Charlie Kirk was not shot with a 30-06. Do the math.
My comment reply function is malfunctioning. The fact that Charlie Kirk was not shot with a 30-06 has nothing to do with Candace Owens. It's obvious. Mocking that fact is not only ridiculous, it is straight up Satanic. You're covering up the murder of Charlie Kirk. The official narrative is absurd.
Charlie Kirk was shot with a smaller caliber bullet from his rear right. It severed his spinal cord and made his head buckle slightly. That was a professional shot. This was clearly an intelligence operation and Kash Heed is a lying POS sent in by Donald Trump to cover it up. The swamp has not changed.
CBC is reporting that "Surrey police investigating as people allegedly return fire after home targeted by extortion." AYFKM? "A Surrey, BC, police spokesperson confirms that an extortion-related shooting on Saturday saw people in the targeted residence try to shoot back." Heaven forbid.
"The shooting in the Bear Creek neighbourhood did not result in any injuries, and police confirmed Monday that they're looking into reports that people in the residence allegedly fired back."
CBC is also reporting that "Police probing 35th case of suspected extortion in Surrey, B.C, this year." Under Canadian law people are authorized to use reasonable force against a violent attack. Reasonable force against a lethal attack is lethal force. Investigating someone for shooting back when the number of extortion related shootings run rampant is insane and immoral. The preamble to the Canadian Charter of Rights states that We believe in the supremacy of God and the rule of law." It does not say we support the lawlessness we are now witnessing with all this extortion violence.
If you shoot back you do have to be aware what's behind your target so no innocent bystander gets hit but for f*ck sakes. Investigating someone for shooting back is absolutely shameful. All this extortion is tied to CSIS and the government of India.
Well I finally traded in my old motorcycle and got a new ride, a used Triumph America. Every bike has pros and cons. I really liked my old bike. That's why I put over 150,000 km on it.
Elspeth Beard. Riding and camping. That's what it's all about.
Yesterday when I rode in to work in the morning it was one degree, dark, foggy and frosty. I thought great first day back on the motorcycle and there's black ice. It wasn't too bad but the road was wet and frosty so I took it easy. Today was minus one.
I think I'll make a separate post about safe riding practices. I'm not a speed demon but I have ridden full seasons for many years and do have some experience with motorcycle safety.
I've seen a lot of guys with mangled injuries from being hit on a motorcycle. Some things you can't avoid but you just have to assume no one can see you. Especially when it's dark out and raining. You also have to drive for the conditions. Racing around like an idiot on wet or frosty roads is unwise.
It's taking me a bit to get used to some of the minor differences with this bike and get a feel for it but I really like it. It's pretty old so it has a very vintage feel to it. I told the mechanic not to bother with the windshield and he said well at least take it with you. Then I saw it and thought that's not very invasive and decided to give it a try.
I've never ridden a motorcycle with a faring or windshield. As I suspected, it's much smoother at higher speeds on the freeway. On my old bike as soon as you go over 100 K you're wrestling with the wind and the bike is all over the road.
This bike is very smooth. Going from 100 K to 120 K is not noticeable. On my other bikes it sure was. It doesn't sound as big and bad as my Boulevard with custom Cobra pipes but that's OK. This one is for road trips. It kinda sounds like a vespa or a sewing machine but it's not an invasive sound like a 2 stroke.
You have to be double jointed to put the kickstand up when you're sitting on the bike but I'm getting used to that. Overall I really like it. I think the windscreen is perfect. My head is above it so I still get the wind on my face but it's very smooth on the freeway. As I get older that's kind of nice.
I'm getting readjusted to shifting with my toe again. I got really comfortable with the heel shifter on my previous bike. When I rode to work in the morning yesterday it was a bit cool on my face and legs. I use an open face helmet and when it's dark out I wear clear safety glasses instead of sunglasses.
When it's raining or really cold out, I have a snap on face shield I use. Rain on your face after 80 K is irritating. The face shield is comfortable for the rain or cold. Today I used my face shield and rain pants as a wind break and at minus one it was comfortable.
I had one troll try to trash my new bike saying it's an under powered dog that won't make it up a hill let alone mountain. I'm wondering if that guy was on crack or just an idiot. All the reviews on this bike are awesome. It's a great bike for going on long rides because it is reliable.
Triumph is a reputable brand. They didn't try and copy Harley and make a V twin, they stuck with their own side by side design and it has proven to be very reliable. I've seen guys on the ferry to the Sunshine coast on Triumph Rockets. It's the side by side twin times three. Six cylinders in total for a weight to power ratio that's staggering. I don't need that much power.
I don't need 114 cubic inches. That's 1868 cc. 865 cc is fine for me. It's cheaper on gas and cheaper on insurance. If you're going on a long road trip being cheaper on gas is a good thing.
