Update: OK I changed the title of the post from imposes to can impose and reposted it in it's entirety and Google hasn't taken it down this time, yet. I guess Google AI is unable to identified sarcasm. However, Google censorship is very real and needs to be addressed. It started with blocking the Tienanmen square massacre in China and expanded to Covid misinformation and fake fact checkers in North America.
"Your blog readers must acknowledge the warning before being able to read the post/blog." What sensitive content you lying freaks? Please advise. Gangsters out mirror for deleted posts.
We need to pardon Tamara Lich, Chris Barber and Pat King.
Trump promises pardons for the January 6th Guantanamo Bay detainees and so he should. That punitive kangaroo court was third world. We saw the police open barricades and wave protesters in. We saw them let protesters into the building and heard one of the skeptical protesters say watch them lock us in.
What they did to Brandon Straka and Dr Simone Gold was a shameful disgrace. That was not a Free Republic. That was a Communist State. The fake news is still going off about it.
CTV is reporting that "Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is stepping down as Liberal leader, and is proroguing Parliament as the Liberal Party of Canada embarks on the journey to replace him.
In an historic announcement outside his official Rideau Cottage residence, Trudeau declared his intention to stay on as prime minister until a new leader is chosen." Oh happy day.
Bill Gates' Communist News Network is reporting that "US President Joe Biden intends to ban new offshore oil and gas developments along the US coastal territory. This decision could be made on January 6, Bloomberg reports." Wait a minute. This is the guy who everyone knows is senile right?
The Deep Dive is reporting that "U.S. President Joe Biden is poised to solidify his environmental legacy by issuing a landmark executive order to permanently ban new offshore oil and gas development in specific U.S. coastal waters. This move, which is expected within days, represents a significant step in Biden’s broader strategy to combat climate change and safeguard fragile marine ecosystems." AYFKM?
Fake environmentalism Rock's the world. Natural Gas is clean burning. Twinning the Nordstream natural gas pipeline to Germany would greatly reduces world CO2 emissions and greatly improve Europe's air quality by phasing out Industrial coal. This delusional decision has nothing to do with climate change or the environment. This is about the UN ND the WEF's joint Agenda to create mass inflation and universal slavery.
We all know why the price of food in the grocery stores spiked. Joe Biden and Justin Trudeau killed domestic oil production and solidified the Saudi oil monopoly so Saudi could jack up the price of gas as high as they wanted. Jacking up the price of fuel jacks up the price of everything we buy in stores because it's transported there by trucks.
CNN is reporting that "Biden plans to ban some offshore drilling in a way Trump would struggle to undo." Joe Biden's shadow government is delusional. There are intentionally trying to escalate war with Russia when they know Trump will deescalate that conflict and they are intentionally trying to derails Trump economic prosperity plan by making energy affordable.
Remember how Alberta always complains about transfer payments? Newfoundland is no longer a have not province. Google AI is reporting that "Offshore drilling in Newfoundland and Labrador is a major contributor to the province's economy, and is the third largest source of oil in Canada."
There have been a couple of highly ridiculous ISIS attacks lately that we need to talk about. The CIA created ISIS in Syria to justify dragging the US into the pipeline war there. That is a fact. After they assassinated the Iranian general responsible for defeating ISIS in Syria, the CIA created ISIS K in Pakistan.
It was obvious the CIA used that proxy terrorist organization they created to launch an attack within Russia. Since that was so obvious they are now launching attacks on US soil to make it look like they don't control ISIS K when we all know they do.
The New York Times who trash the Falun gong and Shen Yun while they promote Chinese Communism just launched an article that claims How the Islamic State Radicalizes People Today. That is ridiculous and it was published January 4th 2025.
These coordinated News reports are part of an Operation in support of an Agenda. With Trump in office the CIA is losing power so this is their not so subversive attempt to take it back.
Yesterday I watched a riveting show on Netflix called Carry on. It was about how a highly organized group of Americans blackmailed an airport baggage screener into letting a suitcase containing a bomb with Russian nerve gas on the plane. They threatened to kill his pregnant girlfriend.
It was a little bit intense and I had to fast forward to the end to make sure it had a positive ending before I continued watching it as they as they threatened him to do bad things along the way.
The moral of the story is that this wasn't ISIS or the Russians. It was the Americans Military Industrial complex committing a terrorist attack on American soil so they could blame it on the Russians to justify more tax dollars spent on weapons they build. Sound familiar? Buyer Beware.
