Global is reporting that "On Aug. 11, Regina police responded to a shooting after 2 a.m. at a home located on the 1000 block of Edgar Street. At least 21 bullets hit the side of the house in the attack and left an 11-year-old girl seriously injured from a gunshot wound. Six weeks after the incident, RPS arrested 20-year-old Anthony Nahbexie and 18-year-old Devon Nahbexie."
CBC is reporting that "Their daughter was rushed to hospital in Regina and later transferred to Saskatoon for surgery, where doctors inserted a chest tube and treated her for internal injuries." That is really f*cked up.
"Devon Nahbexie is also facing two charges of possession of a firearm contrary to prohibition order." Justin Trudeau's handgun freeze has done nothing to prevent this. Criminals don't obey the law. They don't even obey prohibition orders.
The BBC is reporting that "A United Nations commission of inquiry says Israel has committed genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. A new report says there are reasonable grounds to conclude that four of the five genocidal acts defined under international law have been carried out since the start of the war with Hamas in 2023: killing members of a group, causing them serious bodily and mental harm, deliberately inflicting conditions calculated to destroy the group, and preventing births. It cites statements by Israeli leaders, and the pattern of conduct by Israeli forces, as evidence of genocidal intent."
We didn't need a UN report to tell us what we already know. Netanyahu is an Antichrist but the UN will not save us. That's like Stalin saving Poland from Hitler. The UN will exploit this injustice to implement their New World Order turning Jews, Palestinians and everyone else into slaves. Buyer Beware.
City News is reporting that "The Surrey Police Service (SPS) says it has arrested a man wanted on a Canada-wide warrant for extortion and firearms offences."
"According to police, officers arrested 26-year-old Gurdeep Shergill on Sept. 7 in Surrey. He was wanted for his alleged role in an extortion attempt in Brampton, Ontario earlier this year. The Peel Regional Police Service (PRPS) issued the warrant after its investigation into the alleged incidents."
The Toronto Sun is reporting that Gurdeep in one of three charged stemming from an incident July 10th and 11th in Brampton. "Cops said the suspects were seen fleeing in a black Chrysler 300, which was recovered in Winnipeg on July 13."
Agent 66’s first target in Project Divergent was Andre Steele, who he had met while in custody in 2018. "The man said he later became aware of Ryan and his connection to the Hells Angels after he liked one of Steele’s Facebook posts. He showed the post to his police handlers." Ryan clicked like on a guy's Facebook post who was dealing drugs in prison. Idiot.
1130 News is reporting that traffic delays in Port Coquitlam today were caused by a traffic accident where a car hit a bear.
Here's a video from 2020 where a bear approached a runner on the Coquitlam crunch. As she passes the bear she smiles as if to say dodged that bullet.
That was actually some really good footwork. She's jogging down the path, a bear comes out of the trees onto the path, reaches out and touches her knee with it's paw. She sidesteps and pivots around the bear, backs up then keeps on jogging. The smile on her face shows she didn't panic and remained calm. Flawless. If you panic, the bear panics.
While we're on the subject of political assassinations let's compare the assassination of Yitzhak Rabinwith the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi and the formation of a state religion. Then let's take a look at how that fits in with something Charlie Kirk once said and talk about the freedom of religion.
Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated by a right wing extremist within his own community. The same with Mahatma Gandhi. Mahatma Gandhi was assassinated by a Hindu extremist who felt Gandhi was giving too many concessions to the Muslims and Sikhs.
In reality, Gandhi promoted nonviolence and simply wanted different religions to live in peace. The right wing extremist that murdered him did not. He wanted to adopt a state religion and persecute anyone who did not belong to that state religion.
The same with the person who murdered Yitzhak Rabin. That assassin did not want to share the land with the Palestinians and did not support the Palestinian's religious freedom.
All religion shares a common thread. They all believe in the golden rule. Treat others the way you want to be treated. They all teach people to be good and do good. There's nothing wrong with that. The problem arises with sectarianism.
As soon as we strive to persecute other religions we lose the original intent of religion. It violates the golden rule. If you want religious freedom for yourself, don't take it away from anyone else. There's no such thing as a holy war. Fighting for religious freedom is acceptable. Fighting a war to promote your religion and take away the religious freedom of others is not.
The adoption of a State religion violates the founding premise of religion. It's also the stepping stone to abolishing religion all together. First you abolish all religions but one, then you abolish that one final religion and there you have it. You're left with a Marxist Leninist Atheist state.
