This 2026 census is literally insane. Census' are supposed to ask how many people in the home and their ages. That's it. I stopped filling the 2026 census out because it's ridiculous.
Just yet another example of government over reach. It's the law. Yeah go f*ck yourself. When a law violates the Charter of Rights that law is illegal. Census' are allowed to ask how many people live in the home and their ages. That is all.
I have no problem with censuses. I've always been big on genealogy but this census is not a census. It is way too invasive. All these freaks that say oh just do it, go f*ck yourself.
Someone said I should reach out to Jason Logan about forest fires. Jason was a former fire fighter and former Hells Angel from California and runs a podcast. I had a look at some of his stuff and will link to it here. He reminds me of George Christie.
I like George. He's authentic. Likewise, Jason Logan appears to be authentic. I don't want to hate but that Demon Row guy just tries too hard. He's trying to be something or portray himself as something and he glorifies the life.
I see that Jason Logan has a long list of podcasts about biker culture. Good for him. A lot of people are interested in that and for that reason I will point them in his direction but that ain't me.
Contrary to public opinion, I don't care about the Hells Angels or biker culture. I care about drugs in my community but I don't obsessed over what these guys are doing. I'm not interested in that life. I thought Sons of Anarchy was a stupid show.
A stupid show about a stupid life. Yes I ride a motorcycle but I'm not a biker. I don't sell drugs and I don't pimp crack hoes. For me riding a motorcycle is Zen. I like the wind therapy and I like the feel. It's also cheap on gas.
I'm not looking for any comradery. Not because it's all fake but because I ride solo. I do my own thing. I don't like to confirm to somebody else's rules. It's like the term Anarchists rule book. It's an oxymoron, a contradiction of terms.
Jason recently did two episodes with George Christie. So again if you're interested in biker culture, which I am not, I would point you in his direction as opposed to all the wannabe posers out there. I'm doing my own thing. Something a little different.
Recently Jason was on another podcast run by Ian Brick on why he left the life. I think it helps show how different the club is in the US as compared to Canada. Here it's a lot more about making money in the drug trade. There it's more about biker culture. Here the preppy a*s b*tches like Larry Amero and Damion Ryan don't even ride motorcycles. They just ride SUVs and sell drugs. They're not living the dream they're pimping the dream. Selling it out for the almighty dollar.
David Eby's government is spending tax dollars on wildfire commercials claiming that "Climate change is creating warmer, drier conditions that can make wildfires more intense and extend the fire season."
They claim "The Government of B.C. is working with experts, communities, and Indigenous partners to reduce wildfire risks and protect the places we love." Yet that is a bold faced lie. They are doing the opposite and everyone can see that which forces us to examine their political motive for doing so.
Canadair has started building these proven workhorses again and David Eby's twisted commercials aren't saying a word about them. Instead of becoming more effective at fighting fires due to climate change, they want us to throw our hands in the air and follow evacuation orders instead of fighting fires and protecting property. That says it all. Instead of spending tax dollars on devious commercials and on spraying forests with pesticide to remove undergrowth which actually promotes forest fires, let's spend some money on these Superscooper water bombers. That's how we save the planet. Not with lies and deception.
The Chilliwack Progress is reporting that "The wildfire ignited at Cultus Lake in the early hours, which is listed as out of control, has 14 firefighters and a helicopter responding from the Coastal Fire Centre, according to the BC Wildfire Service (BCWS)."
"Residents at the lakeside community reported seeing a water-bomber aircraft pass over the lake with low hanging smoke drifting near the water level, before the wildfire response started." Can I get a WTF brother?
We have all noticed a change in BC's forest fire mismanagement. Instead of using water bombers like we have for generations, we now use a helicopter with a bucket and a guy with a shovel. That isn't science. That isn't technological advancement. That is bat sh*t crazy and criminal culpability.
August 2023 there was a large fire in Kelowna that jumped the lake and got dangerously close to the town. It wasn't until the fire jumped the lake that they finally brought in the water bombers and quickly brought it under control. The question is why did they wait so long to bring in the water bombers?
