Friday, April 25, 2025

Cody Haevischer not allowed to subpoena crown prosecutor in his appeal. Person Y in the WPP.

There is a new decision posted on the BC Supreme court's website about Cody Haevischer's application for a judicial stay for his murder charge in the Surrey Six. 

Cody is the last surviving suspect in the Surrey Six who hasn't rolled. Jamie Bacon, the one who ordered the murder rolled. DK rolled. Mat Johnston mysteriously died of cancer right after Jamie Bacon risked his family's life by making that audio recording trying to convince Mathew Johnston to join Jamie Bacon in the Witness Protection Program. 

That whole investigation has been a shameful disgrace. Jamie Bacon won an appeal over trial delays and the Crown won their Appeal of the Appeal. Then IHITit lets Jamie Bacon into the Program. What a complete waste of tax dollars. If that isn't organized crime, I don't know what is.

Anyways, Cody's application for a judicial stay seemingly involved Person Y. We all know who that is. Person X became person Y and you know who became Person X. 

[5] "The allegations made by Mr. Haevischer against the Crown, and personally against Mr. Levitz, have been described in previous rulings: see, in particular, R. v. Haevischer, 2024 BCSC 1635 at paras. 28–34, 52–65 [WPP Disclosure Ruling]."

[6] "The allegations all relate to Person Y, a former criminal associate of Mr. Haevischer who cooperated with police, including as an agent, during their investigation into the murders of six people on October 19, 2007, in Surrey, B.C., known publicly as the 'Surrey Six murders'. Person Y subsequently testified for the Crown at Mr. Haevischer’s trial for those murders. By the time of the trial, Person Y was serving sentences of life imprisonment for two murders unrelated to the Surrey Six case: WPP Disclosure Ruling at para. 5."

[7] "As part of his application for a stay of proceedings, Mr. Haevischer alleges that Mr. Levitz and other trial Crown counsel deliberately and wrongfully withheld information about the entry of Person Y into the federal witness protection program (the 'WPP'), in violation of the Crown’s first-party disclosure obligations. Person Y entered the WPP on April 6, 2014, mere days after concluding his testimony: WPP Disclosure Ruling at para. 8."

First of all I'm not sure that's relevant to anything. Person Y is a hero. Cody isn't denying his involvement in the Surrey Six. His lawyer claims because the Crown failed to disclose that Person Y had entered the Witness Protection Program he should be set free. I think not. That would violate the need for natural justice. 

Just like letting Jamie Bacon off for trial delays caused by the RCMP trying to cover up police misconduct would also violate natural justice. In this decision Madame Justice Martha M. Devlin quashed Mr. Levitz’s subpoena. [38]

Martha M. Devlin is a familiar name. She is also presiding over Bill Majcher's bogus case. She will see through CSIS' lies. In February 2025 Martha M. Devlin dismissed Cody's lawyer's application to cross examine nine witnesses as it was premature. There is a whole list of decisions on that case

So I get it. Natural justice demands someone take responsibility for the Surrey Six but letting Jamie Bacon off after all the IHIT misconduct was the straw that broke the camel's back. The RCMP completely screwed up that case. The Crown didn't. The RCMP did and I don't think Matt Johnston died of cancer. 

So I guess the big breaking news today is a confirmation of our suspicions. April 6, 2014 Person Y entered the Witness Protection Program after he testified in the Surrey Six Trial.

The recent decision confirms that "By the time of the trial, Person Y was serving sentences of life imprisonment for two murders unrelated to the Surrey Six case." [6] So I would assume that when he entered the Witness Protection Program he didn't have to finish his sentence. 

That's kind of what we suspected. Several years ago someone said they were giving a guy grief because he thought the guy was a rat and was in the Program. Then he got a call from the guy in prison on a burner phone. The guy put Person Y on the phone to prove he was in jail not in the program. That's when I thought isn't Person Y in the program? Turns out he was. That means the guy he was giving grief to was as well. 