Dan Dicks put out a video discussing the probabilities of the motive behind the Charlie Kirk assassination. Was it Mossad or was it a crazy left wing kook. His first impress was it could have been either. He quoted a relevant scripture from the Bible then shared a video of Charlie Kirk which he claims explains who did it. Personally I don't think the clip he chose revealed anything. Charlie Kirk's statements about Netanyahu and the ethnic cleansing in Gaza are far more revealing.
Charlie Kirk is on a panel and asked a question about whether or not America was founded on Christian principles. I agree with Charlie in that it clearly was. However, I believe that the freedom of religion means the freedom of religion. It doesn't mean the freedom of one religion and the persecution of all other religions. The Declaration of Independence mentions God four times but never mentions Jesus once.
The quote on the back of the dollar bill which is found on the United Stats Seal states in God we trust. That can resonate with Christians, Jews, Muslims, Sikhs and Hindus. It can resonate with and include every religion not just one.
The idea that we have to go back to our Christian roots could in some ways alienate everyone who isn't Christian. To claim that America is only meant for Christians is false and a very dangerous road. Instead of leading to religious freedom it leads to religious persecution.
After the Protestant Reformation we saw Christianity splinter into many different brands that all fought with and contradicted each other. If you are a Protest, would you support adopting Catholicism as the State religion? I think not.
If you are a Catholic would you support adopting the Protestant faith as a state religion? Which one because they all fight with and contradict each other. The freedom of religion means the freedom of religion. Departing from that pledge would violate the Constitution and the intent of the Founding Fathers.
Thomas Paine was a Deist, believing in God and natural law but rejecting organized religion. Are we going to ban Thomas Paine from Citizenship? That would violate the Constitution. The First Amendment states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." You can't ban Muslims, Sikhs or Hindus from citizenship. You have to learn how to coexist with them. That is the purpose of religion. To teach us how to live together.
This video asks the question was the Charlie Kirk assassination a profession hit? Near the end of the video he mentions the old man they first arrested claiming he was the shooter and the problematic nature of that announcement.
If the FBI announce they have the shooter then law enforcement isn't going to set up a perimeter and would there by let the real shooter get away. That in itself is suspicious. This next video asks is the FBI lying about the Charlie Kirk shooting?
The most obvious question is how did he get the rifle from the scene and stash it in the woods? One video suggests Tyler's job was to be seen on the roof. He was a patsy. Someone else took the rifle from the scene and someone else made the shot.
When the cops were scouring the area, looking for the shooter..
...they weren't carrying a long gun evidence box, with them.
They weren't walking around with it, so, someone had to go back, get the box, and walk back, with the box, to the scene, and box the weapon.
While we're here, let's compare the assassination of Charlie Kirk with the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin November 4th 1995. Was Yitzhak Rabin shot by a Palestinian? No he was not. He was shot by a right wing extremist who was Jewish.Benjamin Netanyahu benefited from his murder.
After that assassination ofYitzhak Rabin, Mossad created Hamas to push Fatah out of Gaza because the PLO signed a cease fire agreement. Mossad and Netanyahu didn't want anything to do with that agreement. He did not want to share the land with the Palestinians, he wanted to wipe them out so Israel could be from the river to the sea and then some.
Mossad rightly complains that Hamas' manefesto is unacceptable. The only problem is that Mossad are the ones that wrote it. Before the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin the PLO had been fighting with Israel for many years. Neither side recognized the other side's right to exist. No one wanted to share the land. They both wanted it all to themselves.
The Oslo accord changed all that. For the first time both sides recognized the other side's right to exist. The Jews and the Palestinians both have a hereditary right to that land but neither party has an exclusive right to the land. No one wants to share.
The Oslo accord recognized a Palestinian State and created the Palestinian Authority. Why is that important? Israel is a Jewish State. If you're not Jewish you can't become a citizen. Palestinians were residents without a country or a passport.
Netanyahu says there will be no two state solution. That would defeat the purpose of Yitzhak Rabin's murder. I support the Oslo Accord, I don't support Hamas. I agree with Charlie Kirk in that Netanyahu is determined to ethnically cleanse Gaza. That I cannot support.
“I gotta be careful the way I say this” - Charlie Kirk
An image of an Israeli soldier's uniform with a patch of the map of 'Greater Israel' has been circulating online. Far-right Israelis also openly express their territorial desires.