This bike has an old school manual choke like a lawn mower. It works great. It starts in the cold no problem. This bike has a chain. For most people that's common. Chain or belt drive but all my motorcycles have been shaft drive. That's how I could ride in the snow. I lace rope on the tires like chains. When you drive or dry pavement the rope starts to come off. With a shaft drive that's no problem. With a chain, that's a big problem.
Parts of the rope as they come flying off could get stuck in the chain and damage the motorcycle. So I'm not going to ride in the snow on this bike. Been there, done that. This bike has a really nice paint job and I don't want to scratch it.
Since it is my first experience with a chain on a motorcycle I asked the mechanic what kind of maintenance does it require. He asked if I ride in the rain and I was like yeah. That means you have to clean it more often since the water and dirt spraying up from the road will get in the chain.
He said you just get a motorcycle jack and lift the rear tire a few inches off the ground so it spins. Then you use a cleaner spray to clean it. Then when it's try you use a different spray to lubricate it. I asked about WD40 and he said the proper ones are better so I bought one of each from him. Just like your guns. You have to clean them and lubricate them.
Update: Day three my motorcycle wouldn't start. I was somewhat discouraged. It wouldn't even turn over and for some reason I couldn't push start it. I called the mechanic and he said it sounded like the solenoid and I wondered if I could bypass the solenoid to get the bike started so I could ride it in to get the solenoid replaced. Sure could. Once you know how to do it, it's easy.
🚨The Court of Appeal has dismissed the appeal of Justice Mosley’s decision, confirming once again that invoking the Emergencies Act was unconstitutional.
That is a really big deal and the Court of Appeal was unequivocal:
When we look back on the largest peaceful protest in Canadian history, we need to remember how the media misrepresented it. Locals with cell phones showed how the CBC would report on it with their back to the crowd to misrepresent the number of people in attendance. The Cloverdale border crossing in support of the Convoy was very well attended.
We remember watching police on horses trample a peaceful elderly woman who was disabled. That was disgusting. It stained all of us. If the trucks were illegally parked they could have started towing them without an emergency order. Instead they used the emergency order to physically beat peaceful protesters. That was a dark day in Canadian history.
We need to remember how Justin Trudeau responded to the protesters in Ottawa and how Netanyahu has completely ignored the ongoing mass protests and general strike in Israel. These are the same people that want to "liberate" Iran. Not. It's a double standard. They support MEK who are terrorists.
While we're here let's talk about two more arguments refuting the false charges against the Dirty News blog. The trolls keep trying to defame him because they're on the PoPo's payroll. Blaze said I shouldn't keep talking about him because it will damage my credibility. Like I ever gave a f*ck about that.
The mainstream media has no credibility. A friend of the world is an enemy to God. Not that I care about that but a friend of the world is an enemy to the truth. If the world speaks highly of you, that's a bad sign. They give themselves awards for lying.
The CBC claimed that they messaged 6ademiks on a fake X account impersonating him after he made a post about Ryan Wedding paying his TP well and claimed he said this and that about Ryan Wedding in the messages. First of all, that wasn't him. I subscribe to his X. That post was never on it.
The CBC claim the fake account they saw it on has since been deleted but they provided a screen shot. His real X account has not been deleted. It's still there for the world to see along with his back up X account. Was that fake account the government of India like the other one or was it the FBI? You tell me. It doesn't matter because it wasn't him and people are going out of their way to set him up. Why? Why would they do that?
To eliminate independent media. We all see how they try to control the media and cancel anyone who posts anything contrary to their narrative. They tried the same thing to me.
So let's look at the two new arguments. Recently I posted a picture of Lil Man after he was shot dead before they burned the house down. At first I thought it was AI but then a not really independent YouTuber quoted Post Media News who claim the CFSEU told them it was real. Are they going to arrest me for posting it? The picture I posted has the photo credit embedded in the picture. That's where whoever sent it to me got it from.
Who sent it to them? Who knows? It could have been anyone. It was passed around on social media. What if it was a FBI agent pretending to be an associate of Ryan Wedding?
What if it was a picture of a police informant that was killed? Would the FBI arrest me for posting a picture of a murdered police informant? Is it unlawful to do so? No it is not.
So all these false claims about 6ademiks aren't unlawful, they just build a defamation campaign against him in the eyes of the public. The FBI claim the Dirty News Blogger was paid by Ryan Wedding to post a picture of a police informant they killed.
First of all, he never did that. It was never posted on his website which they seized under false pretense and it was never posted on his X account. Only on fake social media accounts impersonating him.
So he didn't do it but even if he had, that's not against the law. If I, 6ademiks or anyone else post a picture of a dead police informant that is not against the law.
It's not just cause to extradite him and send him to a US Guantanamo bay. There is no evidence of unlawful activity on the table worthy of his extradition. The only other claim is that Ryan Wedding paid him not to write about him.
First of all, that's not true. He did write about Ryan Wedding. I saw it. Only unlike me, 6ademiks didn't claim the charges against Ryan Wedding were fake, he said they were real. He simply quoted mainstream media outlets that said Ryan Wedding was a large scale drug dealer.
