That is mentally deranged. Candace Owens simply said Rabbi Shmuley was attacking her for statements she never made and this is further evidence to that fact. In another post he stated that "I felt that since Candace got fired on Friday, I may as well try and bring her some Purim cheer by validating all her views about Jews, at least for one day."
First of all he's pretending to be drinking Christian blood. I know that Candace Owens NEVER said or implied that about Jews. That is ridiculous defamation. That erroneous claim is insane. Jews and Muslims follow the law of Moses. They don't eat pork and they don't eat blood.
Kosher killed means all the blood of the animal has to be drained out. Eating blood is not kosher and is not halal. Jews drinking Christian blood is a false stereotype which doesn't make sense that I have never heard of. Candace Owens NEVER ever said or implied that. So this is straight up dramatic defamation. He's also wearing a witches nose.
At first I was like WTF is that? A clown nose? No, it's not a clown nose. It looks like a witches nose. What the hell is that supposed to mean? Perhaps it's some obscure stereotype that Jews have big noses which again is something Candace Owens NEVER ever said.
There is a stereotype that Jews have large noses but Candace Owens Never said or quoted that. There's a nice young girl at my gym who I think is Jewish from the shape of her nose. It's not a large nose, it's a distinct shape and she's very pretty. Like Barbra Streisand.
There's also a young Punjabi girl at my gym who competes in bodybuilding that has the same shape of nose. She's very pretty and she's not Jewish. None of this has anything to do with anything Canada Owens said. It simply reinforces the fact that Rabbi Shmuley is bullying Candace Owens for statements she never made and the fake news is running with it.
I mentioned how Google has become a source of misinformation. Well in Candace Owen's case Google has become a barrage of defamation. As I said, Candace Owens expressed a very balanced concern about the Gaza conflict. She interviewed a Jew that was for it and a Jew that was against it. She did not minimize the October 7th attack. She simply expressed a concern with killing Palestinian children and civilians. That has absolutely nothing to do with Rabbi Shmuley's defamation of Candace Owens. It simply reinforces the claim that if you dare disagree with any Jewish misconduct you will be branded as an antiSemite.
When I worked on a kibbutz in Israel I attended a Passover dinner called Pesach. It was nice. It remembered the Jews Exodus from Egypt. All the volunteers were familiar with Purim which I have not attended. As far as the volunteers were concerned it was a huge party and a big drink up. Perhaps Rabbi Shmuley had a little too much alcohol to drink while making those defamatory posts. Yet since he was bulling her and threatening her it's pretty clear his defamation is with malicious intent. Or as the US courts would say, actual malice.
Previously Candace Owens made two statements about Hitler that were completely taken out of context. I am not a Holocaust denier and I am not a fan of Hitler. At all. My grandfather had mustard gas burns on his back from the trenches of the war.
People describe Hitler as a Nationalist. Canada Owens simply said that Nationalism in itself is not bad. She did not say Hitler wasn't bad she said Nationalism in itself is not bad. Most Israelis are very Nationalistic. They are proud of their country. That is not a bad thing. That is what Candace Owens said but the fake news took her statement out of context and twisted it.
They say Nelson Mandela was a Nationalist and a Socialist. Well which was it? He was a little bit of both. He was proud of his country. That is not a bad thing. He created a Constitution that protected civil liberty by law. That was a good thing.
Candace Owen's statements about Nationalism in no way implied that Hitler or the Holocaust was good because they most certainly were not. Candace Owens also said not all the books Hitler burned were bad. That doesn't mean Hitler was good. It simply means Hitler's censorship was a concern. Just like Hitler's gun control was a concern. Hitler used false flag attacks just like 9/11 and October 7th as a pretext for war. That was bad then just like it is now.
OK so let's take a deep breath and try to think this through rationally. Shmuley Boteach is a bully and a whack job. He claims no one is allowed to say Free Palestine. He claims if you say that it means you want to kill All Jews and wipe them off the face of the earth. Not so. It simply means you want the genocide to stop. Let's put it in perspective.It really is nothing short of amazing that given all of the threats that Rabbi Shmuley made against me—what seemingly disturbed Andrew (or at least what moved him to action) was my unacceptable “like” of a tweet which underscored the Rabbi’s dishonesty.
— Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) March 27, 2024
Really something.
At one point in time, Israel was under Roman occupation. According to Shmuley Boteach if a Jew was to say Free Israel at that time it meant they wanted to kill All Romans and wipe them off the face of the earth. Not so. The Romans had left their homeland to conquer Israel and were oppressing them through occupation. Saying Free Israel at that time would simply means leave us alone and let us go. Likewise, before the Exodus the Jews were slaves in Egypt.
If a Jew in slavery was to say to an Egyptian guard Free the Jews that would not mean kill All Egyptians and wipe them off the face of the earth. It would simply means let us go and leave us alone. It's the same with the Palestinians in Gaza. The Hamas mission statement is unacceptable but Mossad created Hamas and wrote that statement to drive Fatah out of Gaza and to sabotage the Oslo accord after Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated.
Shmuley Boteach claims Candace Owen liked a tweet that said "It says February 20th, Rabbi. Are you drunk on Christian blood again?" I can't see who liked what but there were many comments in that thread. One reply in that thread on the day in question said "A literal 'whatcha doin, Rabbi?' lol." It then linked to several articles where people faked acts of antisemitism.
As I said, the erogenous claim of Jews drinking blood is offensive like eating pork. However, one could say he is figurative drunk on Palestinian blood because he has no remorse for a modern genocide which is rationalized by the law of the Amorites. As I said, in Exodus 9 Moses recounts Israel's disobedience. The Palestinians are NOT the Amorites. Moses commanded Israel to vex not the stranger nor oppress him. Playing the race card when someone objects to the slaughter of civilians in Gaza is offensive. The Palestinians are not all Muslims. Some are Christians.
Good morning.
— Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) March 14, 2024
If you do not wish to buy the Rabbi’s butt plugs and dildos, you are both antisemitic and sexually repressed.
Sexual repression is *checks notes* the latest form of antisemitism and neo-Stalinism. pic.twitter.com/Y9P5KzRTLM