Colion Noir recently did a review of the Desert Eagle and I think it's worth discussing. For most the Desert Eagle is the coveted addition to any gun collection. Yet he talks about why he hates that gun after finally firing it.
He said the recoil was very unpleasant. Obviously the Desert Eagle initially came in two sizes .357 and .44 magnum. The .50 cal was an afterthought and that seems to be what everyone obsesses over. I've never shot a .50 cal and I have no desire to do so. For me .22 is too small and .50 cal is too big. I like anything and everything in between.
It turns out Colion got a .50 cal. No wonder it has massive recoil. I read somewhere that a .50 cal has 38% more recoil than a .44 which is significant. For me that would be like the difference between firing a .44 pistol and a 12 gauge shotgun with a pistol grip. I found the .44 fine but I found the the pistol grib on a 12 gauge shotgun very uncomfortable. I didn't like it. I mush prefer to shoulder a shotgun.
Colion showed a clip of him firing a .44 Ruger Red hawk and how much he liked it. My range buddy has one and I tried it. The first thing I noticed was the balance. My Smith and Wesson .44 is evenly balanced. His Red hawk is very noticeably top heavy. They do that for a reason. To stop the muzzle from going up.
Colion said he used to laugh at a video of a girl firing a Desert Eagle and the barrel recoiled up and hit her in the head. He said now he understands why that happens. That's why the Ruger Red hawk is top heavy. To reduce that muzzle flip.
We've all heard the story of the cop who tried firing a Dessert Eagle for the first time with one hand. It's a semi automatic not a revolver. As soon as he fired one shot the muzzle flip forced it strait up and the recoil cause him to fire a second shot by accident. That recoil caused him to accidentally fire two more shots. He ended up firing one shot down range and three into the ceiling. That was very unsafe.
The moral of the story is if you're firing a Desert Eagle for the first time use both hands and only load one round in the magazine. Especially if you're starting off with a .50 cal.
Double action revolvers are much safer in the sense that because they are double action it's much harder to fire a second or third shot into the ceiling by accident. That's more of a concern with semi automatics.
The Desert Eagle is a very large and heavy pistol. That means in .357 or .44 the weight of the gun would help offset the recoil. A .357 Desert Eagle should be fine. I was at DVC many years ago and they had a Tommy gun converted to single shot. I was surprised at how heavy it was. It fired a .45 but because the firearm was so heavy there was very little recoil and it was surprisingly accurate.
A word on Gun Ownership and Mass Shootings
With all the insane government over reach we've seen there is a lot of push back on gun ownership. Gang members don't use legally obtained registered firearms to commit a crime. They use illegal unregistered firearms. They call them throw aways because they can't be traced so the leave them at the scene. The reason they do that is so they aren't caught with it later on.
Mass shooting are a bit different because it revolves around someone who is mentally unstable. A coworker asked me what's to stop me from using one of my guns if someone pisses me off. My first answer was simple. Legal gun owners are meticulous about the rules because gun ownership is so sacred to them they don't want to lose that privilege.
The example I gave was road rage. I said if I get in a fight with someone I automatically second guess myself because if I was to get charged with assault I'd lose all my guns. I avoid conflict simply because I don't want to lose my guns.
However, after thinking about it there's another reason. What's to stop me from using my guns on someone that's pissed me off? Me. Do you have knives in your home? Have you ever had a desire to fatally stab someone with those knives? What's stopping you? You are.
I've had huge chef knives since I was 19 and I have never had a desire to stab someone with those knives my entire life. Now I will agree guns are a bit different because they are so easy to fire. Fatally stabbing someone is very violent but pulling a trigger is relatively easy. That's why I say you never pick up a firearm in anger. That's why we have safety training.
Control the muzzle. Never point a firearm at someone. Ever. The Americans have a different rule. They say never point a firearm at something you don't intend to kill or destroy. That's a bit excessive but it reinstills the seriousness of pointing a firearm at someone.
I was at the gun store a while ago before the hand gun freeze and I was looking at pistols. I picked one up and sighted it to see how it felt in my hand. Someone working behind the counter walked towards the path of the gun I was holding so I lowered it and asked where's a safe firing direction.
The person behind the counter showing me the gun said point it at me. I know it's unloaded. I just shook my head and said I am not pointing an unloaded firearm at you. I won't do it. That's the way I was trained. Years ago my daughter had a friend over visiting from the States.
She said oh I took that firearm course back home. They taught us when you shoot someone you have to shoot to kill. My daughter and I both looked at each other in shock and I said our firearm training in Canada is a bit different. Control the muzzle, finger off the trigger, always assume the firearm is loaded. Our training is to prevent accidental discharges so we don't kill anyone.
