Some people are saying we'll never know the truth about the Charlie Kirk assassination but that is simply not true. We already know. We've seen the ballistic evidence from a 30-06. We know Charlie Kirk was not shot with a 30-06. We know that. We also know the FBI is lying. That much we do know.
The claim that there are no Epstein files is also a lie. Kash Patel and Tulsi Gabard are no better than the others. They are the same. Nothing has changed. Donald Trump has not drained the swamp he has become the swamp. That much we know.
We also know that Charlie Kirk was not shot from the front because there was no exit wound. The claim that he was shot in the front by a 30-06 and his man of steel neck stopped the bullet is a ridiculous lie. We all know that. There's no question about it.
This video shows what really happened. It is the only theory that makes sense and is consistent with the known facts. None of the other theories are based on facts and ballistic evidence. He wasn't shot from the front and he was not shot by a 30-06.
There was another video put out from other angle trying to debunk that obvious fact. It failed to do so. In the real video the guy claimed a shadow was blood splatter from an entry wound. Turns out that wasn't blood splatter that was an ear piece. That doesn't disprove the theory at all.
The shirt pillowed in the rear as a result of being shot in the back of the neck because of the wire attached to his ear piece. As the real video pointed out, the way Charlie's neck buckled on impact was similar to how game reaches when they are shot in the neck and their spinal cord is severed.
That means this was definitely a professional shot. They severed his spinal cord from the only possible angle that wouldn't hit other bystanders. Remember that scene from the movie Gladiator where Maximus asks for a soldier's death?
He's kneeling, bends his head down and the other soldier was going to sever his spinal cord from the base of the neck. That is exactly what happened in this shot. That alone is further evidence it was a professional hit from an intelligence agency.
It was obviously a smaller caliber than a 30-06 from the impact and sound. People are assuming it was a 5.56 which is possible. It could also have been a .22 win mag since the Agency loves using .22 head shots.
One time I was at the gun range and a guy beside me was shooting a scoped rifle at a very distant target. Only every time he fired it, it barely made a sound. I kept looking over at it wonder what is that? Is that a pellet gun? It barely made a sound. Then I looked at his casings and saw it was a .22.
Severing a spinal cord from a close range with a .22 is a very skilled shot with malicious intent. That was an Intelligence Agency. We all know that. We don't have to wait for a fake commission's report. We know that now.
Update: This video has NOT been debunked. In the initial video Range Bro suggested that a shadow was blood splatter from an entrance wound. As Valhalla VFT pointed out, a new video from a different angle shows that wasn't blood it was an ear piece.
As VFT said, that doesn't change anything. It simply confirms that he was not shot from the front because there was no exit wound or blood splatter behind him. The shirt pillowed in the front and the back from the shock wave. In the back it was also because of the wire attacked to his ear piece.
Everyone thinks there will be blood splatter from an entrance wound on the chest because of the Hollywood squibs we see on TV. The small packages that explode to simulate a gun shot. That's the movies not real life. In the back of the spine one would not expect to see a lot of blood splatter on entrance.
What we would expect to see is blood splatter from an exit wound after being shot in the neck with a 30-06 which we didn't see. That means he wasn't shot from the front and he wasn't shot with a 30-06. Disinformation trolls are actively trying to suppress the truth. We need to recognize that.
On the chest or abdomen, we expect to see blood from an entrance wound after the bullet has penetrated the body and it bleeds out. Yet even there, the initial momentum is moving forward. The blood splatter is from the exit wound. At the back of the spine, there's less blood and once again all the momentum is moving forward. Blood splatter from an entrance would would be the opposite direction from all that initial momentum.
There's another video from yet another angle which completely confirms that Charlie Kirk was shot from behind, top right. That video isn't blurred stills and is gory so I won't post it. The point is the truth is obvious for everyone to see. He was not shot with a 30-06 and he was not shot from the front. He was shot from a different angle with a smaller caliber bullet.
.png)
.jpeg)
