Well today is world water day and IDGAF. The reason I know is because all week at work they have been pushing us to fill out an online survey about water rights. At first I thought it sounded innocent enough. Then a coworker made a sarcastic comment about water rights and gender equality.
I chuckled at the absurdity until they pointed to that exact wording in the posters scattered all over the lunch room. It went off on a huge tangent about how water rights and gender rights are tied together and we were all like WTF?
I asked a manager to explain it to me and their explanation was straight out of the Twilight Zone. Today a safety rep asked me if I had filled out the survey and I said no. They then asked do I want to and I said no. That was the end of the conversation.
Thankfully my employer makes participation in UN propaganda optional. That's normally something I'd expect to see coming from a union rep. I'm not saying water awareness is a bad thing and I'm certainly not opposed to gender equality.
I am concerned with where the UN is trying to take us with these innocent sounding ideas. The UN has a very dark agenda which is anything but innocent. So let's talk about that.
One younger coworker said in the survey they were asked ways in which they planned to save water. Now of course that question is innocent enough but is it really?
I live in Vancouver. The guide going up the gondola on Grouse mountain once called this a rain forest. I laughed and said rain forests are warm. The point is it rains a lot in the Pacific Northwest. We have dry patches in the summer and lawn watering restrictions are in place but right now we just went through another atmospheric river with over a week of heavy rain. There is no shortage of water here.
Supporters of the survey keep saying this is world water day and reference Africa where women have to carry water long distances. Obviously if the men aren't out hunting and fishing then they should share that burden. When asked for suggestions one supporter of the survey said move closer to water. Profoundly simple. Funding clean wells is also a worthy project. Back to here and the UN's agenda.
When asked what they planned to do to reduce water consumption the young coworker said take shorter showers. Easy enough but hold the door. Water is a renewable resource.
If I drink a glass of water, I urinate in the toilet and it goes to the ocean. If I wash my motorcycle or flush the toilet, that water goes to the ocean. It then evaporates and returns as rain. It's a great gig. The US wants to buy water from us? Sure. We sell it to them, it goes into the ocean and comes back as rain. Money in the bank. We've seen some pretty ridiculous things done in the name of water conservation.
They intentionally shut off the water during the Maui fire because water is sacred. They ran out of water in the LA fire because they were diverting the water for an absolutely insane reason. Some fake environmentalist said we need to divert the water to save the smelts. Small fish that live in shallow water of the ocean on the coast. They said if we don't divert the water the smelts will die. That was ridiculous. The ocean is huge.
Whether the ocean levels rise from global warming melting ice or recedes from diverted water, the smelts will always live in the shallow water on the coast. The fake environmentalism was another lie to justify holding back water in a giant fire. It never really gets diverted because if you use it in a fire or for the City's drinking water, it still ends up in the ocean in the water cycle.
The UN is conditioning us to ration water in times of fire so they can burn our forests and many of our cities to the ground. We already see that in BC's new and not so improved forest fire mismanagement. Instead of attacking the forest fire with water bombers they use helicopters with a tiny bucket and a guy with a shovel. That is a huge conspiracy everyone can see.
It goes hand in hand with saving electricity. They keep conditioning us to save electricity. My hydro bill is two tier. My flat rate in one tier and if I use more than that they charge me more per unit of electricity as a penalty.
Put that in perspective. Right now there are a lot of electric vehicles on the road. Yet that is a small percentage over all. They are trying to force us all into electric vehicles through the net zero fraud. This will put a huge burden on the power grid.
Next they will want us to save electricity by limiting our travel in those electric cars which is a direct violation of the mobility rights entrenched in the Charter of Rights. As Michael Moore pointed out in his documentary Planet of the Humans, using electric cars where the electricity is generated by industrial coal is not green. At all. It's a scam.
Nuclear power is not green either. Hydroelectric power is yet the WEF keep trashing hydroelectric power despite it's positive effect on the environmental. That's because they don't care about the environment. They care about their agenda and use fake environmentalism as an excuse to implement it.
Russia had a natural gas pipeline to Germany. That was awesome. Getting Germany off industrial coal will be a huge improvement in air quality and a huge reduction in world CO2 emissions. Twinning the Nord Stream pipeline was in everyone's best interest. Trump said he didn't want Germany to become too dependent on Russian natural gas. He wanted to sell them American coal instead. That was one giant leap backwards.
So what did Joe Biden the fake environmentalist do? He blew up the pipeline and created an energy crisis in Europe. These people don't care about the environment. They use these pretentious slogans to distract us. Banning natural gas has nothing to do with protecting the environment. We can all see that. Yet the UN's Agenda 2030 and the UN's New World Order still strives to con us into being slaves with good intentions.