As for paragraph [5] Person Y was not motivated by revenge. That was obvious. I can't say any more about that without naming him. We all know who he was and we all know revenge had nothing to do with it. He did something right because the Surrey Six was f*cked up. Jamie Bacon wanted Person Y to do it and he said no. I have no problem with letting Person Y into the program without finishing his sentence. 

All the others is a completely different matter. The current state of IHIT and the CFSEU is completely compromised. Person Y did something significant so they let him into the program. Jamie Bacon did SFA and they let him into the program for doing nothing. That was an abomination.

Letting Blaze into the program to lie about a rival instead of serving his sentence was disgusting. Paying Blaze and the rat pack all that money to lie about Cory Vallee was disgusting. Now they are going to pay them another obscene amount of money to lie about Conor D'Monte. 

The only witness to Kevin LeClair's murder saw two shooters. One was noticeably larger than the either. That was K9. Both were wearing masks. The smaller shooter's gun jammed. The larger shooter finished the job. 

Conor D'Monte and Cory Vallee are the same size. One of them is innocent. You already wrongfully convicted Cory. You can't convict them both because they're both the same size. You are paying Blaze's rent in Abbotsford while he sells crystal meth to a vulnerable person he rents out his front lawn to park a trailer on. Paying him to lie about Conner knowing he is currently selling crystal meth and is lying about Conner simply means I'll see you in hell. What we do in life, echoes in eternity. 

Thursday, April 24, 2025

Censorship of the 90 kilos of cocaine seized in Calgary

I mentioned that someone wanted me to take down a 2 year old blog post about 90 kilos of cocaine that was seized in Calgary two years ago. Let's do a little detective work and figure out who was behind that censorship attempt and why. It might explain why the BC CFSEU don't make drug busts like they do in Ontario and other provinces.

The attached PDF is a series of emails I recently received from someone making a copyright claim claiming to represent Post Media News. I just included his initial request and each response he made to my responses. 

After his first email I asked if he was counsel and who he represented. He said he represented Post Media News and claimed one doesn't have to be counsel to make a copyright claim. Yes, but that's not what I asked. The tone was how a copyright lawyer speaks. Statements like "The infringing url." The whole tone sounded like he was at one time counsel. 

My first impression was Post Media News? I have an agreement with them. I won't post any of their pictures even if I provide a link to their article. Post Media News owns the Calgary Herald now? My bad. It's hard to keep up with all their acquisitions. I'll take it down. No problem. Yet that wasn't good enough. 

They started making crazy claims that I'm not even allowed to quote the article. In the original blog post I had simply quoted one sentence from the article. I put that sentence in quotations and provided a link to the original source. The following sentence simply summarized the article. Two sentences. That was it. The intent of the blog post was to send people to that news article and read it for themselves. 

Notwithstanding that fact, the person who claimed to represent Post Media News pulled a Mat Wilcox and claimed copyright on a quotation. I knew that was ridiculous and would not stand up in court but I thought ya know, I don't even want to waste my time on this. So I found another article about the Calgary cocaine seizure and quoted that instead. 

As soon as I did that, I immediately received an email from someone claiming to represent that other news outlet claiming copyright on that same article. At that point I knew this was bullsh*t. While this was going on, I noticed the obvious. I Googled his name and he had zero Internet presence. 

Everyone has an Internet presence especially if you represent Post Media News. You either have a law firm behind you or some other public relations agency. This guy had nothing. That was a red flag. I sent an email to my friend the ninja and said have you ever heard of a guy named Robert Grubbs? He claims to represent Post Media News on a copyright claim but he has no Internet presence. Everyone has an Internet presence. 

He writes back and says he's never heard of him and can't find him on Google. If he was involved with Corporate copyright, my friend the ninja would have heard of him. That's his thing. 

So I forward him some of the correspondence and said this sounds like a scam. The picture he claimed copyright to was a police handout. Post Media News didn't own the copyright to it. He lied. My friend the ninja writes back and says Gmail? This doesn't sound right. You should check with the Calgary Herald which I had already done. No response. 

So the guy was using a fake name, a fake email address, lied about representing Post Media News and lied about owning copyright to the picture. Yet it didn't sound like Blaze. I joked with the ninja and said maybe Blaze is using Chat GPT. 

