There is a new decision posted on the BC Supreme court's website about Cody Haevischer's application for a judicial stay for his murder charge in the Surrey Six.
Cody is the last surviving suspect in the Surrey Six who hasn't rolled. Jamie Bacon, the one who ordered the murder rolled. DK rolled. Mat Johnston mysteriously died of cancer right after Jamie Bacon risked his family's life by making that audio recording trying to convince Mathew Johnston to join Jamie Bacon in the Witness Protection Program.
That whole investigation has been a shameful disgrace. Jamie Bacon won an appeal over trial delays and the Crown won their Appeal of the Appeal. Then IHITit lets Jamie Bacon into the Program. What a complete waste of tax dollars. If that isn't organized crime, I don't know what is.
Anyways, Cody's application for a judicial stay seemingly involved Person Y. We all know who that is. Person X became person Y and you know who became Person X.
[5] "The allegations made by Mr. Haevischer against the Crown, and personally against Mr. Levitz, have been described in previous rulings: see, in particular, R. v. Haevischer, 2024 BCSC 1635 at paras. 28–34, 52–65 [WPP Disclosure Ruling]."
[6] "The allegations all relate to Person Y, a former criminal associate of Mr. Haevischer who cooperated with police, including as an agent, during their investigation into the murders of six people on October 19, 2007, in Surrey, B.C., known publicly as the 'Surrey Six murders'. Person Y subsequently testified for the Crown at Mr. Haevischer’s trial for those murders. By the time of the trial, Person Y was serving sentences of life imprisonment for two murders unrelated to the Surrey Six case: WPP Disclosure Ruling at para. 5."
[7] "As part of his application for a stay of proceedings, Mr. Haevischer alleges that Mr. Levitz and other trial Crown counsel deliberately and wrongfully withheld information about the entry of Person Y into the federal witness protection program (the 'WPP'), in violation of the Crown’s first-party disclosure obligations. Person Y entered the WPP on April 6, 2014, mere days after concluding his testimony: WPP Disclosure Ruling at para. 8."
First of all I'm not sure that's relevant to anything. Person Y is a hero. Cody isn't denying his involvement in the Surrey Six. His lawyer claims because the Crown failed to disclose that Person Y had entered the Witness Protection Program he should be set free. I think not. That would violate the need for natural justice.
Just like letting Jamie Bacon off for trial delays caused by the RCMP trying to cover up police misconduct would also violate natural justice. In this decision Madame Justice Martha M. Devlin quashed Mr. Levitz’s subpoena. [38]
Martha M. Devlin is a familiar name. She is also presiding over Bill Majcher's bogus case. She will see through CSIS' lies. In February 2025 Martha M. Devlin dismissed Cody's lawyer's application to cross examine nine witnesses as it was premature. There is a whole list of decisions on that case.
So I get it. Natural justice demands someone take responsibility for the Surrey Six but letting Jamie Bacon off after all the IHIT misconduct was the straw that broke the camel's back. The RCMP completely screwed up that case. The Crown didn't. The RCMP did and I don't think Matt Johnston died of cancer.
So I guess the big breaking news today is a confirmation of our suspicions. April 6, 2014 Person Y entered the Witness Protection Program after he testified in the Surrey Six Trial.
The recent decision confirms that "By the time of the trial, Person Y was serving sentences of life imprisonment for two murders unrelated to the Surrey Six case." [6] So I would assume that when he entered the Witness Protection Program he didn't have to finish his sentence.
That's kind of what we suspected. Several years ago someone said they were giving a guy grief because he thought the guy was a rat and was in the Program. Then he got a call from the guy in prison on a burner phone. The guy put Person Y on the phone to prove he was in jail not in the program. That's when I thought isn't Person Y in the program? Turns out he was. That means the guy he was giving grief to was as well.
As for paragraph [5] Person Y was not motivated by revenge. That was obvious. I can't say any more about that without naming him. We all know who he was and we all know revenge had nothing to do with it. He did something right because the Surrey Six was f*cked up. Jamie Bacon wanted Person Y to do it and he said no. I have no problem with letting Person Y into the program without finishing his sentence.
All the others is a completely different matter. The current state of IHIT and the CFSEU is completely compromised. Person Y did something significant so they let him into the program. Jamie Bacon did SFA and they let him into the program for doing nothing. That was an abomination.
Letting Blaze into the program to lie about a rival instead of serving his sentence was disgusting. Paying Blaze and the rat pack all that money to lie about Cory Vallee was disgusting. Now they are going to pay them another obscene amount of money to lie about Conor D'Monte.
The only witness to Kevin LeClair's murder saw two shooters. One was noticeably larger than the either. That was K9. Both were wearing masks. The smaller shooter's gun jammed. The larger shooter finished the job.
Conor D'Monte and Cory Vallee are the same size. One of them is innocent. You already wrongfully convicted Cory. You can't convict them both because they're both the same size. You are paying Blaze's rent in Abbotsford while he sells crystal meth to a vulnerable person he rents out his front lawn to park a trailer on. Paying him to lie about Conner knowing he is currently selling crystal meth and is lying about Conner simply means I'll see you in hell. What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
They have to finish sentence in most cases
ReplyDelete