Pierre Poilievre: Property Rights and Genocide

I want to talk about two different positions that Pierre Poilievre has. One I agree with, the other I do not. Yet they are both very important policies. So I really agree with him on one and really disagree with him on the other and I shall explain why.

Pierre Poilievre held a town hall in Vancouver last Saturday about property rights and the Cowichan ruling. It was right before Monday's vote on the Conservative motion to protect property rights by law. 

The fake news lied and called the property rights concern rhetoric. So once again the mainstream media is straight up lying to us bombarding us with propaganda tied to the UN's New World Order.

Doesn't involve property rights. Tell that to the property owners in Richmond that can't renew their mortgages because of the insane court decision. 

Just to recap, one of the many absurdities in the conflicted Cowichan decision is the simple fact that they aren't from Richmond, the Musqueam nation are.

The Cowichan tribe was from Vancouver Island and are named after the Cowichan valley there. So the insane Cowichan claim was yet another overlapping land claim where more than one tribe claimed ownership of the same land. That's why the Musqueam nation opposed the Cowichan decision. 

As for the claim that the application didn't involve property rights, that is an offensive lie. That's exactly what it involved. After the public push back from the insane decision the sleazebag lawyers for the Cowichan land claim stated we don't want the land, we just want the government to pay us current market value for the land. They wanted more money. 

This is Stormy Daniels times a thousand. Once you agree on an out of court settlement, that settlement is final. You can't keep coming back over and over again asking for more more more but that is exactly what's happening and the concept of property rights has now been turned upside down. Ironically enough, Communism also opposes property rights. So we can all see who is ultimately behind all this chaos. 

Pierre Poilievre holds a town hall on property rights in response to the conflicted Cowichan land grab and I totally agree with him on that very important issue. 

The Conservatives put forward a bill protecting property rights by law and the Liberals voted it down. The question we need to ask is why on earth did the Liberals vote that bill down? Why?

If the Liberals oppose property rights then they support this drive to turn Canada upside down and remove property rights altogether. That's not a very big tent. That's pretty extreme.

If the public outrage over the property rights put at risk by the overlapping Cowichan land claim is just rhetoric and those concerns are false, then why not put that in writing and protect those property rights by law. The fact that they didn't is evidence that they're lying. 

So that's one very important issue I totally agree with Pierre Poilievre on and totally disagree with Mark Carney on. Yet there is another equally important issue that I totally disagree with Pierre Poilievre on.

Charlie Kirk questioned the Gaza genocide and passionately opposed the Iran war. Pierre Poilievre can't pimp Charlie Kirk's murder and at the same time passionately support Trump's unproved war with Iran. That's as sleazy as Ben Shapiro.

I've already mentioned how Trump 2.0 flipped the elections in Canada and Australia. We were both fed up with all the left wing extremism being crammed down our throats we were both set to elect Conservative governments. Until Trump 2.0 went bat sh*t crazy and opposed all of Charlie Kirk's important policies.

Tariffs are Taxes. Tariffs became the WEF's new carbon tax on steroids. People in Canada and Australia saw Trump instantly swing the pendulum to the opposite extreme and they said nope and elected Liberal governments. 

Notwithstanding that obvioius cause and effect, Pierre Poilievre has refused to distance himself from Trump 2.0's Neo Con extremism. So has Aaron Gunn. 

Aaron Gunn had the audacity to blame Mark Carney for the recent record breaking spike in the price of gas which was the direct result of trump's unprovoked war with Iran in support of the WEF's globalist agenda. 

What makes matter worse is Pierre Poilievre's defiant support for Trump's mentally ill threats against Iran and unwavering support for Israel invasion of Lebanon. Margaret Thatcher he's not. He's a Neo Con like Harper and Ly'n Brian Mulroney. 

Using lies to rationalize atrocities is astounding. We are not men. We are DEVO. Harper would have gone into Iraq with Bush which was based on a lie. The fact that Chretien didn't was a very good thing. Chretien did have many other flaws but that wasn't one of them. That was some thing he did right.

If Pierre Poilievre was elected, he'd be supporting this insanity in Iran and Lebanon which has sent us base jumping into the New World Order. Keep in mind, Stephen Harper used to frequently speak at the World Economic Forum. That's because he was a neo con like Brian Mulroney. He was not a Conservative and Pierre Poilievre is following right in those same footsteps. 

So that concerns me. This unprovoked invasion of Lebanon is based on a lie. A false prophesy some whack job pulled out of his a*s and started reading to his children so people wouldn't believe the true prophecies.  

The unprovoked war with Iran is tied directly to the unprovoked invasion of Lebanon which Pierre Poilievre supports. That is why I can never vote for Pierre Poilievre despite his position on property rights. The Federal Conservatives need a new leader and Aaron Gunn is not it. As the political pendulum swings from one extreme to the other the only peace is found when we balance those extremes and find equilibrium.