We keep getting climate change crammed down our throat which forces us to ask, instead of throwing our hand in the air like Chicken Little, why don't we simple adapt and prepare for it?
We need to be more proactive in dealing with forest fires not less. We notice dryer summers. Whether that be from climate change or America Harp radar systems like the one Iran just blew up, we do notice drier summers.
BC has always had a forest fire problem in the summer. Pilots wanting to get their commercial pilots license needed hours so they would fly small water bomber float planes during the BC fires. A fire beside a lake makes this very effective because they can fill up on the lake. Even a fire on the coast, as we saw in LA, Canadian water bombers filled up in the ocean. It's not ideal but it works. Salt water isn't toxic.
All this fake science is getting out of hand. We saw them cut the water off in Maui and LA. Both were for stupid reasons. It's hard not to think there's some kind of agenda or conspiracy at play when you see such obvious negligence.
Then there's the back burns that back fire. This is too important to screw up the way we are. All that money spent on spraying the forests to prevent under growth which increases the risk of forest fires needs to be spent on water bombers. It's that simple. Rage, denial and lies will not change that.
These fires have been massive and like many of the other massive forest fires of late, a lot of arson is suspected. For a while people were burning down rain forests in Brazil to create agricultural land. Yet the Patagonia fires seem to have a far more sinister motive. Before we dive into the motive take a look at this Patagonia forest fire image:
What's wrong with this picture? Once again we see a criminally culpable forest fire mismanagement based on a UN gender equality water rationing lie. Fighting a massive forest fire with a garden hose and a shovel is mentally insane. There's no way around that fact and we see this same lunacy being repeated around the globe.
In the Maui fire they cut off the water because water was sacred. Something we should worship. In the LA fires they cut off the water over a fake scheme to save ocean smelts. In BC they stopped using water bombers to fight forest fires and now use helicopters with a tiny bucket. This pattern of forest fire mismanagement is clear.
"On April 19, 2026, Argentine President Javier Milei met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, signing the 'Isaac Accords' to strengthen security, AI, and diplomatic ties. Milei reaffirmed plans to move Argentina's embassy to Jerusalem and announced direct flights with El Al, highlighting a strong, alliance-based, pro-Israel stance, including support in the 2026 Iran war context."
January of this year during the Patagonia wildfires, the Jerusalem Post reported that "Argentine retired military general César Milani, alongside several key figures from the opposition, shared an antisemitic conspiracy theory on Sunday claiming two Israelis used an IDF grenade to cause a wildfire in the Patagonia region of southern Argentina."
The antisemitic conspiracy theory goes much further than that and the newIsaac Accords implies that Netanyahu is trying to colonize Argentina. We know that real estate developers wanted those homes in Maui before that devastating fire.
January of 2026 Al Akhbar reported that "Under President Javier Milei, Argentina’s environmental and sovereignty protections have been weakened. Restrictions on foreign land ownership are being dismantled, and the Fire Management Law, designed to prevent land-use after fires, has been undermined."
"And while no statute explicitly authorizes foreigners to acquire burned land, the gradual erosion of legal safeguards makes such acquisitions easier. Moreover, the country’s capacity to prevent and contain fires has been reduced. Official projections show that the funding for Argentina’s National Fire Management Service will fall by roughly 70% by 2026, compared with recent years."
"Long before Palestine became the focus of the Zionism project, Theodor Herzl suggested Argentina as a potential destination for Jewish settlement."
PBS is reporting that"Theodor Herzl, a Hungarian-born Jew, is considered the father of political Zionism. His 1896 pamphlet, 'The Jewish State,' set forth the framework for establishing a Jewish nation."
"In this essay, Herzl indicated that there were two territories being considered for the location of the Jewish state -- Palestine and Argentina. 'Shall we choose Palestine or Argentine?' asked Herzl. 'We shall take what is given us.'"
