Monday, April 28, 2025

Man accused in fatal Edmonton shooting

CBC is reporting that "A man charged in a fatal Edmonton shooting had finished serving time behind bars for accessory to murder just a few weeks before being accused in a murder case. Jerad Wuttunee, 36, was charged earlier this month in the shooting death of 52-year-old Darrell Demchuk. Court records show Wuttunee was among a group of four adults previously charged with first-degree murder in the deaths of two people in January 2021."

"Wuttunee was previously arrested in Vancouver on Jan. 31, 2023 — more than two years after police began investigating a pair of homicides on Edmonton's south side. In that case, 29-year-old Deidre Aldridge and 30-year-old Daniel Grandbois were found dead at a home in the McKernan neighbourhood."

"An agreed statement of facts in the court record says a woman who lived in the home's basement suite reported to police on Jan. 6, 2021, that she'd seen people she didn't know bring a "badly beaten and bloodied" woman downstairs, and on the main floor, she saw a man who was beaten and tied up in a bedroom."

"Police arrived at the house to find the back door open, and the bodies of Aldridge and Grandbois inside. It appeared that they were "being prepared to be removed from the residence," the agreed facts say. Aldridge was hog-tied with an electrical cord and wrapped in a carpet secured with tape, while Grandbois was also wrapped in a carpet with his hands tied behind his back."

"Both victims had numerous injuries, with the cause of death ruled as multiple stab wounds to the head and neck. An autopsy found Aldridge also had blunt force injuries, fractured bones and evidence of neck compression. She'd been stabbed more than 20 times. The case concluded without anyone being found criminally responsible for killing Aldrige or Grandbois."

That is totally f*cked up.

16 year old injured after shooting in St. Catharines nightclub

The Toronto Star is reporting that "A 16-year-old boy is injured after a shooting inside a St. Catharines club past midnight on Sunday, police say. Just before 12:45 a.m., officers patrolling the downtown core responded to the sounds of gunshots coming from St. Paul Street, officials said in a news release."

"At the scene, police found a multitude of people running from Club 88, and the 16-year-old victim from Ajax was found outside the club. He was taken to hospital, and his injuries were deemed non life-threatening, investigators added. Officials believe the shooting took place inside the club near the bathroom, but the circumstances that led up to it 'remain part of the active and ongoing investigation,' police said."

OK is says the shooting took place inside the nightclub and the 16 year old was injured outside the nightclub. Doesn't say he was shot. He could have been trampled. What is a 16 year old kid doing outside a nightclub at 12:45 AM?

The GTA has a lot of juvenile delinquents running around with illegal guns who have no respect for law and order. 

CHCH is reporting that the 16 year old was shot. So was he shot inside the nightclub or outside the nightclub. What was a 16 year old doing in a nightclub after midnight and how did they get a gun past security?


Sunday, April 27, 2025

Bill Majcher and CSIS' illegal op using MI 6 as a cover

As I mentioned, Global News spoke with Bill Majcher after his appearance in Vancouver court April 15th 2025. They cited some pretty shocking information found in an Information to Obtain the RCMP used to get a search warrant for various email accounts used by Bill Majcher. 

Their whole case appears to revolve around false allegations about Bill Majcher's involvement with Chinese real estate magnate Kevin Sun. Kevin was at one time wanted by the Chinese authorities but no longer is. Bill had nothing to do with him. Case closed. Add that to the false allegations about the screen shot from the movie and the case has fallen apart.  

It made a great headline though. Global's interview cited some highly sensitive information that was disclosed in the ITO but should not have been. Bill Majcher refused to comment on those allegations. However, there is something else of interest in that ITO. (Information to Obtain) I'm not going to mention parts of it because IMO that should never have been released. 

However, since CSIS is on a defamation campaign let's look at what CSIS admitted to in their own evidence. CSIS was created under an act of Parliament. CSIS is only legally permitted to operate within Canada. It is not legally permitted to operate extraterritorially. So let's look at CSIS' own evidence and see how they admit they broke the law. 

An excerpt from the ITO the Crown submitted to the court states: "Around 2012-2013, the CSIS member contacted MAJCHER and tried to recruit him to conduct a covert intelligence gathering operation on CSIS's behalf."

"A few months later, MAJCHER had further meetings with CSIS in Canada in that regard; In a subsequent meeting in Hong Kong, MAJCHER met with a British intelligence Ml-6 representative. Ml-6 would be co-running this joint operation with CSIS;" 

"During subsequent meetings outside China, MAJCHER was provided by CSIS with material and secure communication devices and informed on protocols;  This whole intelligence gathering operation ran approximately for less than 24 months and ended in 2014 or early 2015."

So CSIS admit Majcher worked for them for two years. 

