly. 

Gambino concluded that there is no evidence in that file verifying Kohly's claim that he got the counterfeit money from the CIA. ROFL. I guess not.

So what does this letter confirm? Gambino's letter confirms that Robert Morrow did have secret contract clearance and was tied to an exiled Cuban leader connected to Operation 40 which was an assassination squad connected to Alan Dulles, Barry Seal, Felix Rodriguez and the Mafia who also killed JFK.

In court it's always nice to use the other party's evidence to build your case. They can't deny the facts they submitted. Robert Morrow claims this assassination squad was tied to the Mafia. Take a look at the CIA Director's name. Robert Gambino. ROFL. Gambino is one of the Five Crime families in New York.

I haven't read Morrow's books yet but he is credible and we all know the CIA did it. Just say'n. The other declassified document that comes up when you Google Robert Morrows is an old news report about Morrow's book. 

The report states that Morrow's book claims he bought and customized four MM Mannlicher rifles the CIA used to assassinate JFK. He assumed they were going to be used on a head of state in Central America. Morrow claimed two weeks before the assassination he heard a rumor that the CIA was going to kill Kennedy but he disregarded the rumor. Until he saw one of the rifles he had supplied them on the news. 

Morrow states he was a contract employee not an agent. Morrow claimed that Lee Harvey Oswald was a patsy, a claim Oswald himself made before he was killed and that Oswald was a low level CIA Agent who had been sent to Russia. 

Betrayal:

OK I've glanced throguh the first book Betrayal. Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Author's note before the forward states the book is based on his experiences. All the names of the characters are real except for those agents who were still alive in 1976. To protect their cover he used fictitious names for them. 

"To help the reader grasp the complex plot and the motives behind it, some dialogue has been improvised." As sincere as that statement may well be, it kind of crosses over into the realm of crime fiction. Yet his account does have immense value.

The primary fact is that he provided the snipers rifles to be used in the JFK assassination as well as a radio device that allowed operatives to communicate off police scanners.  

I have found two minor discrepancies. In once account he claims he started working for the CIA in 1959 while another account he said it was 1961. I suppose that could be explained by the definition of associating with and working for. 

The other discrepancy was the claim that he provided four rifles in one account and three rifles in another. That could be explained by the fact that he provided 4 rifles but only three were used by the three separate assassination squads. 

The conclusion of the book Betrayal recreates the scenario with three teams prepared to complete the assassination if the other teams missed or were unable to execute the shot.

That sounds plausible and organized. The cover of the second book published in 1992 states "A senor CIA agent" yet he claimed he was a contractor not an agent. That statement on the cover sounds more like a ghost writer or a third party. The introduction to the second book was written by John H. Davis who wrote several books about the Kennedys and the Mafia.   

Two statements in the second book I find disturbing. In the Author's Note of the second book he states that "I agree, the act of murder can never be justified... unless its' done for the good of the country. This was one of those instances." No it was not.

The other statement found in the Preface is "To comprehend why the CIA found it necessary to commit the seemingly treasonous act of murdering the country's Commander in Chief, one must understand the political climate of that age." Not.

The purpose of the second book appears to be a rationalization or a justification for the assassination. Perhaps not. Perhaps it just provides a motive why the CIA did it. Yet the real motive is clear. Kennedy vetoed Operation Northwoods while Lyndon B. Johnson ordered an Operation Northwoods on the USS Liberty. There is no justification for that.

The CIA did not kill JFK for not sending air support for the Bay of Pigs invasion. The CIA are the ones that sabotaged that invasion. The CIA killed JFK for vetoing Operation Northwoods.