Bill Majcher Not Guilty!

CSIS Strikes Back:  CTV Defames Bill Majcher for CSIS

Majcher decision posted on Supreme Court website

Judge acquits former Mountie on allegation of foreign interference

Judge finds former RCMP officer not guilty

Wild Bill and Kim Marsh - Exonerated. Devlin said evidence did not prove beyond reasonable doubt Majcher was going to do anything which violated SOIA. The fake thought crime failed.

She dismissed all 4 steps presented by the crown as preparatory in the FBI's intercepted email. Now we need to ask why didn't the RCMP investigate Kevin Sun when Kim Marsh gave them the evidence and why didn't the FBI investigate Uranium One when Ross Gaffney gave them that evidence.

This case certainly opens Pandora's box. One of Cameron Ortis' friends wrote an article in the National Post asking What if he's innocent? That's an important question because if he is innocent, like Bill Majcher is, that reflects government corruption tied to CSIS and the Five Eyes which triggers a Public Inquiry.

Excerpt from the Devlin Decision

[121]     In particular, the thrust of the evidence relating to Mr. Majcher’s general background and business dealings indicates a focus on economic crime and on “asset recovery” services which, on their face, appear to be aimed at entirely lawful objectives (e.g., identifying the proceeds of crime to assist their pursuit by lawful means). At a minimum, the fact that Mr. Majcher openly described his relationship to the PRC with a former Deputy Commissioner of the RCMP supports a reasonable inference alternative to guilt. As a matter of logic, common sense, and human experience, I find it at least reasonable to infer that Mr. Majcher would not direct the attention of a former high-ranking law enforcement official towards his activities with the PRC, if Mr. Majcher intended and understood those activities to be aimed at unlawful, extortive conduct.

Verdict and Conclusion

[124]     Viewing the entirety of the evidence, and remaining alive to the context in which Mr. Majcher wrote his communications to Mr. Gaffney on June 12, 2017, I have a reasonable doubt about the nature and extent of Mr. Majcher’s actions and his subjective intention in relation to Mr. Sun as of May and June 2017. It follows that I find the Crown has failed to meet its burden in this case.

[125]     Mr. Majcher, please stand.

[126]     On the single count in the indictment, I find you not guilty.

[127]     You may be seated.

[128]     Before we adjourn, I wish to express my sincere appreciation to counsel for all of their efforts and professionalism in these proceedings.

[129]     Thank you, we may adjourn.

Heads are going to roll.