More Ballistic concerns in the Charlie Kirk Assasination

As someone mentioned in a previous post there are a lot of ballistic concerns with the official narrative in the Charlie Kirk assassination. The feds are straight up lying and that is very concerning. First of all, it was not a 30-06. 

Valhalla VFT showed a clip of a ballistic gel manikin being shot with a 30-06 from 150 yards. It did significantly more damage that what we saw. A lot of hunters are saying this. I own and have shot a 30-06 but that was just at the range on paper targets. If you go hunting or use a ballistic manikin you can see the scope of impact. It is noticeably more than what we saw.

The other obvious concern is what the feds claim was the entry wound. Valhalla VFT did a lengthy Livestream with another ballistic expert from the military showing non gory still frames of the entry wound. It looked like an exist wound not an entry wound because of the way the shirt moved right after impact. 

Obviously if what they are calling an entry wound was actually an exist wound, that would complexly change the trajectory and the origin of the shooter. Either way a 30-06 was not used. 

That creates a big problem for the FBI's there are no Epstein files narrative. If a 30-06 was not used then were on earth did this 30-06 found in the bush come from? The one with all the DNA and the crazy writing on the casings. 

If they hadn't announced the DNA and crazy writing on the casings they could have said oh we made a mistake, that wasn't the murder weapon. Yet we know it wasn't the murder weapon. That means their DNA claims and all the crazy wording on the casings was orchestrated. So now they're force to deflect with denial. Yet they are clearly caught in their own web of lies. 

As Valhalla VFT said, if a 30-06 was used there would have been a large amount of blood splatter. Candace Owens tracked down the Turning Point employee that took down the camera that was filming right behind Charlie Kirk during his speech and assassination. She watched it and said she saw no blood from behind Charlie Kirk. That confirms it was not a 30-06 and also implies the entry wound was an exit wound. 

That also confirms Tyler Robinson was not the shooter.