"Newly declassified files from the National Archives in Kew reveal that Israel supplied significant weaponry including strike aircraft to the Argentine Junta in the run-up to, and during, the 1982 conflict. The files show that Israel provided, via Peru, air-to-air missiles, missile radar alert systems, and large capacity fuel tanks for the Argentine Skyhawk aircraft, giving them extra defensive capability and air time over the Falkland Islands, during the conflict." Navitas Petroleum - another Oil War.
I read it out loud and said, great. This is a huge in your face fraud of the Alice in Wonderland Era that Donald Trump's Fascism and Netanyahu's atrocities can't distract us from. Trump was supposed to deal with this but he ran off in the wrong direction and ended up expediting it.
Net Zero 2030 is a UN catch phrase promoting their New World Order. The slogan Net Zero has absolutely nothing to do with protecting the environment. It is solely based on fake environmentalism to justify a very dark political agenda.
We all know that pollution is bad. We get it but natural gas is clean burning. When West Vancouver converted from heating homes with coal to heating homes with natural gas, the air quality instantly improved. Industrial coal is the largest source of CO2 emissions on the planet. Event the obsession with CO2 is a misleading distraction.
Net Zero implies zero CO2 emissions which would mean all plant life on earth dies because they need CO2 to survive. That would also mean all human and animal life dies because they need the oxygen the plants and trees produce. That is the ecosystem we live in. Plants and trees take in CO2 and give off oxygen. Humans and animals take in oxygen and give off CO2.
So Net Zero literally means no more animal or human life which in turn would mean no more plants or trees. That's not very green. Farming is the greenest thing you can do for the planet. Banning fertilizer has nothing to do with protecting the environment. It's an attack on farming to create global food shortages to stop population growth.
Banning water has nothing to do with protecting the environment. Water is a renewable resource. Once it's used it evaporates and returns as rain. Banning the use of large quantities of water in fighting forest fires is not protecting the environment it's killing it. Yet the primary concern revolves around natural gas and industrial coal.
Germany phasing out their industrial coal plants with natural gas would be a colossal improvement in air quality and global CO2 emissions. Bombing the NordStream pipeline had nothing to do with protecting the environment. It was a direct attack on the environment. So this Net Zero fraud needs to be confronted.
Another definition Net Zero is when human-caused carbon dioxide emissions are balanced by removing an equivalent amount from the atmosphere. Removed how?
"Carbon dioxide ( CO2) is removed from the atmosphere through natural processes like photosynthesis (trees, plants, algae) and ocean absorption." No kidding.
Reducing deforestation is another important factor. The use of glyphosate and banning the use of large quantities of water in fighting forest fires, increase deforestation.
So do back burns and pre ignitions. By intentionally burning down the forests they are reducing the amount of CO2 consumed through photosynthesis which in turn will require more emission cuts to justify their Agenda. Here's a thought. Stop burning down the forests.
Carbon dioxide ( CO2) is also removed from the atmosphere through direct air capture. Another crazy idea to make it look like they're doing something when in reality they're not. Their fake environmentalism is just making it worse.
Forest fires in Canada produce far more CO2 than all the cars do. So let's go back to the more effective ways of fighting forest fires with water bombers instead of buckets and shovels and stop using glyphosate. We also need to stop using back burns and pre ignitions. We have seen how that has done far more damage than good. Here's the theory.
A forest fire starts and the wind blows it in one direction. The light a back burn or a pre ignition ahead of the fire so the fire will run out of fuel by the time it gets to the back burn. The problem with the theory is the obvious - wind.
If the wind is blowing a fire in a certain direction and you light a back burning ahead of that fire so it runs out of fuel, how on earth is the wind that's bowing the fire towards you going to blow the back burn toward the fire? It's not and we have seen countless examples of how back burns have made a bad fire much worse. So stop it. The problem is pollution not CO2.
Save the planet by planting trees not by burning it to the ground.