Here the long-term ambitions of the supporters of 'Greater Israel' are explained pic.twitter.com/sNNs4ypVh3
Netanyahu publicly denies they were involved with the assassination of Charlie Kirk just like he publicly denies they had anything to do with Jeffery Epstein despite the fact that Ghislaine Maxwell's father was Mossad.
I want to talk about the dangers of polarization. This is one of the reasons I think the CIA were involved with Charlie Kirk's assassination. We are so deeply polarized right now and the CIA keeps driving the two sides further apart.
We can now see the great divide between the left and the right and it has indeed become extreme. The American flag is referred to as the stars and stripes or the red, white and blue.
The flag represents red states and blue states living together in one union. The freedom of association and the freedom of expression are important elements of a free society.
There is a dark purpose behind polarization. It's not just to keep people divided, it's to push people to the extremes. Yet both extremes lead to the same place. That's why they push it.
In my line in the sand diagram I talked about the lines that people cross where Liberals become Communists and Conservatives become Fascists. There is a big line between Conservatives and Fascists because the two are actually opposites. One believes in a centralized government while the other believes in a decentralized government.
Right now we are deeply divided and the polarization we witness keeps becoming more and more extreme. Events like the Charlie Kirk assassination keep driving people further and further apart. Each side becomes hatefully of the other completely unwilling to see or recognize any common ground.
Trump 2.0 has been completely different than Trump 1.0. Everything Trump promised to do he didn't. Instead of draining the swamp he became the swamp and used the promise of draining the swamp to simply eliminate political rivals.
The first problem came from the centralization of power. I did a podcast about how they accused Trump 1.0 of being Fascist when he wasn't but Trump 2.0 has indeed led us down the road of Fascism through the centralization of Government.
Right now racism is off the charts. I commented on how people like Marc Emery scour the Internet for examples of extremism to justify their own extremism. Marc Emery is complaining about the number of Asians and East Indians in Metro Vancouver. I was like AYFKM? Are you even from here? Asians and East Indians have always been a vibrant part of our community.
Yet Marc Emery isn't the only one openly promoting racism now. Recently there was a press conference about the Rabih Alkhalil arrest in Qatar which is another anomaly all on it's own. After the press conference the comments on social media were amazingly racist and no one bat an eye about it.
After the press conference people were like learn English. They were like these temporary work visas must be very hard. She had to stay up all night working at Tim Horton's before doing a RCMP press conference. It was absurd and when people reported the comments Facebook said, that's fine. They fit within our guidelines. Before Trump 2.0 people would call things that weren't racist racist and now things that are racist they claim aren't racist. What on earth happened? We've gone from one extreme to the other and it keeps getting worse.
I submit that one of the goals of polarization is to push the extremes and great a great divide. Previously I asked how does a Conservative become a Fascist because Conservatives and Fascists are opposites. Hate. People become consumed with hate and forsake all the Conservative values they once had in an end justifies the means quest.
The purpose of the Charlie Kirk assassination was to increase polarization and make people hateful thus blinding them to the big picture. Once they become hateful of the other side they put blinders on. They cover their eyes and their ears refusing to listen to anything the other side has to say.
They scour the Internet for examples of extremism to justify their own extremism. In so doing they become inherently partisan. That means when their side becomes too extreme they refuse to recognize it and rationalize it by using examples of extremism they have found on the other side.
For example, when Donald Trump says or does something too extreme, no one questions it because the other side wants to transition kids in school and put men in women's sports.
It's a dangerous road that leads to Fascism because it stops questioning the centralization of power or the brutalization of the police state. One could argue that the CIA is pushing Fascism to the extreme until it fails so they can say, Fascism didn't work so let's try Communism. Let's not do neither.
Let's shun the extremes and find a healthy balance between them. For example, Candace Owens supported Donald Trump but objects to the genocide in Gaza. That doesn't mean she supports transitioning kids in school.
Likewise Rand Paul says tariffs are taxes. That doesn't mean he supports men in woman's sports. That simply means he supports lower taxes like every Conservative should. As a result, Rand Paul has teamed up with the Democrats in supporting a bill that limits Trump's power to arbitrarily impose tariffs. That doesn't mean he supports gun control or Q plus.
The purpose of polarization is to create a gulf or great divide so that people from both sides won't work together to stop the WEF's agenda. The CIA and the WEF want people fighting with each other so they don't see where they are taking us and so they don't join forces to stop them.