CTV Defames Bill Majcher for CSIS

Talk about desperate. Today the judge releases her decision in Bill Majcher's fractured case that completely fell apart before the Crown abruptly shut it down early without calling their star witness. They know they're going to get their a*s kicked so CSIS launched a diversion through CTV. This is the diversion.

Instead of acting on Kim Marsh's evidence and launch a public inquiry as to why the RCMP failed to investigate Kevin Sun for banking fraud, they denounce not one but two separate Memorandum of Understandings Canada had with China committing to cooperating with the investigation of bona fide criminals. Not dissidents but criminals.  

CTV runs with a deplorable hit piece citing examples of China going after dissidents but everyone knows that had absolutely nothing to do with Bill Majcher's case. Nothing at all.

The CSIS Strikes Back hit piece CTV ran for them admits that Mark Carney just renewed the existing Memorandum of Understanding that Justin Trudeau signed in 2016 which was in place when Kim Marsh gave the RCMP the evidence about Kevin Sun who was accused of defrauding millions from a bank in China. That's proceeds of crime. That's not a dissident or a political activist. That's a straight up criminal.

So the CSIS Strikes Back article admits that there was a memorandum of understanding between the government of China and the Canadian government in place when Kim Marsh gave the RCMP the information about Kevin Sun and the RCMP once again thought they were above the law and refused to fulfill that contractual obligation to investigate it. 

That fact should automatically trigger a public inquiry into the RCMP as to why they refused to investigate criminal activity. 

The fact that the FBI have been implicated in this case because they were the ones that submitted intercepted email between Majcher and a former FBI agent demonstrates collusion and motive on the part of the FBI in this case. 

Was Kevin Sun a US Intelligence asset? That question now needs to be publicly answered truthfully. Not hidden under the guise of National Security. 

The CSIS Strikes Back article went so far as to state "Critics say the federal government should disclose the text of the MOU, given the evidence presented at Majcher’s trial, which shows Chinese police acted outside of Canadian laws, as well as threatened and harassed permanent residents in Canada."

That is a bold faced lie. China was acting withing the parameters of the MOU. No laws were broken in the Majcher case. Except for the illegal op CSIS ran in Hong Kong under the guise of MI6. That illegal op did break the law so once again, where is the accountability for that?

The CSIS Strikes Back article also claimed "

One example of Chinese police violating human rights that was cited in the Majcher trial involved a former Chinese Supreme People’s Court Judge who moved to Canada in 2014."

"Xie Weidong criticized Beijing’s justice system and was accused of corruption. To pressure Xie to return home, the MPS imprisoned his sister and kidnapped his son from an underground garage in China. Beijing also sent agents to Toronto to threaten and harass Xie, according to an RCMP affidavit." According to a search warrant the judge deemed illegal because it was based on a false narrative. 

Xie Weidong had absolutely nothing to do with Bill Majcher or his case. Bill Majcher's case was exclusively about Kevin Sun. 

So CTV and CSIS' credibility has completely crashed and burned. We need to talk about that. As I said, Bill Majcher has a lot of friends in the industry that are very concerned about this case because they know that it was a complete set up and reflects government corruption tied directly to CSIS. 

Do we disbanded CSIS? That would certainly be a step forward but we can't go on listening to unscrupulous news outlets that blindly print every lie CSIS tells them. We need to move past this and we need to move past all the gas lighting from CSIS and the fake news. Supply and demand. When a news outlet destroys their credibility, stop watching it.