Global is reporting that "It’s been six years since a man disguised as an RCMP officer began a shooting rampage in ruralNova Scotia, killing 22 people including a teenager and a pregnant woman."
"The worst mass shooting in modern Canadian history began after denture-maker Gabriel Wortman assaulted his common-law partner in Portapique, N.S., before fatally shooting neighbours, strangers and an RCMP officer."
Used to launch a Liberal gun ban knowing full well that none of the firearms Gabe Wortman had were legally obtained.
When the RCMP showed a large deposit into Gabe Wortman's bank account, they tried to claim he was tied to organized crime. Then Macleans said wait a minute. That's the same way police agents get paid. The RCMP were the ones that deposited that money into his bank account.
The Nova Scotia RCMP deflected and said he didn't work for us. Then Paul Palango found the Paper trail. Gabe Wortman didn't work for the Nova Scotia RCMP he worked for the New Brunswick RCMP. The Nova Scotia RCMP lied because the RCMP is a federal police force not a Provincial police force.
That means the New Brunswick RCMP were the ones that supplied Gabe Wortman with the firearms used in Canada's largest mass shooting. Mentioning the mass shooting without mentioning that fat is criminally culpable.
"Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston announced that flags would be lowered to half-mast at all provincial government buildings this weekend."
Tim Houston, the Neo Con that banned hiking in the forest during summer. As I said, Neo Cons use false flag attacks to justify taking away civil liberty and this case is a prime example. Gabe Wortman didn't kill Corry Ellison. The RCMP lied and falsified that evidence.
Peter Griffon was also a police agent from that fake cartel bust in Edmonton. He was also tied to Gabe Wortman and gave ho the police decals for his car everyone knew he had. Three police agents directly involved with the biggest mass shooting in Canada in history.
Well today is world water day and IDGAF. The reason I know is because all week at work they have been pushing us to fill out an online survey about water rights. At first I thought it sounded innocent enough. Then a coworker made a sarcastic comment about water rights and gender equality.
I chuckled at the absurdity until they pointed to that exact wording in the posters scattered all over the lunch room. It went off on a huge tangent about how water rights and gender rights are tied together and we were all like WTF?
I asked a manager to explain it to me and their explanation was straight out of the Twilight Zone. Today a safety rep asked me if I had filled out the survey and I said no. They then asked do I want to and I said no. That was the end of the conversation.
Thankfully my employer makes participation in UN propaganda optional. That's normally something I'd expect to see coming from a union rep. I'm not saying water awareness is a bad thing and I'm certainly not opposed to gender equality.
I am concerned with where the UN is trying to take us with these innocent sounding ideas. The UN has a very dark agenda which is anything but innocent. So let's talk about that.
One younger coworker said in the survey they were asked ways in which they planned to save water. Now of course that question is innocent enough but is it really?
I live in Vancouver. The guide going up the gondola on Grouse mountain once called this a rain forest. I laughed and said rain forests are warm. The point is it rains a lot in the Pacific Northwest. We have dry patches in the summer and lawn watering restrictions are in place but right now we just went through another atmospheric river with over a week of heavy rain. There is no shortage of water here.
Supporters of the survey keep saying this is world water day and reference Africa where women have to carry water long distances. Obviously if the men aren't out hunting and fishing then they should share that burden. When asked for suggestions one supporter of the survey said move closer to water. Profoundly simple. Funding clean wells is also a worthy project. Back to here and the UN's agenda.
When asked what they planned to do to reduce water consumption the young coworker said take shorter showers. Easy enough but hold the door. Water is a renewable resource.
If I drink a glass of water, I urinate in the toilet and it goes to the ocean. If I wash my motorcycle or flush the toilet, that water goes to the ocean. It then evaporates and returns as rain. It's a great gig. The US wants to buy water from us? Sure. We sell it to them, it goes into the ocean and comes back as rain. Money in the bank. We've seen some pretty ridiculous things done in the name of water conservation.
