Hiring MacMillan Bloedel to fight forest fires

I made a post about fighting forest fires talking about the problem of preignitions and using helicopters instead of water bombers. Water bombers are more bang for the buck and preignitions are problematic for obvious reasons. Let's give them the benefit of the doubt. Let's pretend they aren't intentionally trying to burn the province to the ground and are simply stupid. So let's talk about a simple solution that wouldn't cost a penny.

The theory behind pre ignitions is to make it so that the forest fire runs out of fuel and goes out on it's own. It's a good idea. The obvious problem is if the fire is moving south it is because the wind it blowing south. If the wind is blowing south and you set a new fire south of the existing fire the southernly wind isn't going to cause the new fire to move north towards the existing fire.

If the wind is blowing south and you light a new fire south of the existing fire, the new fire is just going to make it worse which is exactly what we saw last summer in Kelowna. This is why everyone thinks they are trying to burn the province down on purpose. They are making a collective set of bad decisions. Not allowing volunteers to help is another.

I have a very simple and cost effective solution that I've mentioned before but I forgot to mention in my last post so I'm going to say it again loud and proud. Let's take the preignition theory and improve it. Let's hire MacMillan Bloedel or whatever they're called now.

If we have a forest fire let's call up a tree harvesting company like MacMillan Bloedel. We tell them alright guys, we have a forest fire every man on deck. We will give you a temporary permit to clear cut a narrow strip of trees in whatever direction the fire is heading. That way when the fire gets to the clear cut it will run out of fuel and we haven't started a new fire and made it worse.

This is a win win situation because it would work and it wouldn't cost us a penny. We just tell them, we're not going to pay you but you get to keep all the profits from the trees you harvest. That way they would make a profit from fighting forest fires safely and effectively.

We need to start doing this. It is a very simple and cost effective solution. It would be easy. Just send in a couple of those tree harvesting machines and it's done instantly. We also need to bring back tree planting. Narrow clear cuts instead of preignitions would create far less CO2 emissions.

Speaking of tree planting. Remember we used to have that forestry place in Green Timbers that would create seedlings for tree planting? They got rid of it and put in the RCMP HQ. We need to bring back forestry centres preparing seedlings to plant and replenish the forests after fires.

Squamish forest fire Climatizes us for negligence

Yahoo News is reporting that "Residents of Squamish, B.C., say they’re on edge as a wildfire burns on a forested ridge above the community. Those in the community have been watching helicopter water bombers make repeated trips over the fire as gusty winds carry the smell of smoke back into the district."

Repeat trips. Look at that tiny bucket. That's like trying to put out a house fire with a watering can for plants. We've seen a lot of criminally negligent forest fire fighting over the years. LA, Maui, Chile even here in Canada. Back burns in windy conditions that make the fire much worse. Oh this is all part of the science. No it's not. It's all part of an agenda to climatize us for insanity. 

In 2023 a 40 year first fire fighting veteran said BC Wildfire Service has lost its way. Indeed they have. We need more air support. Water bombers not those tiny little buckets. The experts say helicopters are more accurate. Those aren't experts. The more water the more effective it is. It's that simple. 

This isn't a climate change debate. This is a forest fire management debate. In order for us to adjust to climate change we need to be more effective at forest fire management. Fighting a forest fire with a shovel and a bucket is not effective. We need more air support. We need better air support.

Float planes are more effective than helicopters and are more cost effective as well. CTV is reporting that "Canada can fight fires faster and cheaper with the nimble Fire Boss aircraft."

This isn't new. This is what we used to do for decades in BC. Back in the day, when someone got their pilots licence, they needed hours of experience to get their commercial licence. Many would fight fires on small float planes in BC to get those hours. Float planes can also be used throughout the year for tourist charters. We need to embrace the Costco business model. Costco is always innovating. If they try something that doesn't work they go back to the most efficient way of doing it. 

Highly Suspicious Fire in Hawaii

Update: Rebel News is sending a team in to investigate the matter

Strange statements made about the Hawaii fire

OK let's back this up a bit. I just got back from a road trip yesterday and people were sending me all kinds of links to the fire in Hawaii. So let's calmly and rationally have a look. Obviously the fire was real. High winds during a fire is very dangerous. Reuters is reporting that "Nearly 85% of U.S. wildfires are caused by humans, according to the U.S. Forest Service. Natural causes include lightning and volcanic activity. In Hawaii, less than 1% of fires are due to natural causes, according to Elizabeth Pickett, co-executive director of the Hawaii Wildfire Management Organization. The Hawaiian Islands have six active volcanoes, including one on Maui."

Obviously the fire was real as were the high winds that fanned the flames so to speak. In BC we are very familiar with the annual risk of forest fires. We have a lot of forests here filled with evergreen trees like cedar, fir, pine and hemlock. Anyone who has been camping knows. if you put once of those green branches on a campfire, it will instantly ignite and burst into flames.

That's why every summer we are under high risk for forest fires. This year hasn't been abnormally bad for us. We've had much worse yet this year Alberta and Nova Scotia have had some large forest fires. Whether it's arson or human negligence it's hard to tell. During the ANTIFA riots in the US we all saw video footage of arsonists in California.