The CSIS member handling MAJCHER indicated to him that Ml-6 involvement was CSIS' way to circumvent Canadian laws which did not allow CSIS to operate extraterritorially at that time. MAJCHER stated to be troubled by this, and to fear having become unwittingly ensnared in an operation not sanctioned by Canadian law;" Did you catch that?

In the Crowns own evidence they admit CSIS intentionally broke the law. They are not legally authorized to operate outside of Canada so the used MI6 as a cover to let them break the law. 

Where does the budget for that come from? 

Clearly we have the wrong person on trial here. When tax dollars are used illegally, who is responsible? Please advise.

The only other item left in the charges against Bill Majcher is the claim that he was willing to negotiate Meng Wanzhou's realse. How is that a bad thing? She was the Huawei CFO arrested in a trade war. England can sell Iran nukes but China can't sell them cell phones. GMAFB. He was willing to help negotiate the release of the two Michaels. How is that a bad thing? 

There is information in that ITO that directly relates to the Cameron Ortis case. What CSIS hired Bill to do in Hong Kong was exactly what Cam claimed a foreign intelligence agency asked him to do. The Five Eyes are just burning another asset. 

Bill Majcher's crime? The answer is found in Paul Palango's book Dispersing the Fog pages 253-255. Bill was critical of the RCMP. Just like Allen Dalstrom who was fired for making  a statement critical of the RCMP in Julian Sher's book The Road to Hell.

Trump's approval rating falling


The plus and minus is referring to above or below 50%.




Saturday, April 26, 2025

SUV drives into crowd at Vancouver festival

Update: Driver charged with counts of murder

CBC is reporting that "Vancouver police say several people have been killed and multiple others injured after a vehicle drove into a crowd at a street festival Saturday evening. The incident happened shortly after 8 p.m. near East 41st Avenue and Fraser Street, where the Lapu Lapu Day Block Party was taking place. Police said the driver is in custody."

6AK_TV posted some videos from the scene of the aftermath. 


Rand Paul denounces tariffs

The Hill is reporting that "Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Wednesday that it is a “fallacy” to think tariffs will help the country’s economy as President Trump gears up to impose massive reciprocal tariffs on U.S. trading partners. Paul, who has spoken out against tariffs previously, joined The Hill’s Rising on Wednesday, where he discussed his disagreement with tariffs, calling them a tax.”

“On tariffs, I think it’s just economically — it’s a fallacy to think that it’ll help the country,” the Kentucky senator said. “Tariffs are a tax, and if you tax trade or if you tax anything, you’ll get less of it.” Exactly. Tariffs are the new Carbon tax. 

The Independent is reporting that "Republican Senator Rand Paul has warned his party that tariffs have decimated politics after he voted against President Donald Trump’s duties on Canadian imports yesterday. Sen. Paul of Kentucky told Fox News that tariffs have historically brought down his party."

“'When McKinley put tariffs on in 1890, they lost 50 percent of their seats… When Smoot-Hawley put their tariffs In the early 1930s, we lost the House and Senate for 60 years,' Sen. Paul said. 'So not only bad economically, they are bad politically.'”

"After Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs slapped 25 percent tariffs on Canadian imports and a minimum 10 percent duty on all countries, the Kentucky senator crafted the opposition resolution with Democrat Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia."

"Four Republicans, including Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, and Susan Collins of Maine, joined every Democratic senator in voting against Canadian duties."

"In a 51-48 vote, they rejected Trump's declaration of a national emergency earlier this year to justify tariffs on Canadian imports. In a rare move, Sen. Paul and Sen. Kaine, who ran as vice presidential candidate against Trump and Mike Pence in 2016, also made a joint appearance on Fox News to explain the impact on Americans and why their resolution is important."

Thousands of Israelis defy police orders to protest war in Gaza

Conservatives and Far right are very different

Since we're here and while we wait for the results of Monday's federal election in Canada lets talk about extremism and the difference between Conservative principles and the far right because they are polar opposites.

Conservatives believe in small government, less taxes and more freedom. The far left believe in the opposite but so do the far right. Usually we say draw a line in the sand and call that democracy. The further you go away from that line to the left or the right, the farther away from democracy you go and the closer you get to Dictatorship. 

A right wing dictator is no different from a left wing dictator. Fascism and Communism are pretty much the same. It's all about more government control and less individual freedom. 

Yet conservative values are very different from Fascism and the far right. Brian Mulroney was not a Conservative but he was far right. He was a tax and spend pork barrel politician. He was the reason the Reform Party was created. The Reform party wasn't far right. They were left of Brian Mulroney. The reform party was concerned with fiscal responsibility and reducing the debt. 

Preston Manning challenged us to see beyond the left and right. He challenged us to look at the issues and unite the bright. Sadly a typo changed unite the bright to unite the right and they ran with it. They ended up merging with the fake conservatives they were created to oppose and Harper hijacked the dream. 