They intentionally shut off the water during the Maui fire because water is sacred. They ran out of water in the LA fire because they were diverting the water for an absolutely insane reason. Some fake environmentalist said we need to divert the water to save the smelts. Small fish that live in shallow water of the ocean on the coast. They said if we don't divert the water the smelts will die. That was ridiculous. The ocean is huge.
Whether the ocean levels rise from global warming melting ice or recedes from diverted water, the smelts will always live in the shallow water on the coast. The fake environmentalism was another lie to justify holding back water in a giant fire. It never really gets diverted because if you use it in a fire or for the City's drinking water, it still ends up in the ocean in the water cycle.
The UN is conditioning us to ration water in times of fire so they can burn our forests and many of our cities to the ground. We already see that in BC's new and not so improved forest fire mismanagement. Instead of attacking the forest fire with water bombers they use helicopters with a tiny bucket and a guy with a shovel. That is a huge conspiracy everyone can see.
It goes hand in hand with saving electricity. They keep conditioning us to save electricity. My hydro bill is two tier. My flat rate in one tier and if I use more than that they charge me more per unit of electricity as a penalty.
Put that in perspective. Right now there are a lot of electric vehicles on the road. Yet that is a small percentage over all. They are trying to force us all into electric vehicles through the net zero fraud. This will put a huge burden on the power grid.
Next they will want us to save electricity by limiting our travel in those electric cars which is a direct violation of the mobility rights entrenched in the Charter of Rights. As Michael Moore pointed out in his documentary Planet of the Humans, using electric cars where the electricity is generated by industrial coal is not green. At all. It's a scam.
Nuclear power is not green either. Hydroelectric power is yet the WEF keep trashing hydroelectric power despite it's positive effect on the environmental. That's because they don't care about the environment. They care about their agenda and use fake environmentalism as an excuse to implement it.
Russia had a natural gas pipeline to Germany. That was awesome. Getting Germany off industrial coal will be a huge improvement in air quality and a huge reduction in world CO2 emissions. Twinning the Nord Stream pipeline was in everyone's best interest. Trump said he didn't want Germany to become too dependent on Russian natural gas. He wanted to sell them American coal instead. That was one giant leap backwards.
So what did Joe Biden the fake environmentalist do? He blew up the pipeline and created an energy crisis in Europe. These people don't care about the environment. They use these pretentious slogans to distract us. Banning natural gas has nothing to do with protecting the environment. We can all see that. Yet the UN's Agenda 2030 and the UN's New World Order still strives to con us into being slaves with good intentions.
Lotus Land is reporting that "Eby's reversal on decriminalization signals a new stage in BC's toxic drug crisis. The broad consensus on harm reduction has hit a wall with a public demand for more far-reaching answers to addiction, treatment, and effective enforcement."
"Premier David Eby’s dramatic appeal to Ottawa to amend BC’s decriminalization program to ban drug use in public spaces marks a turning point in the province’s eight-year-old battle with the fentanyl-driven overdose crisis. BC’s generation-long focus on harm reduction has hit a wall as fentanyl produces a wave of open drug use, hundreds of homeless, ill …"
OK so let's talk about how Harm Reduction has become Harm Promotion. John Horgan was a good man. So was Larry Campbell. Larry Campbell became the mayor of Vancouver and was compared to the TV series Da Vinci's inquest as he was also a corner who became mayor.
Larry Campbell was rightfully concerned with all the fatal drug overdoses. We all are. We differ on the most effective solution.
After that failed we opened more and more safe injections sites and turned the name to safe consumption sites which made addiction and drug overdose fatalities skyrocket.
That's when they joined Portland and came up with Decriminalization which instantly failed. It made public drug use skyrocket and public safety was at risk. So they said OK that didn't work and got rid of it yet they continue with all the well meaning insanity that got us here.
The Four Pillar program has four pillars not one. Enforcement, prevention and treatment are pivotal pillars in that program. The Portugal model succeeded because they made treatment mandatory. The political extremists failed to mention that part.
They didn't want to reduce addition they wanted to promote addiction by making it more socially acceptable.