Deliberately starting a forest fire is criminally insane. Pretty much every summer now we have campfire bans yet we still manage to have forest fires. Most campfire are pretty contained. Sadly, throwing a cigarette buy out of the window of a moving car can easily ignite dry grass and start a fire. Something so simple and so easily avoidable.

In Hawaii they have palm trees which are awesome. However, they're not all bunched in together don't have highly flammable branches reaching out next to each other. We don't know the cause of the fire in Hawaii yet but from the pictures we see a whole neighborhood burned to the ground.

It kind of looks similar to the Lytton fire. To my understanding that was caused by brakes on a train that ran right through the town. I filmed Lytton on my road trip to the Bowron Lakes.

In BC we have a lot of wood framed houses close together. If a fire breaks out and is not quickly contained it can easily spread to other houses. That's kind of what it looks like happened in Hawaii. It's going to take some time to sift through the data and process it. I'm still basking in the splendor of my road trip and will make two new posts. One discussing wind therapy, the about balancing the extremes as my mandate evolves.

Sky News posted some pictures of the fire. When you take a look at the leaves on the palm trees in this picture, that would imply the gale winds were blowing towards the ocean now inland. That would explain why the whole island didn't burn to the ground. It would also help us pinpoint the start of the fire. This video on Newsweek shows the geographical location of the area that burned. The shape of the mountains around it matches the shape of the image of the fire burning.

This picture from Metro UK is suspicious. I'm not doubting the validity of the picture. I'm questioning why the fire had sporadic hot spots separated from each other. Forest fires can jump a river if the winds are strong enough but this fire jumped complete neighborhoods. That might imply more than one starting point which would also imply arson.

Forest fires and melting snow

Update: Hiring MacMillan Bloedel to fight forest fires

Today I checked it the snow pack on Cypress. We have a week of sunshine in the forecast and the snow pack is melting fast but that's pretty normal for this time of year. We had an El Niño last winter and will have a La Niña next winter. So the sky hasn't fallen and the El Niño / La Niña cycle has nothing to do with climate change. The sensationalized fake news was going on about how the low snow pack will cause more forest fires this summer. I don't notice an abnormally low snow pack right now. If it melts a week before it did last year that will be insignificant.

What is very significant is the negligent way we start and fight forest fires now in BC. Instead of using water bombers that fill in nearby lakes, we use helicopters with buckets because some pencil neck geek found a way for them to make more money while being far less efficient. That's kind of like the fireman who starts fires to give himself a job. Oh wait, they do that now too.

While we're here, lets calmly and rationally talk about the obvious dangers of preignitions. Let's discuss the theory behind them and why that is so obviously problematic. Say we have a forest fire burning. The wind is blowing south so the fire is moving south. In that situation we want to light a pre ignition south of the fire so when the fire gets there it will run out of fuel. That sounds good but it is inherently problematic for obvious reasons.

The fire is moving south because the wind is blowing south. If you light a fire south of the existing fire why on earth would you expect the fire you start to move north towards the fire when the wind is blowing south? It won't. The existing fire will run out of fuel but you just started a new fire so you accomplished nothing. You simple made it worse which is exactly what we saw in Kelowna last year. They lit fires trying to stop the fire but they simply made it worse much worse.

So we are now forced to question whether or not it was their intent to make the fire worse since we are on a new campaign of lighting forest fires and have stopped fighting them with water bombers. We expect a guy with a shovel will somehow do a better job than a water bomber. That's ridiculous. It's a scam. They are intentionally destroying our province. So now we have to ask why? Kelowna is a conservative riding. Did the NDP intentionally try to burn them out?

What about Lytton? Kelowna is on a lake. There is no reason that fire should have got that close to the town. They can fill water bombers up on the lake but they refuse to do so. That is a criminal act. Just like starting new fires is. The Maui fire was suspicious from the get go but as more abnormalities began to surface that was clearly a criminal act. They shut the water off so residents couldn't keep fighting the fire. They prevented people from evacuating and rerouted them back into the fire where they died waiting in line stuck in traffic.

And then there was Chile and the pattern has been revealed. What happened to tree planting?

Is Nova Scotia's ban on hiking Donald Trumps fault?

This news about Nova Scotia banning people from hiking, camping or fishing in the forest is big news. As I said in my recent podcast about life after 60, we always knew the world was crazy but until Covid and Trump 2.0 we had no idea how craxy it could get and how far the government would go to suppress our rights and freedoms. We had no idea.

During Covid they started coming up with insane rules that made no sense. They banned people from hiking on the local mountains. Getting fresh air and exercise is a good thing. Locking everyone down is not. It's unhealthy.

Likewise banning people from hiking in the forest because of a high forest fire risk is straight out of George Orwell. It is criminally insane and a defiant violation of the mobility rights in the Charter of Rights. It would appear that after Covid gave them an excuse to ban mobility rights, now they are hard at work thinking up new ridiculous reasons to violate our mobility rights but that's not all.