The PPC is not the Reform Party. The PPC is right of the federal Conservatives. Maxime Bernier is not more conservative than Pierre Poilievre. Maxime Bernier is further right that Pierre Poilievre. Maxime Bernier is more of a Donald Trump. His position on immigration is more extreme than Pierre Poilievre. 

Brian Mulroney was far right just like Stephen Harper. Brian Mulroney was the reason the Reform party was created and Stephen Harper merged back with that far right just to get elected. Brian Mulroney had the GST while Stephen Harper had the HST. Both were enemies of the Charter of Rights. 

Candice Malcolm from True North is very sincere and completely genuine. I enjoyed her fake news Friday videos. Yet she met her husband campaigning for Stephen Harper. Stephen Harper was not as sincere and genuine as Candice Malcolm. Stephen Harper was a scoundrel like Lyn Brian Mulroney. 

I noticed that Candice Malcolm changed the name of True North to Juno News recently but I just realized in so doing she teamed up with Keean Bexte who used to be with Rebel News but broke off to create the Counter Signal. Keean Bexte is also sincere and genuine. Ezra Levant is not. Ezra Levant is an obvious front for Mossad who created Hamas and assassinated Yitzhak Rabin. Those sinister acts had an agenda and promoting conservative values was not part of it. 

I saw a documentary on YouTube about the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin. It erroneously claimed that the Oslo accord was an agreement that would have never worked. That is a lie. They killed the agreement when they assassinated Yitzhak Rabin and created Hamas. The PLO agreed to a ceasefire. The Oslo accord worked. That's why Mossad created Hamas. 

The other day someone said to me so and so is voting Liberal. They were disgusted. Personally I don't care. I disagree with that decision but that is their right. People are allowed to vote for whoever they want. When I was growing up my father wouldn't tell my mother who he was voting for until after the election. He wanted her to make up her own mind. 

The other day a younger coworker asked me my opinion about the upcoming election. She wanted to know who to vote for. I told her what the different parties believed in as well as pros and cons of each party. I'm not going to tell her who to vote for. That's her decision. 

She said she's an immigrant. She has a lot of friends who are immigrants. That is an important issue for her. I get it. It's an important issue for me too. All this immigrant hate has been manufactured. It's a distraction with an agenda. I believe in balancing the extremes. In Israel the far right has produced some brutal extremes that I oppose. 

In Canada letting immigrants come to Canada and work is great. Paying immigrants not to work isn't. It's that simple.

Donald Trump and the Road to Fascism


Israel’s far-right security minister to visit Yale Jewish society day after Mar-a-Lago dinner

The Guardian is reporting that "Israel’s far-right national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir was set to address a meeting at a Yale University Jewish society, a day after being honored at a lavish dinner at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort." 

"Ben-Gvir, who has past convictions for supporting terrorism and was considered persona non grata under the Biden administration, attended a fundraising event at the Florida resort on Tuesday, where he told attendees about harsh new measures implemented against Palestinian prisoners."

That includes torturing and sexually assaulting prisoners and the murder of that famous surgeon for helping the wounded. 

"Ben-Gvir, a hardline Jewish settler from the occupied West Bank who has advocated for the deportation of all Arab citizens, has been an integral part of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition since 2022, and has threatened to leave his side should the war in Gaza end."

"Ben-Gvir was convicted in 2007 of racist incitement and support for groups on terrorism blacklists. For years, he prominently displayed a photo in his living room of Baruch Goldstein, who massacred 29 Muslim worshippers in Hebron in 1994. In 2022, the Biden administration condemned Ben-Gvir’s visit to the memorial of violently racist and anti-Palestinian rabbi Meir Kahane, whom the national security minister was a follower of in his youth."

Wikipedia is reporting that "He has a long history of anti-Arab activism leading to dozens of indictments and at least eight convictions of crimes including incitement to racism and support for, as well as possession of propaganda of, a terrorist organization (the now illegal political party Kach).[7] As a lawyer, he is known for defending Jews accused of Jewish extremist terrorism on trial in Israel."

'Ben-Gvir is known for being a provocateur and has grabbed headlines for a variety of reasons; threatening Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin on live television in 1995 shortly before his assassination, having had a portrait in his living room of Baruch Goldstein, a Jewish extremist terrorist and mass murderer." Murder you get gain. That is Gadianton. 

Friday, April 25, 2025

Cody Haevischer not allowed to subpoena crown prosecutor in his appeal. Person Y in the WPP.

There is a new decision posted on the BC Supreme court's website about Cody Haevischer's application for a judicial stay for his murder charge in the Surrey Six. 

Cody is the last surviving suspect in the Surrey Six who hasn't rolled. Jamie Bacon, the one who ordered the murder rolled. DK rolled. Mat Johnston mysteriously died of cancer right after Jamie Bacon risked his family's life by making that audio recording trying to convince Mathew Johnston to join Jamie Bacon in the Witness Protection Program. 

