Looking at the Big Picture in Life

We sure seem to be stuck in a rut with all these Lebanon invasion atrocities which is preventing a ceasefire in the unprovoked Iran War. So let's talk about that and let's talk about how the media is still misrepresenting that. 

I've talked about how this is the Alice in Wonderland era. It is the age of deception, extremism and atrocities. Atrocities are rationalized with lies. Recently I saw a headline about an Arab going on a shooting spree in Israel and I was like AYFKM? 

First of all, it was probably a false flag like Bondi Beach but even if it wasn't, Israel is committing mass acts of terrorism on innocent civilians on a daily basis and that's OK but as soon as someone responds it make international headlines. 

That's suspicious. I don't support any acts of terrorism. Not even in response to acts of terrorism. I denounce all forms of terrorism and recognize that many acts of terrorism like 9/11 and October 7th are false flag attacks. A tactic that Hitler used to gain power and con the German people. 

The unprovoked invasion of Lebanon is completely Adolf Hitler. It has resulted in a legitimate rise in antisemitism which is really antifascism because they've changed Zionism into Fascism.  

Zionism was supposed to mean the pure in heart. It was supposed to represent the Oasis of Peace where Jews and Palestinians live together in peace based on principles of religious freedom. That's what Zionism was supposed to mean. Yet with lies and false prophecies they have clearly turned Zionism into Fascism with this expanded border delusion. 

Everyone has an agenda. The fake news is rationalizing these atrocities to justify the same atrocities in Israel when the tide turns. Two wrongs don't make a right. Two wrongs are simply both wrong. The UN's New World Order is not the solution. 

The flat earther keeps saying I have Trump Derangement Syndrome which is one way the few cult members left rationalize supporting atrocities based on lies. I don't have the time of day for this guy because I see flat earthers as a mental illness just like Trump 2.0 so I'm not going to waste my time. I'm just going to record my dissent. 

It all boils down to Margaret Thatcher 1982. When Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982, she cut off weapons sales to Israel. It was a no brainer. So why aren't we doing that now? That's the golden question. There's an agenda at play. More than one.

For me it's not just the WEF and the UN, it's also the Intelligence community. The malicious prosecution of Bill Majcher showed us that the government and the intelligence agencies are corrupt. That's what it showed us. Fixing that may be difficult but the logical consequence is to question everything they tell us because lying is the CIA's method of operation and they use the media to push their lies on the public. 

People get discouraged and say it's no use. We can't fix it. There's no hope and start contemplating MAIDS. That's exactly what they want you to think. I submit that there is hope. There always is. The very fact that they spend so much time and money on censorship and propaganda shows you how important public opinion is. If public opinion didn't matter they wouldn't be lying to us all the time to try and con us. 

Seeing through the lies may sound like a simple solution but it's definitely an important step. As I've said before, to see through the lies you have to take the partisan blinders off because we're being lied to on both sides.  

One of the reasons they promote extremism is to push the great divide. The more polarized and divided people are the more they can get away with. In this era of extremism we need more talk of moderate ideologies that balance the extremes. 

They're always searching for examples of extremism to justify an extreme response to that extremism in so doing they promote polarization and furthering of the great divide.  

It's like the flat earther with the partisan blinders on. If you disagree with anything Trump says you are the enemy. That's how they use a cult to justify atrocities but it goes both ways. If you disagree with far left ideals then you must agree with Trump 2.0. No, I disagree with both extremes because they're both wrong. That's why they're called extremes. 

It's not one extreme or the other, there is something else in between but to find it we have to take the partisan blinders off. We have to agree with any man as long as he stands right and part with them when they go wrong. 

I agree with Mark Carney about Lebanon but I disagree with him about the WEF and the UN. I agree with Pierre Poilievre about property rights but I disagree with him about Lebanon and the new Neo Con Fascism that he has embraced. 

All these blind idiots had to abandoned their founding Conservative principles to become Neo Cons. Stephen Harper often spoke at the WEF. Putting him in Charge of the Alberta pension is a bad idea. Aaron Gunn refuses to separate himself from Trump 2.0's Neo Con extremism. He had the audacity to blame Carney for the last spike in the price of gas when it's clearly because of Trump's unprovoked war with Iran that facilitated Netanyahu invasion of Lebanon based on a lie. 

This is where Aaron Gunn's blind partisanship has forced him to abandoned the very Conservative principles he once claimed to uphold. It's like Alberta separation. Claiming that Alberta's not allowed to separate gives too much power to a centralized government. Yet I don't believe separation is the answer. Not when they are embracing Neo Cons like Stephen Harper. 

Look at the hiking ban in Nova Scotia. A Conservative premier threw away civil liberty in a heartbeat just like all the Neo Cons do after a false flag attack. I do think that Alberta can't separate with out the support of their local First Nations who have legally binding treaty rights in place. 

That not to say I support DRIPA or UNDRIP because I don't. I support what Treaty Rights are not what they are misrepresented to be. I support property rights and I oppose Aboriginal privilege. All people are equal. End of story. 

When we are surrounded with such drastic extremes from both sides, it's OK to disagree with both extremes. In fact, it's our duty. It's common sense. Something people abandon when they put on the partisan blinders that prevent them from using reason. People only see what they want to see. They're called algorithms. As a result, more extreme content gets circulated.