There are two aspects of how crazy this is. First is the actual act of banning hiking in the forest. The second is the extreme nature of the fine. $25,000.00 is bat sh*t crazy and grossly disproportionate compared to other offenses. 

Recently I complained about getting a $100 ticket for crossing a yellow island to get into the left turn lane because the lane that was gong straight was backed up but the turning lane was empty. I pointed out that they smoke crystal meth right around the corner. Fining me for this and doing nothing about that was unequal protection of the law. It makes taxpayers angry. 

Drug related violence is a big deal. Hiking is not. A $100.00 ticket for hiking would be unacceptable. A $25,000.00 ticket is criminally insane. You get less that that for drunk driving or going twice the speed limit which is a lot worse. Turns out it was $28,000.00 if you include tax and a victim surcharge. What victim? This is staking up crazy on top of crazy. 

Before I get into the cause, I just want to emphasize how outrageous this fine really is. Some people claim it's because Canadians won't do anything about it. I beg to differ. Violent protests are never the answer. That's what they want. They want violent protests so they can send in their ICE Barbies to stop the protests. The reason why the government of Nova Scotia has lost their mind and overextended their boundaries is because they elected a liberal government federally but this is provincial.

Provincially they elected the Progressive Conservative Party so WTF? This is Jason Kenny Déjà vu. People want Alberta to separate from Canada because Nova Scotia is banning hiking but the guy who banned it is a Conservative!!! This is what I'm trying to tell you. There are globalists on the left AND the right. 

There are two things we can learn from this. First is the obvious fact that Tim Houston is a fake Conservative just like his buddy Dough Ford who is bffs with Chrystia the WEF Freak Freeland. Alberta wants to separate because they want more freedom but they put Stephen Harper in charge of their pension. Take a look at how many times Stephen Harper spoke at the World Economic Forum and give your head a shake. 

The second thing we can learn from this is that between the Provincial election in 2024 and the federal election in 2025, Nova Scotia went from Blue to Red. That's all on Donald Trump. Donald Trump 2.0 completely changed from Donald Trump 1.0. 

Canadians don't want that kind of centralized extremism and none of us should except this kind of crazy extremism form the Conservative Premier of Nova Scotia. Blind obedience is blind.

The other obvious anomaly is arson and forest fire mismanagement. When a known arsonists get a suspended sentence and a hiker gets a 28 thousand dollar fine, you know something isn't right. The guy was caught lighting 30 fires. He's a complete mental case. When he gets away with that we are forced to ask who was he working for?

People laugh and claim conspiracy theorists think the government is setting fires. Well someone sure is. This isn't the first case of chronic forest fire arson. Arsonists were caught setting forest fires in California, BC and Quebec. One arsonist can light many fires. I don't think they're working for the government. I think they're working for an intelligence agency just like Gabe Wortman and his common law spouse Lisa.

The CIA is operating in foreign countries and they support the globalism of the WEF. Pierre Poilievre refuses to recognize that. He denounces the WEF but supports Stephen Harper and the Intelligence community. That is a conflict of interest. 

As for forest fire mismanagement in Canada we all see it. The most obvious concern is getting rid of float planes and water bombers. I saw a helicopter fighting a fire in the US and it dumped a huge amount of water on the fire just like a float plane or a water bombers. We're using a helicopter with a bucket on a string. That is bat sh*t crazy. Follow the science. More water is better than less water. That's the science. 

Oh we currently have hundreds of ground crews fighting forest fires in BC. Hundreds of guys fighting hundreds of fires. Is that one guy per fire? It just rained. One water bombers is more effective than a hundred guys with a shovel. Especially when you have ground crews lighting back burns. 

When you see the obvious forest fire mismanagement, chronic arsonists getting a slap on the wrist and hikers getting insane fines, we are all forced to ask what the hell is going on here? 

It seems the reason they want to ban people from hiking in the forest during summer is so that no one seems any arsonists setting fires. All these arsonists that are getting caught is because there are witnesses. If there are no witnesses they won't get caught. Did you see Glenn Beck talk about the flame throwing robot dog? Forest Fires, Arson and Preignition.

Yet more proof that the rules do not apply equally in Canada. @JeffEvely was nailed with a $25,000 fine, plus taxes and victim surcharge, while people living in "forested tent encampments" who are presumably cooking and pose a major fire risk are left completely alone. pic.twitter.com/C2nQd9y5sV

— Dacey Media (@chrisdacey) August 18, 2025

Patagonia Wildfires and a new Israeli State or Colony

Here's another undeniably crazy headline in the Alice in Wonderland Era of Deception, Extremism and Atrocity. Three months ago the Guardian reported that "Since 5 January more than 18,000 hectares of native forests, grasslands, villages and tourist resorts have been ravaged by Patagonia’s wildfires."

These fires have been massive and like many of the other massive forest fires of late, a lot of arson is suspected. For a while people were burning down rain forests in Brazil to create agricultural land. Yet the Patagonia fires seem to have a far more sinister motive. Before we dive into the motive take a look at this Patagonia forest fire image:

What's wrong with this picture? Once again we see a criminally culpable forest fire mismanagement based on a UN gender equality water rationing lie. Fighting a massive forest fire with a garden hose and a shovel is mentally insane. There's no way around that fact and we see this same lunacy being repeated around the globe. 

