Update: Inside Project Servo - Asian Pacific Post PDF
"How a major RCMP national security prosecution, launched amid a public outcry over China’s interference in Canada, was hobbled even before the trial opens. Majcher is charged with one count under the Security of Information Act. The Crown alleges that in May and June 2017, he acted at the direction of, for the benefit of, or in association with authorities in the People’s Republic of China in an effort to induce Vancouver-area businessman Hongwei 'Kevin' Sun to repatriate himself and his assets to China. Sun, however, has publicly said he was never approached or pressured by Majcher and had no connection to him in that context."
As I previously reported "Their whole case appears to revolve around false allegations about Bill Majcher's involvement with Chinese real estate magnate Kevin Sun. Kevin was at one time wanted by the Chinese authorities but no longer is. Bill had nothing to do with him. Case closed. Add that to the false allegations about the screen shot from the movie and the case has fallen apart. It made a great headline though."
The Vancouver Sun is reporting that "Days before the start of William Majcher’s trial on charges of helping the Chinese government on Canadian soil, a B.C. Supreme Court judge has ruled the arrest of the retired high-ranking RCMP officer was premature and illegal. The trial begins Monday and will test the prosecutor’s theory that the retired RCMP inspector is guilty of one count of preparatory acts to commit an offence under the Security of Information Act."
Preparatory acts - what an obscene joke. Another thought crime. They claim he was going to do something but never did. The time limits are up for f*ck's sake. That whole case has been a complete scam. CSIS used MI6 as a cover to run an illegal op in Hong Kong. Save Canada. Arrest CSIS.
Rex v. William Robert Majcher March 26 2026 Decision
[8] Before describing the evidence adduced on this voir dire, I will briefly address two preliminary matters. The first relates to the circumstances of Mr. Majcher’s arrest. The officer who arrested Mr. Majcher was Corporal Chady Khoury. Subsequent to the arrest, Cpl. Khoury conducted two post-arrest interviews of Mr. Majcher on July 18 and 19, 2023, following which he released Mr. Majcher from custody. On a previous application, I found Mr. Majcher’s post-arrest statements to be voluntary: Voluntariness Ruling.
[10] Secondly, prior to this application Mr. Majcher brought an application challenging the lawfulness of a warranted search at the residence of Kenneth Marsh, conducted by the Project Severo investigation on June 14, 2023. As part of the application, the Crown conceded that Mr. Majcher had standing to challenge the search of Mr. Marsh’s residence because the search yielded electronic communications between Mr. Marsh and Mr. Majcher located on two computers. I found that that the search warrant could not have issued based on the Information to Obtain (“ITO”) affirmed in support of the warrant because the ITO did not provide the issuing justice a basis to conclude that an offence had been committed under s. 20 of SOIA (i.e., the offence under investigation identified in the ITO): see R. v. Majcher, 2025 BCSC 2576 [Marsh Search Ruling].
Conclusion
[91] For the foregoing Reasons, Mr. Majcher’s application is granted. I find that his arrest on July 18, 2023, violated his right not to be arbitrarily detained, as protected by s. 9 of the Charter.
Rex v. William Robert Majcher March 30 2026 Decision
Rex v. William Robert Majcher April 1 2026 Decision
Rex v. William Robert Majcher April 17 2026 Decision
[2] During the pre-trial stage of the proceedings, it was understood that Mr. Majcher would be tried by a judge and jury, given that an accused is deemed to elect this mode of trial after a direct indictment has been preferred, pursuant to s. 565(2) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46 [Code]. However, on April 7, 2026, Mr. Majcher re-elected to be tried by judge alone, pursuant to the same section of the Code.
Rex v. William Robert Majcher October 21 2025 Decision
Rex v. William Robert Majcher December 17 2025 Decision
Rex v. William Robert Majcher December 24 2025 Decision
Rex v. William Robert Majcher December 31 2025 Decision
[3] On this application, Mr. Majcher alleges a breach of his right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure, as protected by s. 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms [Charter], arising from searches conducted pursuant to what he says is an invalid search warrant. In particular, Mr. Majcher challenges the facial validity of an information to obtain (“ITO”) affirmed by Corporal Gabriel Lemaire (the “Affiant”) on June 1, 2023, filed in support of a search warrant issued pursuant to s. 487 of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46 [Code]. The warrant sought by the Affiant was issued on June 8, 2023. The search warrant authorized the search of the residence of Kenneth “Kim” Marsh, located on Ontario Street in Vancouver, BC (the “Marsh residence”), and the search of various electronic devices located therein. The warrant was executed at the Marsh residence by members of the “C” Division of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (“RCMP”) on June 14, 2023.
Conclusion
[82] Based on my consideration of the totality of the ITO, I am not satisfied that the issuing justice could have reasonably inferred that an offence had been committed, and thus that a search of the Marsh residence would afford evidence of the offence. Therefore, the requirements of s. 487 of the Code have not been met. I conclude that the warrant could not have properly issued and I consequently find a breach of Mr. Majcher’s right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure, as protected by s. 8 of the Charter.
[83] For the foregoing Reasons, Mr. Majcher’s application is granted.
Originally Willaim Majcher was charged in BC Provincial court but the Crown withdrew those charges and refiled in BC Supreme court right before the time limits expired.
According to the Jordan rule governing the right to a fair and speedy trial, the clock starts when charges are laid and runs until the actual or anticipated end of the trial.
If the trial extends beyond 18 or 30 months (minus defense-caused delays), the delay is presumed unreasonable.
Bill was illegally arrested July 18 2023 and in Provincial court the Jordan rule ran out after 18 months. By refiling in Supreme court they extended that deadline to Jan 2026 which has already past so the whole thing is still a complete scam.
Get this, if his arrest was illegal because there wasn't enough grounds to arrest him their sure isn't enough evidence to convict him. This fraud was put into motion by the FBI.
How a major RCMP national security prosecution, launched amid a public outcry over China’s interference in Canada, was hobbled even before the trial opens. https://t.co/L0RlaULKxA
— Robert Fife (@RobertFife) April 19, 2026
