This video asks the question was the Charlie Kirk assassination a profession hit? Near the end of the video he mentions the old man they first arrested claiming he was the shooter and the problematic nature of that announcement.
If the FBI announce they have the shooter then law enforcement isn't going to set up a perimeter and would there by let the real shooter get away. That in itself is suspicious. This next video asks is the FBI lying about the Charlie Kirk shooting?
When the cops were scouring the area, looking for the shooter..
— John Cullen 🐓 (@I_Am_JohnCullen) September 15, 2025
...they weren't carrying a long gun evidence box, with them.
They weren't walking around with it, so, someone had to go back, get the box, and walk back, with the box, to the scene, and box the weapon.
But, it's… pic.twitter.com/hUklfrMB1i
Glitch in the matrix.
ReplyDeleteUnit 8200 does this all the time.
That footage needs to be forensically audited so that we know it is completely legitimate from beginning to end.
No breaks, no splicing.
Because once it is verified it certainly provides for an alternate scenario.
I know first hand many supposed cc security software packages are routed via Israel and not kept in house.
Unit 8200 could doctor this footage in almost real time.
Some would argue that seems counter intuitive to their position.
I would counter that the more of a mockery that they can make of the evidence the easier it is for the public to be bamboozled with shit.
Once that occurs it creates the wild goose chase effect that hides the truth for eternity.
Looking more like a 5.56 round from a shorter range and different angle.
ReplyDeleteThe wild goose chase has begun.
Who said it was a 5.56 from a different angle?
DeleteAny other source? I'm not posting videos of the actual shooting.
DeleteYeah the internet is full of ballistics experts this week pulling everything but the kitchen sink from their ass.
DeletePrevious commentary..
DeleteIf you think that blood burst was an entry wound than you have no business making a comment about any ballistics.
There's a lot of people claiming to be experts out there trying to get views and likes insulting everyone else pretending to be the ultimate authority on everything. I don't know the difference in blood splatter between a 30-06 and a 5.56.
DeleteI saw one claim that what everyone says was the entry point was actually the exit point which is possible but a bit difficult to believe. That would have meant he was shot from behind and the exiting bullet would have gone into the crowd but the trajectory would make more sense. It would have gone from high to low from the back as opposed to low to high from the front. The narrative implies he was shot from below the waist upwards in the front which doesn't fit a distant sniper shot.
I haven't closely analysed the video of the shooting because I don't watch snuff films. I think it's unhealthy to watch it over and over. Also because I don't know what's been altered and what hasn't. The timing of his murder is enough evidence for me to realize something very shading is going on.
OK I've seen Valhalla VFT's video on the ballistics and it looks like you're right. I really doesn't look like a 30-06 was used. If that entrance wound was actually an exit wound then WTF? He was shot from behind? I remember hearing similar claims about the JFK shooting. Some claim he was shot from the exact opposite direction the FBI said he was.
DeleteLE is definitely pulling a disinformation campaign on us. Have you seen the chat conversation they alleged released between the suspect and his alleged trans BF? I still cant find the official source for the chat conversation.
ReplyDeleteSome people claim the writing style is not how kids that age text each other. I've seen some copies on X:
Deletehttps://x.com/Sadie_NC/status/1968052308841021946
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WEHTk0Xewg