In the Maui fire they cut off the water because water was sacred. Something we should worship. In the LA fires they cut off the water over a fake scheme to save ocean smelts. In BC they stopped using water bombers to fight forest fires and now use helicopters with a tiny bucket. This pattern of forest fire mismanagement is clear. 

That forces us to question the motive. Now, let's look at Argentina. The president of Argentina is Javier Milei. Not only is he bff with Netanyahu, they could be related. They have the same last name.  Recently Javier was in Israel hugging the Wailing Wall and dancing on stage like he was on crystal meth celebrating their new agreement.

"On April 19, 2026, Argentine President Javier Milei met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, signing the 'Isaac Accords' to strengthen security, AI, and diplomatic ties. Milei reaffirmed plans to move Argentina's embassy to Jerusalem and announced direct flights with El Al, highlighting a strong, alliance-based, pro-Israel stance, including support in the 2026 Iran war context."

Moving the embassy to Jerusalem just like Donald Trump's pardoned cocaine kingpin former Honduran president, Juan Orlando Hernández who was also friends with Netanyahu.

Ironically enough, just like with Juan Orlando Hernández in Honduras, Javier Milei and his team also face drug trafficking allegations. But let's set the drug trafficking aside and look at the motive behind the Patagonia wildfires...

January of this year during the Patagonia wildfires, the Jerusalem Post reported that "Argentine retired military general César Milani, alongside several key figures from the opposition, shared an antisemitic conspiracy theory on Sunday claiming two Israelis used an IDF grenade to cause a wildfire in the Patagonia region of southern Argentina."

The antisemitic conspiracy theory goes much further than that and the new Isaac Accords implies that Netanyahu is trying to colonize Argentina. We know that real estate developers wanted those homes in Maui before that devastating fire. 

Israel plans on drilling for oil in the Falklands off the coast of Argentina, just like Gaza. These are dark things going on.

January of 2026 Al Akhbar reported that "Under President Javier Milei, Argentina’s environmental and sovereignty protections have been weakened. Restrictions on foreign land ownership are being dismantled, and the Fire Management Law, designed to prevent land-use after fires, has been undermined."

"And while no statute explicitly authorizes foreigners to acquire burned land, the gradual erosion of legal safeguards makes such acquisitions easier. Moreover, the country’s capacity to prevent and contain fires has been reduced. Official projections show that the funding for Argentina’s National Fire Management Service will fall by roughly 70% by 2026, compared with recent years."

"Long before Palestine became the focus of the Zionism project, Theodor Herzl suggested Argentina as a potential destination for Jewish settlement."

PBS is reporting that "Theodor Herzl, a Hungarian-born Jew, is considered the father of political Zionism. His 1896 pamphlet, 'The Jewish State,' set forth the framework for establishing a Jewish nation." "In this essay, Herzl indicated that there were two territories being considered for the location of the Jewish state -- Palestine and Argentina. 'Shall we choose Palestine or Argentine?' asked Herzl. 'We shall take what is given us.'" Of course, this is just a crazy conspiracy theory and Theodor Herzl was an Antisemite. Argentina: The Other Promised Land

Argentina: Military support from Israel in 1982

"Newly declassified files from the National Archives in Kew reveal that Israel supplied significant weaponry including strike aircraft to the Argentine Junta in the run-up to, and during, the 1982 conflict. The files show that Israel provided, via Peru, air-to-air missiles, missile radar alert systems, and large capacity fuel tanks for the Argentine Skyhawk aircraft, giving them extra defensive capability and air time over the Falkland Islands, during the conflict." Navitas Petroleum - another Oil War.

Navitas signs off on Falkland Islands oil & gas expansion

Falklands Oil Megaproject Breaks Free After 15 Years

Report from south Lebanon pic.twitter.com/P29vGx6Xfw

— courtneybonneauimages (@cbonneauimages) April 24, 2026

Forest Fires, Arson and Preignition

Forest fire season has started early this year and that's already suspicious. Last year was Canada's worst forest fire season on record and many of those fires were set by arson.

Brian Paré is a Quebec man who plead guilty to setting 14 forest fires in 2023. That was just one guy. Last year CTV reported that "A 28-year-old woman has been arrested after a series of fires were intentionally set along the Galloping Goose Trail in Sooke, BC."

That's just two who were caught. Recently someone sent me a video of military personal using a new contraption on a jeep to set large forest firers. The video on Twitter had a warning which said that it was a planned preignition to fight a fire but when I embedded the tweet it disappeared.

We know that preignition is a new fire fighting strategy which has proven to be flawed. That's what made some of the fires in BC last year much worse. It's a bad idea. On that note, Glen Beck recently did a video showing a new home defense robot dog equipped with a flame thrower. He was laughing showing how cool it was and said it's also used in forest fire management. That's kind of a red flag. Fighting fires by setting fires is an oxymoron.

