Tyler Robson and the missing pieces

We have a big problem.@FBIDirectorKash

The round that shot Charlie Kirk was not recovered.

And, in a related story..

A .30-06 rifle was found wrapped in a towel in a nearby wooded area.

There is no ballistic connection.

🙄

Therefore, I'm afraid we have a really big… pic.twitter.com/lesu3nz417

— John Cullen 🐓 (@I_Am_JohnCullen) September 13, 2025

Global News is reporting that "U.S. authorities confirmed Friday morning the arrest of 22-year-old Utah man Tyler Robinson, the suspect in the killing of Charlie Kirk. Kirk, 31, died after he was shot in the neck while speaking at an event at Utah Valley University on Wednesday." 

So they have a suspect. A 22 year old kid. Did he make that shot? I don't know. Do I still think the CIA are behind this? Yes I do. I don't believe that kid they claim shot Trump made that shot from that distance. John Cullen is a ballistic expert. He explained why there were multiple shooters in the Donald Trump assassination attempt. He's illustrated many conflicts with several recent mass shootings including the one in Las Vegas.

After the recent shooting at a school mass Candace Owens said the government is behind this. Each shooting is more traumatizing than the next. It's designed to scare us into compliance. The Charley Kirk shooting is designed to promote further polarization and create a great divide. 

Before we even look at ballistics, I'm going to address the first concern that comes to mind. How did he make that shot? Was he a trained hunter? Kids who are taught to hunt and fish don't mug little old ladies. Hunting and fishing brings with it a sense of groundedness. Kids who hunt are taught the proper use of firearms along with gun safety. 

There is a specific narrative being crammed down our throat and I don't buy it. Just like with the recent shooting at the school mass the shooter wrote strange messages on bullets or magazines. As far as I'm concerned that's over the top. That's where they crossed the line and made the story less believable. 

In the Global News article they reported that the family noticed he was becoming political. They had a conversation at the dinner table about Charlie Kirk coming to town and he said he did not like him and thought he was a fascist. 

That on it's own is a valid opinion. Like my father used to say feelings are neither right or wrong they just are. Everyone has a right to their feelings. How we express our feelings can be appropriate or inappropriate but everyone has a right other feelings. Shooting someone in the head for their political opinion would obviously be an inappropriate way to express those feelings. Yet the narrative concerns me.

Now all of a sudden if you disagree with Charlie Kirk and think he is a Fascist you are a mass shooter. Obviously not but the narrative is grooming us to never doubt extremism on the right and that is not healthy. This leads to my next post on the dangers of polarization. People become so divided and so hateful of the either side that they are no longer allowed to doubt, question or disagree with any opinion on their side no matter how far extreme it is. That is not healthy.  

Something doesn’t add up. Michael Savage hits the nail on the head here. pic.twitter.com/DMRwbbvM1k

— John Galt (@dadiani_george) September 12, 2025