Safe supply is a doctrine of the Devil because there's no such thing as a safe supply of harmful drugs. The primary point behind prevention is to educate the public by reinforcing the fact that harmful drugs are bad for you and you shouldn't do them. We lost that when we adapted the safe supply lie.
We abandoned the prevention pillar when we started calling lethal injection sites safe injections sites. We abandoned the prevention pillar when we sent out nurses in the DTES to show people how to use drugs safely. There's no safe way to use harmful drugs. Harmful drugs are harmful.
So just like with the failed decriminalization experiment we can all see that everything we have been doing to reduce drug fatalities has had the opposite effect. It's increased addiction and increased fatal overdoses.
As inspector John McKay pointed out, another reason the safe injection sites increased addiction and overdose fatalities is because the police created a buffer zone around the injection site where they stopped enforcing the law. Another abandonment of one of the critical four pillars - Enforcement.
Not only did they stop arresting people for using harmful drugs in public outside the safe injection sites, but they also stopped arresting drug dealers selling drugs outside the safe injection sites. The purpose of decriminalization was to arrest the drug dealers not the drug addict. Something they also failed to do.
So now Ken Sims is encouraging the VPD to arrest drug dealers in the DTES and the deranged extremists complain about a police state. Enforcing the law is one of the four pillars. Refusing to do that abandons the program and supports lawlessness - anarchy. That's what the extremists want. They want to be able to sell drugs and sell stolen goods without law enforcement stopping them. If you do that, addiction and fatalities spread like a forest fire which is exactly what we have seen.
When harm promotion failed, they said let's have a safe injection site. When fatal overdoses increased they said we need more safe injection sites. When drug overdoses continued to increase they say we need a safe supply. That is Satanic.
Not only is there no such thing as a safe supply of harmful drugs but providing free drugs to the public will instantly bankrupt our precious health care system. You can't get a MRI or cancer meds but you can get free heroin. That is how good intentions become defiantly evil at the snap of a finger. Oh snap.
Fatalities, violent crime, exploitation and human trafficking
We all see the increase addiction and fatal drug overdoses. The fake news uses those stats to emotionally blackmail us into doing bad things to help reduce the fatalities which only makes it worse. We all see the drug overdose deaths like the corner did in Da Vinci's inquest. Yet there's something else we don't see and that's everything else that goes with it.
I also liked Joel Thomas Hynes. He wasn't a big guy but he was real. As the Witcher fans would say he was authentic. I saw a picture of him in a leather jacket with a biker patch that said Preacher and said that's him. That's the guy.
I didn't want it to be about me. I wanted it to be about a list of people the Hells Angels in BC had killed including Janice Shore. A&E has since done a series about Margo Compton. I was blogging about her for years before that.
It never went anywhere so I registered the name and posted the first season on a website. If you scroll down to the bottom you'll see the first 13 names of people it would have covered.
It started off with Chris Mohan and Ed Schellenberg from the Surrey Six because that's why I started the blog. Then the Janice Shore murder really moved me. I wanted people to hear her story because that's what I mean about all the other bad things that goes along with the fatal drug overdoses. The brutal exploitation and the human trafficking. Just like Dianne Rock.
I wanted the theme song to be Dante's Prayer by Canadian Harpist Loreena Mckennitt. She wrote that moving song while reading Dante's Inferno on a train going across Siberia. Her jazz vocals lamentaded the grief and suffering she felt and observed. There's a line in the song that says remember me. I didn't want them to remember me I wanted them to remember the people who were killed and why. Remember them.
I didn't want an American company to do it because they'd probably screw it up like Hollywood or Netflix. I wanted CBC to do it. Like I said it never went anywhere so here we are. The whole point is to talk about everything else that goes along with the drug overdose fatalities. The brutal exploitation which includes human trafficking. Let's talk about that.