Obviously arsonists are mental cases. In urban settings a single arsonist can be responsible for setting many fires. People who set a forest on fire are even more mentally deranged. Yet we can't help but wonder if some of them are being paid to do it.

The article about the arsonist in Quebec states that he was a conspiracy theorist who claimed the government was responsible for starting fires. Yet he admitted to starting 14 himself. There's something in that narrative that doesn't make sense. If he objects to the government staring forest fires, why would he start them himself?

If he was a climate change denier, why would he set new fires to help the climate change narrative? It's like someone who thinks 911 was an inside job performing a terrorist act himself. Why would he do that? Truthers object to terrorist attacks they don't support them.

As for the disappearing video of military personnel starting forest fires, take a look at this. Last summer CBC reported that "Federal assistance including military resources are being mobilized to help British Columbia's fight against hundreds of wildfires, Canada'a Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Bill Blair announced Friday."

Take a look at what he's holding in his hand. It's not a shovel. It's "a drip torch to set a planned ignition on a wildfire burning near a highway outside Vanderhoof in northern B.C. on July 11." So we did hire the military to set fires. Last year Dan Dicks showed video footage of helicopters using tiger torches to set fries in BC from the air. That is a bad idea. We're spending money on the wrong thing. Water bombers are far more effective than helicopters.

They're also a lot more effective than a guy with a shovel or a guy with a drip torch. This relates to the Maui fraud. They shut off the water so residents couldn't fight the fire in Maui any more. These granola whack jobs claim that water is too sacred to fight fires with. STFU you lying freak.

1 helicopter bucketing, 14 firefighters respond to Cultus Lake forest fire

BC Wildfire Service has lost its way

The Chilliwack Progress is reporting that "The wildfire ignited at Cultus Lake in the early hours, which is listed as out of control, has 14 firefighters and a helicopter responding from the Coastal Fire Centre, according to the BC Wildfire Service (BCWS)." 

"Residents at the lakeside community reported seeing a water-bomber aircraft pass over the lake with low hanging smoke drifting near the water level, before the wildfire response started." Can I get a WTF brother?

We have all noticed a change in BC's forest fire mismanagement. Instead of using water bombers like we have for generations, we now use a helicopter with a bucket and a guy with a shovel. That isn't science. That isn't technological advancement. That is bat sh*t crazy and criminal culpability.

August 2023 there was a large fire in Kelowna that jumped the lake and got dangerously close to the town. It wasn't until the fire jumped the lake that they finally brought in the water bombers and quickly brought it under control. The question is why did they wait so long to bring in the water bombers?

We keep getting climate change crammed down our throat which forces us to ask, instead of throwing our hand in the air like Chicken Little, why don't we simple adapt and prepare for it?

We need to be more proactive in dealing with forest fires not less. We notice dryer summers. Whether that be from climate change or America Harp radar systems like the one Iran just blew up, we do notice drier summers.

BC has always had a forest fire problem in the summer. Pilots wanting to get their commercial pilots license needed hours so they would fly small water bomber float planes during the BC fires. A fire beside a lake makes this very effective because they can fill up on the lake. Even a fire on the coast, as we saw in LA, Canadian water bombers filled up in the ocean. It's not ideal but it works. Salt water isn't toxic. 

All this fake science is getting out of hand. We saw them cut the water off in Maui and LA. Both were for stupid reasons. It's hard not to think there's some kind of agenda or conspiracy at play when you see such obvious negligence.

Then there's the back burns that back fire.  This is too important to screw up the way we are. All that money spent on spraying the forests to prevent under growth which increases the risk of forest fires needs to be spent on water bombers. It's that simple. Rage, denial and lies will not change that. 

Shuswap Fires Intentionally Lit By Canadian Authorities

You wanna save the planet? Then save the f*cking planet. Don't burn it to the ground with your bullsh*t lies.

Forest Fires: Planned Ignition versus Planned Cuts

I just want to reiterate the obvious. We've talked about how BC's response to fighting forest fires has changed for the worse and how it is difficult to believe that these changes are simply negligence. It's hard to believe it's not intentional since they coincide with the WEF agenda.

Two examples that come to mind this summer are the Shuswap fire and the Kelowna fire. The Shuswap fire was made much worse by a planned ignition and the Kelowna fire never should have got that close to the town. It's on a lake. Water bombers can fill up right there. The NDP's negligence in that fire looked like they were simply trying to burn down a rival riding.

Two years ago the local media asked why giant water bombers were sitting idle while BC burns. Then the BC NDP responded with their ridiculous rationalization. They said we need smaller planes and helicopters that are more maneuverable. That is insane. Maneuverability has nothing to do with it. When you fight a fire the more water the better. A helicopter with a bucket is not it.

When you're fighting a fire which is better. Throwing a single bucket of water or turning on a fire hose? The fact that the BC NDP is refusing to use the large water bombers and put them up for sale is a scandal far worse than fast ferries. Using helicopters to light fires is another aspect of it.

Let's talk about planned ignition. The theory is, if you set a fire on the outskirts of a fire, by the time the original fire gets there it will be out of fuel and have nothing to burn. However, there is an inherit problem with that theory.

