The Net Zero 2030 Fraud at YVR

Yesterday I picked up my son from the airport and drove past a large building with a huge sign that said Net Zero 2030. They are speeding up the 2050 Agenda. I read it out loud and said, great. This is a huge in your face fraud of the Alice in Wonderland Era that Donald Trump's Fascism and Netanyahu's atrocities can't distract us from.

Net Zero 2030 is a UN catch phrase promoting their New World Order. The slogan Net Zero has absolutely nothing to do with protecting the environment. It is solely based on fake environmentalism to justify a very dark political agenda. 

As Michael Moore pointed out in his documentary Planet of the Humans, plugging electric cars into a grid that is generated by industrial coal is not green. It is defiant hypocrisy. Banning natural gas is not Green. It is defiant hypocrisy. 

We all know that pollution is bad. We get it but natural gas is clean burning. When West Vancouver converted from heating homes with coal to heating homes with natural gas, the air quality instantly improved. Industrial coal is the largest source of CO2 emissions on the planet. Event the obsession with CO2 is a misleading distraction. 

Net Zero implies zero CO2 emissions which would mean all plant life on earth dies because they need CO2 to survive. That would also mean all human and animal life dies because they need the oxygen the plants and trees produce. That is the ecosystem we live in. Plants and trees take in CO2 and give off oxygen. Humans and animals take in oxygen and give off CO2. 

So Net Zero literally means no more animal or human life which in turn would mean no more plants or trees. That's not very green. Farming is the greenest thing you can do for the planet. Banning fertilizer has nothing to do with protecting the environment. It's an attack on farming to create global food shortages to stop population growth. 

Banning water has nothing to do with protecting the environment. Water is a renewable resource. Once it's used it evaporates and returns as rain. Banning the use of large quantities of water in fighting forest fires is not protecting the environment it's killing it. Yet the primary concern revolves around natural gas and industrial coal. 

Germany phasing out their industrial coal plants with natural gas would be a colossal improvement in air quality and global CO2 emissions. Bombing the NordStream pipeline had nothing to do with protecting the environment. It was a direct attack on the environment. So this Net Zero fraud needs to be confronted.

Right now it's just as important as confronting Donald Trump's Fascism and Netanyahu's atrocities because it's far more subtle. It's a lie they keep repeating in hopes people will eventually believe it. We also need to phase out spraying the forests with glyphosate because that's bad for the environment. Net Zero 2030 really means the UN's Agenda 2030 for a New World Order. Meaning a one world Communist government. 

Another definition Net Zero is when human-caused carbon dioxide emissions are balanced by removing an equivalent amount from the atmosphere. Removed how? 

"Carbon dioxide ( CO2) is removed from the atmosphere through natural processes like photosynthesis (trees, plants, algae) and ocean absorption." No kidding. 

Reducing deforestation is another important factor. The use of glyphosate and banning the use of large quantities of water in fighting forest fires, increase deforestation. 

So do back burns and pre ignitions. By intentionally burning down the forests they are reducing the amount of CO2 consumed through photosynthesis which in turn will require more emission cuts to justify their Agenda. Here's a thought. Stop burning down the forests.

Carbon dioxide ( CO2) is also removed from the atmosphere through direct air capture. Another crazy idea to make it look like they're doing something when in reality they're not. Their fake environmentalism is just making it worse. 

Forest fires in Canada produce far more CO2 than all the cars do. So let's go back to the more effective ways of fighting forest fires with water bombers instead of buckets and shovels and stop using glyphosate. We also need to stop using back burns and pre ignitions. We have seen how that has done far more damage than good. Here's the theory. 

A forest fire starts and the wind blows it in one direction. The light a back burn or a pre ignition ahead of the fire so the fire will run out of fuel by the time it gets to the back burn. The problem with the theory is the obvious - wind.

If the wind is blowing a fire in a certain direction and you light a back burning ahead of that fire so it runs out of fuel, how on earth is the wind that's bowing the fire towards you going to blow the back burn toward the fire? It's not and we have seen countless examples of how back burns have made a bad fire much worse. So stop it. The problem is pollution not CO2. 

Save the planet by planting trees not by burning it to the ground.