CTV is reporting that "Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM) has cancelled the 45th annual Clam Harbour Beach Sandcastle Competition due to dry conditions. The event was scheduled to place Sunday and typically attracts around 10,000 people." The truth is stranger than fiction. It's usually dry at the beach. How's that going to start a forest fire? Thinking is now banned.
During Covid they started coming up with insane rules that made no sense. They banned people from hiking on the local mountains. Getting fresh air and exercise is a good thing. Locking everyone down is not. It's unhealthy.
Likewise banning people from hiking in the forest because of a high forest fire risk is straight out of George Orwell. It is criminally insane and a defiant violation of the mobility rights in the Charter of Rights. It would appear that after Covid gave them an excuse to ban mobility rights, now they are hard at work thinking up new ridiculous reasons to violate our mobility rights but that's not all.
There are two aspects of how crazy this is. First is the actual act of banning hiking in the forest. The second is the extreme nature of the fine. $25,000.00 is bat sh*t crazy and grossly disproportionate compared to other offenses.
Recently I complained about getting a $100 ticket for crossing a yellow island to get into the left turn lane because the lane that was gong straight was backed up but the turning lane was empty. I pointed out that they smoke crystal meth right around the corner. Fining me for this and doing nothing about that was unequal protection of the law. It makes taxpayers angry.
Drug related violence is a big deal. Hiking is not. A $100.00 ticket for hiking would be unacceptable. A $25,000.00 ticket is criminally insane. You get less that that for drunk driving or going twice the speed limit which is a lot worse. Turns out it was $28,000.00 if you include tax and a victim surcharge. What victim? This is staking up crazy on top of crazy.
Before I get into the cause, I just want to emphasize how outrageous this fine really is. Some people claim it's because Canadians won't do anything about it. I beg to differ. Violent protests are never the answer. That's what they want. They want violent protests so they can send in their ICE Barbies to stop the protests. The reason why the government of Nova Scotia has lost their mind and overextended their boundaries is because they elected a liberal government federally but this is provincial.
Provincially they elected the Progressive Conservative Party so WTF? This is Jason Kenny Déjà vu. People want Alberta to separate from Canada because Nova Scotia is banning hiking but the guy who banned it is a Conservative!!! This is what I'm trying to tell you. There are globalists on the left AND the right.
There are two things we can learn from this. First is the obvious fact that Tim Houston is a fake Conservative just like his buddy Dough Ford who is bffs with Chrystia the WEF Freak Freeland. Alberta wants to separate because they want more freedom but they put Stephen Harper in charge of their pension. Take a look at how many times Stephen Harper spoke at the World Economic Forum and give your head a shake.
Canadians don't want that kind of centralized extremism and none of us should except this kind of crazy extremism form the Conservative Premier of Nova Scotia. Blind obedience is blind.
The other obvious anomaly is arson and forest fire mismanagement. When a known arsonists get a suspended sentence and a hiker gets a 28 thousand dollar fine, you know something isn't right. The guy was caught lighting 30 fires. He's a complete mental case. When he gets away with that we are forced to ask who was he working for?
People laugh and claim conspiracy theorists think the government is setting fires. Well someone sure is. This isn't the first case of chronic forest fire arson. Arsonists were caught setting forest fires in California, BC and Quebec. One arsonist can light many fires. I don't think they're working for the government. I think they're working for an intelligence agency just like Gabe Wortman and his common law spouse Lisa.
The CIA is operating in foreign countries and they support the globalism of the WEF. Pierre Poilievre refuses to recognize that. He denounces the WEF but supports Stephen Harper and the Intelligence community. That is a conflict of interest.
As for forest fire mismanagement in Canada we all see it. The most obvious concern is getting rid of float planes and water bombers. I saw a helicopter fighting a fire in the US and it dumped a huge amount of water on the fire just like a float plane or a water bombers. We're using a helicopter with a bucket on a string. That is bat sh*t crazy. Follow the science. More water is better than less water. That's the science.