Let's do the math. Say we have a fire moving south. We light a fire south of that fire so it will run out of fuel when it gets to that point. Why is the fire moving south? It is because the wind is blowing south. If we light a fire south of that fire, why would that fire move north? It wouldn't. The logic is inherently flawed and they don't care because ultimately they don't want to fight fires they want to exasperate them to justify their agenda.

The fake news isn't covering the scandal because they want the drama. They want to show horrific images of destruction from fires so they can blame in on climate change and usher in the New World Oder. Climate change is no reason to throw away civil liberty and usher in the WEF's twisted brand of Communism. Neither is arson or negligence.

Let take the reasoning behind planned ignitions and apply it to a different solution. One that would be much safer and much more cost effective. Say we have a fire moving south. Instead of lighting a fire south of that fire which would probably move south, let's do a narrow clear cut south of that fire. Forest fires move fast don't ya know. Ya I know but so does machinery. Machinery cost money don't ya know. Ya I know but harvesting the trees would pay for it. Just sayn.

Smoke on the water, fire in the sky

Smoke On The Water. July was flawless. August, not so much. A few weeks ago as the sun rose over the horizon it was bright red. We now know what that means in BC. In means smoke from forest fires. For the last few weeks the summer sky has been clouded with smoke and tonight the smoke has started to descend into the city. We really need to be more proactive in dealing with these forest fires. It is becoming an annual event.

It's heartbreaking to see a forest beside a lake burn to the ground like in the above picture from Peachland. It was right beside a water source. There is no reason for this. We need to install fire hydrants and irrigation for the next generation of tree planting. One of the reason we have so many forest fires now is because of the long dry summers. This can be eased through irrigation.

Several years ago I attended the Joey Verma trial in Kelowna. I stayed at the Bear Creek campgrounds on the west shore of the lake. There was remnants of a previous forest fire. One employee said a few years ago a forest fire in West Kelowna came right up to the campsite. One crazy old man with a garden hose refused to leave and held the fire off single handedly. Installing fire hydrants and sprinklers in forests near water sources will be a step forward for everyone.

We also need a few big ass water bombers the size of a B-52. Justine Trudeau wasted all that money buying a pipeline that already existed when he could have purchased some water bombers instead to fight the fires. That shows you where his priorities are.

Large Condo Fire in Surrey

Update: The fire is pretty much out but the residents can't return home. Very sad. Looks like the adjacent building might have water damage from sprinklers. 

2nd Update: CBC has an aerial shot of the fire damage

Fire crews are on the scene of a large condo fire in Surrey on 104th Avenue between 100th Avenue and 101 Avenue. It's contained but three ladder trucks in 154th street hammered it with water to contain it. A fourth was set up on 101st Avenue in case it spread. Just like that other business fire on 104th the Surrey Fire department were very aggressive and very effective and continuing the fire before it spread. 

So once again to put out  a large fire you need to hammer it with water. You can't fight forest fires with a shovel and a sprinkling can on a helicopter. You need more water from water bombers. 

In the spirit of preparedness, it raises the concern about fighting fires in Surrey after an earthquake. We all know Metro Vancouver is over due for a large earthquake. 

Metro Vancouver is working on the problem but it's quite possible an earthquake would shut off water to Surrey. The North Shore watershed might not be accessible. 

Which means if a fire breaks out after an earthquake, all the wood framed houses are very high risk for ending up like Maui in preparation for a 15 minute city. 

Building towers out of wood like the one across from Superstore on 104th Avenue is a bad idea. Once a fire starts, if it's not quickly contained, will spread like a forest fire. 

The next morning the fire alarm was going off to discourage people from returning to their homes. One vertical block was destroyed but the rest of the complex was intact. 

Kelowna forest fire contained

Castanet is reporting that "Evacuation orders downgraded to alerts, fire held at Knox Mountain." OK Knox Mountain is right in town. Just up the street from the Kelowna Hells Angles clubhouse that was seized by the police. Having a fire that close to the city centre is indeed concerning.

Evidently there was another fire on Knox mountian five years ago. I stayed at the Bear Creek campsite on the other side of the lake once and one of the staff told me a forest fire came close to them one year and a senior citizen was out there fighting the fire with a garden hose.

A couple of weeks ago there was a fire by Bear Creek from a dirt bike. Five years ago the fire on Knox mountain was investigated as being started by arsonists. In 2003 the fire was signifigant.

World Water day and Gender rights

Well today is world water day and IDGAF. The reason I know is because all week at work they have been pushing us to fill out an online survey about water rights. At first I thought it sounded innocent enough. Then a coworker made a sarcastic comment about water rights and gender equality. 

I chuckled at the absurdity until they pointed to that exact wording in the posters scattered all over the lunch room. It went off on a huge tangent about how water rights and gender rights are tied together and we were all like WTF?

I asked a manager to explain it to me and their explanation was straight out of the Twilight Zone. Today a safety rep asked me if I had filled out the survey and I said no. They then asked do I want to and I said no. That was the end of the conversation. 

