The Assassination of Charlie Kirk

This is another example of extremism. Assassinating someone for their political opinion. That's about as extreme as it gets. Meanwhile AOC is exploiting the tragedy to call for more gun control. STFU will you? That would not honour his memory. 

Such a dramatic tragedy forces us to ask has there ever been a political assassination where the CIA wasn't involved? Not that I know of. We all know the CIA killed JFK. RFK knows it. 

Never mind the JFK files and the Epstein list. We know the CIA was behind both. Ghislaine Maxwell's father was Mossad. The CIA has a long history of foreign assassinations. Wikipedia has a list but Wikipedia is edited by Mossad. 

The point is we all know the CIA has been involved with many extrajudicial foreign assassinations. All these drone strikes in Afghanistan is another example. Oh we killed him because he's a terrorist. Says who? Says the people that blew up the three Towers in New York. This is why due process is so important. The CIA can make up anything about anyone to justify killing them. The CIA lie. Lying is their MO. We cannot in good conscience believe anything they say. 

This is why accepting foreign extrajudicial assassinations is such a slippery slope. If you accept foreign assassinations for any reason that opens you up to accept domestic assassinations for the greater good. 

The CIA were behind the assassination attempt on Donald Trump. Ballistics experts have produced many videos explaining why there were multiple shooters. That kid did not make that shot. Do I really believe the CIA was behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk? Of course I do. If they will kill innocent people in 9/11 they will do anything. What could possibly be their motive? Polarization and gun control. The CIA want to divide us. 

The purpose of this kind of deranged tragedy is to trigger an emotional response and it was very successful at that. The heartfelt tributes are filled with emotions. He was 31 years old and had a wife and children. It's impossible for that not to created an incredibly emotional response.

Don't I think it's heartless to talk about conspiracy theories in the heat of the moment when emotions are so raw? Of course not. I think it's heartless not to because these kind of orchestrated events have an agenda behind them and polarization right now is off the charts. The purpose of this assassination is to further the divide and fill us with hate so we can't see what they are doing behind the scenes. So we won't unite on common ground.

It's like asking if there was ever a terrorist organization the CIA didn't train? The CIA trained the Taliban to fight the Russians. The CIA created ISIS and ISIS K. A CSIS operative was a member of ISIS in Syria. The Mossad created Hamas after the PLO agreed to disarm in the Oslo accord. Operation Fast and Furious armed the Mexican cartel. Declaring the cartel terrorists without declaring the CIA terrorists will solve nothing. 

It's like asking if there ever was a drug dealer the CIA didn't profit from. Freeway Ricky unknowingly worked for the CIA. As Gary Webb pointed out, the CIA was behind the US Crack epidemic in the /80's. The CIA created the Golden Triangle. All the Opium in Afghanistan, that was the CIA until the Taliban brought it to an end. Now fentanyl is everywhere are they expect us to believe the CIA isn't behind it. Not likely. 

Asking these questions is not insensitive. Refusing to do so is.