Mass Shooting that are Orchestrated
My coworker was concerned about mass shootings. He said someone did a mass shooting with a handgun in England and they banned handguns. They haven't had a mass shooting since. My first response was I didn't think you were allowed to own guns in England. That's why stabbings are so common.
However, the whole idea of a mass shooting with a handgun is pretty unrealistic. Our pistol magazines are pinned at 10 rounds. Yes you can get over capacity magazine illegally but how many do you have. Revolvers are usually just 5 or 6 rounds and are very slow to reload.
Semi automatic pistols are very fast but once you run out of magazines, reloading a semiautomatic pistol magazine is slower than reloading a revolver.
Steven Seagal once said he thinks many of the mass shootings in the US are orchestrated. So do I. Take the Orlando shooting. There was way too many rounds fired for there to have been just one shooter. It was ridiculous. The guy they claimed did it was a Gay Muslim. Why would a Gay Muslim shoot up a Gay bar he frequented. It didn't make sense. He was just someone they shot and blamed it on.
The only motive for that shooting was gun control. The leftists want to ban the AR 15 so they orchestrated an event to justify banning it. Just like the Nova Scotia mass shooting. Other than gun control that mass shooting had no motive. There were also a dozen other shady things associated with that shooting.
The shooter had been paid a large sum of money from the RCMP. Two plain clothes RCMP officers were caught red handed shooting up a fire hall where civilians were being protected during the lock down. That was obvious.
Then there's that police agent from Nova Scotia who was involved with that fake cartel bust in Edmonton, released early from prison only to help orchestrate the Nova Scotia mass shooting. That whole thing was shady.
Even that bank robbery on Vancouver Island that wasn't a bank robbery. They robbed the bank then waited for the police to arrive to have a shootout with the police. That was bizarre. It made no sense. Gun control was the only motive.
One of the reasons I'm so passionate about gun ownership is because I see the Intelligence community's obsession to remove that right. When I see them orchestrate mass shootings to justify their agenda that makes me very concerned.
Having said that, I realize different people are going to have different opinions. My lawyer friend supports gun control, I do not. He's not my enemy. He's smart and has his own opinion. Nobody likes mass shootings.
My coworker that asked what's stopping me from using my guns on someone that pissed me off. Although he's starting to support Trump and Pierre Poilievre, he's not comfortable with gun ownership because of mass shootings. I respect his opinion.
For me it's important but it's not crazed. I've heard some people say what it's going to take is for some people to get in a shootout with the police when they come to confiscate legally obtained firearms. My response is no it's not. That's exactly what they want. They want some wacko to have a shoot out with the police to justify taking them all away forever.
I believe in the rule of law. If they make a law banning certain firearms I'm going to vote against that law and against any politician who supports that law. I'm not going to shoot a cop for enforcing that law. Aside from target shooting and hunting the purpose of gun ownership is self defense. As Candace Owens said growing up when the racists would shoot at her home, her grandfather would shoot back.
Sailor's rights. Protection of persons and property. If ANTIFA or a mob of lawless thugs start rioting and looting in theory your firearms are to protect your family and property from them. If they riot with the police then we outflank them and support the police. We support law and order.
We never get in a shootout with the police. Ever. Even if the police become corrupt. If the police become corrupt then we surrender our weapons and sue the police. We support law and order. We don't cross that line and endorse crazy. We endorse logic, reason and morality. That is what we endorse.
Today I got up early to get some groceries. The rain had finally stopped and the ground was wet. From a distance I hear an eagle cackle. I look up and see two seagulls were soaring over my head. That's not it I thought. I kept hearing it but I couldn't see it. Then I looked closely at the top of a familiar old cedar tree and there it was perched at the very top. I could see it's head turn and look straight at me as I bowed in respect.
I guess it migrates and stops there every year along it's journey. Then at Superstore I heard them play I'm not OK by Jelly Roll. That's the first time I've heard that song. That ain't me.
It has a peaceful tune and a good intent but I'm not sure I can relate. I am OK. I also have difficultly buying into Merk's obese facial tat victim drama the Babylonian horde follows. I find it very ascetically unpleasing and painful to watch. Let's do what we've got to do and move forward. Tomorrow will be a better day.
As Daniel said, "O man greatly beloved, fear not: peace be unto thee, be strong, yea, be strong." Joshua said the same thing. Two of you shall chase a thousand. Word.