Thankfully my employer makes participation in UN propaganda optional. That's normally something I'd expect to see coming from a union rep. I'm not saying water awareness is a bad thing and I'm certainly not opposed to gender equality. 

I am concerned with where the UN is trying to take us with these innocent sounding ideas. The UN has a very dark agenda which is anything but innocent. So let's talk about that.

One younger coworker said in the survey they were asked ways in which they planned to save water. Now of course that question is innocent enough but is it really? 

I live in Vancouver. The guide going up the gondola on Grouse mountain once called this a rain forest. I laughed and said rain forests are warm. The point is it rains a lot in the Pacific Northwest. We have dry patches in the summer and lawn watering restrictions are in place but right now we just went through another atmospheric river with over a week of heavy rain. There is no shortage of water here. 

Supporters of the survey keep saying this is world water day and reference Africa where women have to carry water long distances. Obviously if the men aren't out hunting and fishing then they should share that burden. When asked for suggestions one supporter of the survey said move closer to water. Profoundly simple. Funding clean wells is also a worthy project. Back to here and the UN's agenda.

When asked what they planned to do to reduce water consumption the young coworker said take shorter showers. Easy enough but hold the door. Water is a renewable resource. 

If I drink a glass of water, I urinate in the toilet and it goes to the ocean. If I wash my motorcycle or flush the toilet, that water goes to the ocean. It then evaporates and returns as rain. It's a great gig. The US wants to buy water from us? Sure. We sell it to them, it goes into the ocean and comes back as rain. Money in the bank. We've seen some pretty ridiculous things done in the name of water conservation.

They intentionally shut off the water during the Maui fire because water is sacred. They ran out of water in the LA fire because they were diverting the water for an absolutely insane reason. Some fake environmentalist said we need to divert the water to save the smelts. Small fish that live in shallow water of the ocean on the coast. They said if we don't divert the water the smelts will die. That was ridiculous. The ocean is huge. 

Whether the ocean levels rise from global warming melting ice or recedes from diverted water, the smelts will always live in the shallow water on the coast. The fake environmentalism was another lie to justify holding back water in a giant fire. It never really gets diverted because if you use it in a fire or for the City's drinking water, it still ends up in the ocean in the water cycle. 

The UN is conditioning us to ration water in times of fire so they can burn our forests and many of our cities to the ground. We already see that in BC's new and not so improved forest fire mismanagement. Instead of attacking the forest fire with water bombers they use helicopters with a tiny bucket and a guy with a shovel. That is a huge conspiracy everyone can see. 

It goes hand in hand with saving electricity. They keep conditioning us to save electricity. My hydro bill is two tier. My flat rate in one tier and if I use more than that they charge me more per unit of electricity as a penalty. 

Put that in perspective. Right now there are a lot of electric vehicles on the road. Yet that is a small percentage over all. They are trying to force us all into electric vehicles through the net zero fraud. This will put a huge burden on the power grid. 

Next they will want us to save electricity by limiting our travel in those electric cars which is a direct violation of the mobility rights entrenched in the Charter of Rights. As Michael Moore pointed out in his documentary Planet of the Humans, using electric cars where the electricity is generated by industrial coal is not green. At all. It's a scam. 

Nuclear power is not green either. Hydroelectric power is yet the WEF keep trashing hydroelectric power despite it's positive effect on the environmental. That's because they don't care about the environment. They care about their agenda and use fake environmentalism as an excuse to implement it. 

Russia had a natural gas pipeline to Germany. That was awesome. Getting Germany off industrial coal will be a huge improvement in air quality and a huge reduction in world CO2 emissions. Twinning the Nord Stream pipeline was in everyone's best interest. Trump said he didn't want Germany to become too dependent on Russian natural gas. He wanted to sell them American coal instead. That was one giant leap backwards.

So what did Joe Biden the fake environmentalist do? He blew up the pipeline and created an energy crisis in Europe. These people don't care about the environment. They use these pretentious slogans to distract us. Banning natural gas has nothing to do with protecting the environment. We can all see that. Yet the UN's Agenda 2030 and the UN's New World Order still strives to con us into being slaves with good intentions. 

BC Wildfire Service has lost its way

Kamloops this Week is reporting that "As a lifelong resident and a professional forester in B.C. for more than three decades, with a 40-year wildfire suppression background, and previously recognized by the B.C. Wildfire Service (BCWS) as a wildfire specialist, I am angered by the present state of wildfire management in our province." Bruce Morrow op ed.

He makes several important observations and quotes the Shuswap preignition which made the fire much worse. When you look at that along with their long list of bad practices, it's hard to believe that it's simply negligence and isn't planned. Like cutting off the water supply in Hawaii during the fire or setting up police roadblocks preventing people from escaping. Something very shady is going on here and we can all see it.

Forest fires are certainly not new in BC but these new bad practices are. I have two points to make: volunteers and water bombers. In BC every community has volunteer firefighters. These are trained professionals who have regular jobs and are on call when a fire breaks out. One of my managers at work is one. He has a regular job and when a fire breaks out he takes a leave of absence to fight the fire. This is very helpful and important. It's also cost effective.

