BC seeks to seize three more Hells Angels clubhouses

City News is reporting that "British Columbia’s Director of Civil Forfeiture wants to seize three clubhouses from the Hells Angels, claiming properties in Surrey, Mission and Pitt Meadows were used by the motorcycle club to carry out unlawful activities, including drug trafficking and murder." 

"The director’s lawsuit filed in B.C. Supreme Court on Wednesday says the Surrey clubhouse is owned by defendants Gurbinder Singh Johal and Kulwant Kaur Johal, who have allegedly allowed the property to be used by the club since 2018. The lawsuit says the Mission clubhouse is owned by a numbered company, while the Pitt Meadows property is owned by Haney Farms Ltd., a company directed by alleged chapter members Vincenzo Brienza and Emil Utovic." They already seized Kelowna, East Vancouver and Naniamo.

I don't think this is a good thing. Some could call it displaced aggression but I think it goes deeper than that. There's clearly more than meets the eye hear.

For example it claims the clubhouses have been used to plan drug trafficking and murder. Kind of like how Damion Ryan ordered the murder of Anees Mohamed who had been selling drugs for him in the DTES. 

IHITit keep going after the people the Hells Angels hired without going after who hired them. That goes right back to Joey Verma and Brittney Irving. IHIT don't care who hired him. They don't even care that Blaze helped him. They still have Blaze on their payroll for f*cks sake. That makes this application complete hypocrisy. If you're so concerned about murder, then why are you protecting the ones ordering the murders? It's very shady. 

If you're so concerned about drug trafficking then why were you protecting Damion Ryan all these years while he was running the drugs in the DTES? If you're so concerned about drug trafficking then why don't the CFSEU in BC make drug busts like every other province? Seizing a clubhouse without making drug busts is shady. It reveals an agenda.

As I've said before I'm not a fan of seizing proceeds of crime legislation because it removes the incentive to stop crime. Instead of stopping crime they want to profit from crime. This was really brought home in Freeway Ricky's documentary Crack in the System.

In that documentary a former DEA agent was on and admitted that after the CIA pulled the plug on the Blandon bust, the DEA became corrupt. Instead of seizing drugs they just focused on seizing drug money and pocketing finders fees. So that's a pretty clear example of why proceeds of crime legislation is a bad thing. 

I thought the Softside clubhouse in Surrey was a rental. Pitt Meadows, the one by Pitt Lake? I think that's a bit extreme. It's a nice location. Pitt Lake is awesome. Enjoying the outdoors is good for everyone. 

I don't even know where the Mission clubhouse is. Years ago one member was busted with a few others in a huge cocaine shipment in Europe but that was a long time ago and that was one member. As George Christie said "The Hells Angels aren't a criminal organization because the members who are involved in criminal activity and stingy and don't share the proceeds of crime with the other members." That is believable. 

Instead of seizing clubhouses they need to make drug busts and go after the people who ordered the hits not just the shooters then give the people who ordered the hits police protection to sell drugs. That is what we now face.