That whole investigation has been a shameful disgrace. Jamie Bacon won an appeal over trial delays and the Crown won their Appeal of the Appeal. Then IHITit lets Jamie Bacon into the Program. What a complete waste of tax dollars. If that isn't organized crime, I don't know what is.

Anyways, Cody's application for a judicial stay seemingly involved Person Y. We all know who that is. Person X became person Y and you know who became Person X. 

[5] "The allegations made by Mr. Haevischer against the Crown, and personally against Mr. Levitz, have been described in previous rulings: see, in particular, R. v. Haevischer, 2024 BCSC 1635 at paras. 28–34, 52–65 [WPP Disclosure Ruling]."

[6] "The allegations all relate to Person Y, a former criminal associate of Mr. Haevischer who cooperated with police, including as an agent, during their investigation into the murders of six people on October 19, 2007, in Surrey, B.C., known publicly as the 'Surrey Six murders'. Person Y subsequently testified for the Crown at Mr. Haevischer’s trial for those murders. By the time of the trial, Person Y was serving sentences of life imprisonment for two murders unrelated to the Surrey Six case: WPP Disclosure Ruling at para. 5."

[7] "As part of his application for a stay of proceedings, Mr. Haevischer alleges that Mr. Levitz and other trial Crown counsel deliberately and wrongfully withheld information about the entry of Person Y into the federal witness protection program (the 'WPP'), in violation of the Crown’s first-party disclosure obligations. Person Y entered the WPP on April 6, 2014, mere days after concluding his testimony: WPP Disclosure Ruling at para. 8."

First of all I'm not sure that's relevant to anything. Person Y is a hero. Cody isn't denying his involvement in the Surrey Six. His lawyer claims because the Crown failed to disclose that Person Y had entered the Witness Protection Program he should be set free. I think not. That would violate the need for natural justice. 

Just like letting Jamie Bacon off for trial delays caused by the RCMP trying to cover up police misconduct would also violate natural justice. In this decision Madame Justice Martha M. Devlin quashed Mr. Levitz’s subpoena. [38]

Martha M. Devlin is a familiar name. She is also presiding over Bill Majcher's bogus case. She will see through CSIS' lies. In February 2025 Martha M. Devlin dismissed Cody's lawyer's application to cross examine nine witnesses as it was premature. There is a whole list of decisions on that case

So I get it. Natural justice demands someone take responsibility for the Surrey Six but letting Jamie Bacon off after all the IHIT misconduct was the straw that broke the camel's back. The RCMP completely screwed up that case. The Crown didn't. The RCMP did and I don't think Matt Johnston died of cancer. 

So I guess the big breaking news today is a confirmation of our suspicions. April 6, 2014 Person Y entered the Witness Protection Program after he testified in the Surrey Six Trial.

The recent decision confirms that "By the time of the trial, Person Y was serving sentences of life imprisonment for two murders unrelated to the Surrey Six case." [6] So I would assume that when he entered the Witness Protection Program he didn't have to finish his sentence. 

That's kind of what we suspected. Several years ago someone said they were giving a guy grief because he thought the guy was a rat and was in the Program. Then he got a call from the guy in prison on a burner phone. The guy put Person Y on the phone to prove he was in jail not in the program. That's when I thought isn't Person Y in the program? Turns out he was. That means the guy he was giving grief to was as well. 

As for paragraph [5] Person Y was not motivated by revenge. That was obvious. I can't say any more about that without naming him. We all know who he was and we all know revenge had nothing to do with it. He did something right because the Surrey Six was f*cked up. Jamie Bacon wanted Person Y to do it and he said no. I have no problem with letting Person Y into the program without finishing his sentence. 

All the others is a completely different matter. The current state of IHIT and the CFSEU is completely compromised. Person Y did something significant so they let him into the program. Jamie Bacon did SFA and they let him into the program for doing nothing. That was an abomination.

Letting Blaze into the program to lie about a rival instead of serving his sentence was disgusting. Paying Blaze and the rat pack all that money to lie about Cory Vallee was disgusting. Now they are going to pay them another obscene amount of money to lie about Conor D'Monte. 

The only witness to Kevin LeClair's murder saw two shooters. One was noticeably larger than the either. That was K9. Both were wearing masks. The smaller shooter's gun jammed. The larger shooter finished the job. 

Conor D'Monte and Cory Vallee are the same size. One of them is innocent. You already wrongfully convicted Cory. You can't convict them both because they're both the same size. You are paying Blaze's rent in Abbotsford while he sells crystal meth to a vulnerable person he rents out his front lawn to park a trailer on. Paying him to lie about Conner knowing he is currently selling crystal meth and is lying about Conner simply means I'll see you in hell. What we do in life, echoes in eternity.