The BC's new forest fire promotion commission stopped allowing trained volunteers to assist fighting fires. They are even banning community members from protecting their own homes. That is George Orwell. They are more interested in enforcing evacuation orders than they are in fighting fires. That reveals an agenda. It's the same old problem, reaction solution paradigm.

They create a problem, wait for the reaction and then present their preplanned response to their manufactured emergency. You can fool some of the people some of the time but you can't fool all of the people all of the time. No lie can live forever.

New pilots who want to get their commercial pilot's license need to get hours in flying. Often they sign up for water bombing during forest fire season to get those hours in. This was a common process. The WEF's NDP stopped this. They have created a problem and intentionally made it worse because they have a sinister agenda just like Justin Trudeau. Stop them.

Why is an Island-based water bomber sidelined as B.C. burns?

The Net Zero 2030 Fraud at YVR

Yesterday I picked up my son from the airport and drove past a large building with a huge sign that said Net Zero 2030. They are speeding up the 2050 Agenda. 

I read it out loud and said, great. This is a huge in your face fraud of the Alice in Wonderland Era that Donald Trump's Fascism and Netanyahu's atrocities can't distract us from. Trump was supposed to deal with this but he ran off in the wrong direction and ended up expediting it. 

Net Zero 2030 is a UN catch phrase promoting their New World Order. The slogan Net Zero has absolutely nothing to do with protecting the environment. It is solely based on fake environmentalism to justify a very dark political agenda. 

As Michael Moore pointed out in his documentary Planet of the Humans, plugging electric cars into a grid that is generated by industrial coal is not green. It is defiant hypocrisy. Banning natural gas is not Green. It is defiant hypocrisy. 

We all know that pollution is bad. We get it but natural gas is clean burning. When West Vancouver converted from heating homes with coal to heating homes with natural gas, the air quality instantly improved. Industrial coal is the largest source of CO2 emissions on the planet. Event the obsession with CO2 is a misleading distraction. 

Net Zero implies zero CO2 emissions which would mean all plant life on earth dies because they need CO2 to survive. That would also mean all human and animal life dies because they need the oxygen the plants and trees produce. That is the ecosystem we live in. Plants and trees take in CO2 and give off oxygen. Humans and animals take in oxygen and give off CO2. 

So Net Zero literally means no more animal or human life which in turn would mean no more plants or trees. That's not very green. Farming is the greenest thing you can do for the planet. Banning fertilizer has nothing to do with protecting the environment. It's an attack on farming to create global food shortages to stop population growth. 

Banning water has nothing to do with protecting the environment. Water is a renewable resource. Once it's used it evaporates and returns as rain. Banning the use of large quantities of water in fighting forest fires is not protecting the environment it's killing it. Yet the primary concern revolves around natural gas and industrial coal. 

Germany phasing out their industrial coal plants with natural gas would be a colossal improvement in air quality and global CO2 emissions. Bombing the NordStream pipeline had nothing to do with protecting the environment. It was a direct attack on the environment. So this Net Zero fraud needs to be confronted.

Right now it's just as important as confronting Donald Trump's Fascism and Netanyahu's atrocities because it's far more subtle. It's a lie they keep repeating in hopes people will eventually believe it. We also need to phase out spraying the forests with glyphosate because that's bad for the environment. Net Zero 2030 really means the UN's Agenda 2030 for a New World Order. Meaning a one world Communist government. 

Another definition Net Zero is when human-caused carbon dioxide emissions are balanced by removing an equivalent amount from the atmosphere. Removed how? 

"Carbon dioxide ( CO2) is removed from the atmosphere through natural processes like photosynthesis (trees, plants, algae) and ocean absorption." No kidding. 

Reducing deforestation is another important factor. The use of glyphosate and banning the use of large quantities of water in fighting forest fires, increase deforestation. 

So do back burns and pre ignitions. By intentionally burning down the forests they are reducing the amount of CO2 consumed through photosynthesis which in turn will require more emission cuts to justify their Agenda. Here's a thought. Stop burning down the forests.

Carbon dioxide ( CO2) is also removed from the atmosphere through direct air capture. Another crazy idea to make it look like they're doing something when in reality they're not. Their fake environmentalism is just making it worse. 

Forest fires in Canada produce far more CO2 than all the cars do. So let's go back to the more effective ways of fighting forest fires with water bombers instead of buckets and shovels and stop using glyphosate. We also need to stop using back burns and pre ignitions. We have seen how that has done far more damage than good. Here's the theory. 

A forest fire starts and the wind blows it in one direction. The light a back burn or a pre ignition ahead of the fire so the fire will run out of fuel by the time it gets to the back burn. The problem with the theory is the obvious - wind.

If the wind is blowing a fire in a certain direction and you light a back burning ahead of that fire so it runs out of fuel, how on earth is the wind that's bowing the fire towards you going to blow the back burn toward the fire? It's not and we have seen countless examples of how back burns have made a bad fire much worse. So stop it. The problem is pollution not CO2. 

Save the planet by planting trees not by burning it to the ground.