Oh we currently have hundreds of ground crews fighting forest fires in BC. Hundreds of guys fighting hundreds of fires. Is that one guy per fire? It just rained. One water bombers is more effective than a hundred guys with a shovel. Especially when you have ground crews lighting back burns.
When you see the obvious forest fire mismanagement, chronic arsonists getting a slap on the wrist and hikers getting insane fines, we are all forced to ask what the hell is going on here?
It seems the reason they want to ban people from hiking in the forest during summer is so that no one seems any arsonists setting fires. All these arsonists that are getting caught is because there are witnesses. If there are no witnesses they won't get caught. Did you see Glenn Beck talk about the flame throwing robot dog? Forest Fires, Arson and Preignition.
Yet more proof that the rules do not apply equally in Canada. @JeffEvely was nailed with a $25,000 fine, plus taxes and victim surcharge, while people living in "forested tent encampments" who are presumably cooking and pose a major fire risk are left completely alone. pic.twitter.com/C2nQd9y5sV
CTV is reporting that "An out-of-control wildfire burning about 10 kilometres south of Lytton, B.C., has tripled in size since its discovery on Monday. The BC Wildfire Service now estimates the Cantilever Bar wildfire to be 460 hectares in size."
As the fake expert on the radio climatized us for more out of control forest fires my first question is where are the water bombers? There aren't any. This video was from 7 years ago.
Oh we stopped doing that because chemicals are bad for the environment. So is CO2. "In 2023, Canada's wildfires emitted a record amount of carbon, exceeding all other sources of emissions for the country and representing a substantial portion of global wildfire emissions."
So we're going to ban your cars and let forest fires burning out of control. We had two huge fire in Surrey recently that were quickly brought under control because they dumped a massive amount of water on them. Water is clean and green.
Previously, pilots wanted to get their commercial pilots licenses needed to get flying hours under their belt so they would volunteer fighting fires in BC. They would use water bombers and float planes. They've changed their strategy which is so less effective is screams culpability.
You fight fires with water not with back burns and a shovel. In Maui and LA they turned the water off. Just like David Eby is doing in BC. CTV is reporting that "A trio of helicopters are bucketing the fire, while 45 firefighters and structure protection personnel have been deployed on the ground." Ground crews and a trio of helicopters with tiny buckets. That's like fighting a house fire with a garden watering can.
We need water bombers and float planes like we used to use. We can all see the criminal culpability in the change in forest fire management. If climate change is real then we need to prepare for it by dumping more water on it aggressively like the Surrey Firefighters do not by climatizing us for fraud.
Fighting forest fires properly and aggressively will reduce CO2 emissions a lot more than banning cars in Canada. So will replacing industrial coal with natural gas. They obviously don't want to reduce CO2 emissions. They just want to ban cars in Canada. That's why they bombed the Nordstream pipeline. They don't want to reduce CO2 emissions, they just want to use their manufactured emergency as an excuse to embrace Communism and their New World Order.
We also need to talk about the other lie they keep repeating over and over again. Last week on the radio they were going off about how CO2 is pollution and is the biggest threat to the planet. That is a ridiculous lie.
Cars emit pollution but CO2 is part of it. CO2 is a critical part of our atmosphere just like Oxygen is. They keep claiming CO2 is poison when they push the Net Zero fraud.
Trees need CO2. If there is no CO2 all the trees die and so does all the oxygen they produce. That means we die too.The ecosystem revolves around balance.
Obviously, if there is a huge imbalance in the atmosphere that's isn't good but the claim that CO2 is pollution is a lie. If they really cared about CO2 emissions they would fight forest fires far more aggressively instead of cutting off the water.
In BC we can all see the NDP is far more concerned with enforcing evacuation orders than with fighting the fires properly. That's a Bonnie Henry thing. Volunteer fire departments used to be an important part of the community.
Progress means we try new things but if they are less efficient we go back to what is the most efficient. To do that we need to see through the lies and the first lie is the claim that CO2 is pollution when it is not. Just like the term safe supply. Both claims are a con that we need to reject.
.png)
.jpg)