So first all all, the FBI lied when they said Ryan Wedding paid the Dirty News not to write about him. That accusation is false because he had written about him. I saw it. However, even if their false claim was true, which it is not, that isn't unlawful.
Say for example the Hells Angels paid me to stop writing about them and I did. That's not unlawful. That's not a crime. So not only is the FBI allegation against the Dirty News blogger false, they aren't accusing him of committing a crime. That means according to the FBI's own indictment, there is no evidence of 6ademiks having committed any crime. They have not met the requirements of extradition. That means the extradition has no lawful reason to proceed. Free 6ademiks.
Let's talk about BIBO's war with the Brother's Keepers and how that proves the fake news is lying again. Remember BIBO's rap beef with BK? It was more than a rap beef. It was a real beef that was killed by another betrayal.
What was BIBO? BIBO was a faction within the Red Scorpions that was run by Gary Kang. It stood for Blood, in Blood out. Implying that you had to kill to get in and be killed to get out which is a separate dilemma all on it's own.
The Red Scorpions are a puppet club that sell drugs for the Hells Angels. The Wolf Pack actually. Larry Amero and Damion Ryan. Before the Surrey Six murder they worked for the UN when the UN was at it's peak. After the Surrey Six, the Red Scorpions started working for the Hells Angels.
Jamie Bacon tried to tax Corey Lal for Larry Amero because Jamie's brother Jonathan Bacon was best friends with Larry Amero. They knew each other since High school.
Jamie Bacon hid behind Jonathon's friendship with Gumby so Spike wouldn't tax him. After Jonathon was killed Jamie Bacon was tired of being a HA b*tch. Gary Kang led a faction within RS that was trying to break free of the Hells Angels control and ownership of RS. Jamie Bacon supported Gary Kang while he paid the HA tax. The Brother's Keepers are a Hells Angels puppet club run by the Edmonton Angels.
There was a war between Gary Kang's BIBO and the Brother's Keepers because the Brother's Keepers were trying to prevent BIBO from breaking off of HA control. Shrek was BK and Shrek was a Jamie Bacon associate. It wasn't a BK RS beef it was a BK BIBO beef. The Hells Angels put Jamie Bacon in charge of the RS and hired the Brother's Keepers to kill anyone from BIBO. Then Jamie Bacon went into Witness Protection.
Jamie Bacon made an audio trying to recruit Mathew Johnston into joining him in the Program because he needed a body guard again. Jamie lied and said the bikers were stealing from him. In reality, if it wasn't for the bikers, Jamie Bacon wouldn't be in charge of the Red Scorpions and wouldn't be making any money. Jamie Bacon lied to justify ratting out the Hells Angels.
Kyle Latimer and Lol Lanski cut a deal with the HAs. They betrayed BIBO and helped with some prison beatings to secure their leadership within the Red Scorpions after Jamie Bacon went into Witness Protection. After that, BIBO was dead in the water. BIBO did not kill Lil Man. His own crew did.
The fake news is repeating the false claims from the CFSEU predicting retaliation from rivals for Lil Man's murder. They fabricated a ridiculous fantasy about a hired hit man from outside. Lil man was killed by someone he knew. Someone he trusted. These are the same lies they tried to spread when Gary Kang was murdered. They claimed Aness Mohamed was killed by the UN in retaliation for Gary Kang. They lied. The Wolf Pack killed them both. They tried to make it look like it was a rival when it was really them.
Just like how they created RK after the Wolf Pack was given the DTES. Redd Alert was a First Nations gang that sold drugs for the Edmonton Angels. They took back all the drug dealers in the DTES from the UN for the HAs. Then the powers that be gave the DTES to the Wolf Pack and gave Surrey to the Edmonton Angels. So they killed Glen Nelson's wife to force him to comply.
Then they created RK, the Redd Alert Killas to make it look like the UN was going after the Redd Alert when it was really them. The Wolf Pack supplied RK. These lies are tied to the CFSEU. The same people who released Lil man after telling the media he was Canada's most wanted fugitive. That was shady.
Speaking of fake news, this is off the hook. Lisa Banfield, Gabe Wortman's fake common law swinger spouse just gave CTV an exclusive interview about what she claims happened the night of the mass shooting in Nova Scotia. She's lying through her teeth.
Gabe Wortman was a police agent and so was she. She was his fake common law spouse in that cross border drug and guns operation. They were in an open relationship. He was having threesomes with the neighbor and several young girls. He was not a controlling ex. That is a bold faced lie.
I can't believe the fake news is still gas lighting us over this. She spent Christmas with her family while Gabe stayed home having threesomes with the neighbors. If he really was her common law spouse, she would have brought him to be with her family at Christmas. She is lying with impunity and the fake news is eating it up. She was paid by the New Brunswick RCMP just like Gabe was because they were both police agents.
.png)