Ottawa life is reporting that "Paul Palango’s Anatomy of a Cover-Up: The Truth about the RCMP and the Nova Scotia Massacres is a gripping and deeply unsettling exposé that continues to dominate Canadian bestseller lists—including the Toronto Star and The Globe and Mail—for good reason."
"Drawing on thousands of pages of commission documents, interviews, and forensic evidence, Palango builds a compelling case that the RCMP’s handling of the tragedy was not just flawed but potentially compromised. He explores the possibility that Wortman may have had ties to law enforcement or was acting as a police agent—an explosive theory that the commission largely sidestepped. The book doesn’t just ask hard questions—it demands accountability."
Paul Palango's new book definitely opens Pandora's box but his conclusions are completely different from my conclusions. He cites a whole list of abnormalities and falsified evidence then basically says nothing to see here folks. The RCMP suck and need to be disbanded. That's all there is but is it really?
When investigating a crime we need to examine means and motive. We consider alternate theories. If we refuse to admit 9/11 was an inside job and we refuse to examine orchestrated events, then we pretty much miss the whole point of a real investigation. Is it simply a whitewash? I didn't think so but if we refuse to examine the obvious it starts to look that way.
The mainstream media is worthless. Trying to win them over is pointless. There are a lot of people in Nova Scotia that question the official narrative. It doesn't make sense. All the abnormalities and falsified evidence point to something else.
One X account about the Nova Scotia Mass murders talks about the missing yellow stripe on Gabe Wortman's RCMP uniform. In the surveillance video there is no yellow stripe on Gabe Wortman's pants but on an altered screen shot there is. Why would someone alter that?
Another posts asks who thinks the Democrats would stage a mass shooting and kill innocent people to justify gun control? I do and evidently I'm not the only one only it's not just Democrats. It's fake Republicans as well. 9/11 happened on George Bush's watch. Globalists on the right use false flag attacks to justify taking away civil liberty.
Gabe Wortman was a paid police informant. We assume that was for a FBI cross border gun smuggling sting. We don't actually think he was paid to execute the mass shooting but the long list of abnormalities means we aren't so sure.
Paul Polango asks if this was simply a case of domestic violence, why falsify evidence? Yet this wasn't a case of a police agent losing his mind either. It's clearly something far more sinister. Paul Polango points out that Wortman's common law spouse had a lot more disposable income than she reported on her taxes. If she was a police agent, then we can throw out her entire testimony.
Everyone knows her dramatic claims of spending the night in the woods after her escape was fabricated. Yet if she was a police agent then so were the claims of domestic violence. Wortman was a swinger. They were in an open relationship. He certainly wasn't a jealous, controlling ex. So why lie?
The fact that Gabe Wortman was a police agent is a big deal. The fact that his neighbor Peter Griffon and his common law spouse Lisa Banfield were police agents is a big deal. The fact that two undercover tactile RCMP officers were caught shooting up a fire hall where civilians were being staged is a big deal.
They shot through the roll up doors, the weakest point of the building. What if they weren't caught and they hit a civilian inside? Would they also add that to the list of people Gabe Wortman killed like they did for Corey Ellison?
Wortman's ties to the police and to the Hells Angels are a big deal. At this point considering the possibility of the mass murder being an orchestrated event isn't crazy. Refusing to consider that possibility is. We know no one is going to investigate this.
It's like the Pickton case. It's dead in the water. That doesn't mean we have to believe the BS and be swayed by it. Gun control has an agenda. Reducing violent crime is not part of it.