In my last response included in the PDF I said I'm going to need to see some ID. I need to know who you are and proof that you do in fact represent Post Media News. Not a word since. 

However, as I said, as soon as I quoted and linked to an article about the cocaine seizure from a non Post Media News source, someone claiming to represent that other media source emailed me and made a copyright claim on that same article that no one reads. That was obviously too much of a coincidence to believe. That was definitely Blaze's MO. He always pretends to be someone he's not, making ridiculous claims. 

Yet again the wording of the request didn't sound like Blaze. The attached PDF shows the emails I received from them and my responses. Again when I demanded to see ID and proof of who he represented not a word after that. That is also Blaze's MO. He'll disappear after you catch  him in a lie. 

Third time's a charm. 9 times out of 10, when someone makes a copyright claim, it's not about copyright. They're trying to censor something. When I had the second set of fake emails about the Calgary cocaine bust I thought to myself what are they trying to censor? April 3rd I received an email from someone claiming to be Jason Jamie Chan about that same blog post. 

I simply asked them, let's see some ID. Blaze impersonates people all the time. I need to know who I am speaking with before I have a conversation with them. 

I'm all for giving people a second chance. My concern is that there has been so many lies and false claims about that post I want to know why. The BC CFSEU is a shameful disgrace. We need to address that before we censor that.

I also noticed that someone filed a copyright DMCA notice on April 19th 2025 to Goggle to have something removed from their search results. They are claiming copyright to a statement made in the second news article I linked to from Livewire Calgary.

This means Livewire Calgary did not make the complaint. Someone claimed ownership of a quote in the Calgary Live wire article I linked to. They claim the original work was found on Tumbler.com. OK this is getting bizarre. 

First we had someone falsely claim they represented Post Media News regarding an article published in the Calgary Herald. Then we had someone falsely claim they represent Livewire Calgary. Now we have someone falsely claiming to represent Tumbler regarding an article published on Calgary livewire. Two interesting things come up.

The text that they erroneously claim ownership of is "Staff Sgt. Mark Rahn with the Calgary Police Service Organized Crime Operations Unit said that this latest cocaine seizure was only nine kilograms less than the CPS had seized in all of 2022."

So they are specifically trying to censor the news article about the 90 kilos of cocaine seized in Calgary two years ago by making false claims. No one owns copyright to that statement. It was quoting a Calgary Police Service press release

So what we see here is a whole lot of fraud trying to censor a news article about a Surrey Jack being involved with a Calgary cocaine bust. Take a look at where the DMCA complaint claims to originate from - Hong Kong. Isn't that ironic?

Here is the Tumbler link the fraudster claims to be the original copyrighted work the Livewire Calgary article copied. It's from the 24scam-news-blog. ROFL.

That fake blog has three posts. The one it stole from Calgary Livewire as well as one before and one after that. The first post claims to have been published January 21st 2014.  

The second post copying the Calgary Livewire article claims to have been posted April 4th 2024 and the most recent post claims to have been posted February 24th 2025. They have obviously altered the dates of the blog posts. 

That's someone going through a whole lot of trouble and committing a whole lot of fraud, just to censor one news article about 90 kilos of cocaine seized in Calgary en route to Surrey.

Oh wow. Adam Jones has recently made multiple DMCA complaints regarding that same article. They also want Google to remove from their index an article about the Calgary cocaine bust found in the Western standard news.

Oh my. On March 29th 2025 that same Adam Jones filed a DMCA complaint against boyfriendtv.com. He claims "It was nude content that I have taken down from stripchat." Yo man, that's a little TMA. On March 23 2025 he did another. On March 27 2025 he did another. On March 29 2025 he did yet another

So in April (Charles) Adam Jones filed two bogus DMCA complaints about the Calgary cocaine news article. In March he flied 4 DMCA complaints about pictures or videos he posted on stripchat being posted elsewhere. Then he files a whole bunch of DMCA complaints about models in their company

On the two DMCA complains he filed about the Calgary news article he claimed he was from Hong Kong. On all the other DMCA complaints he filed he claimed he was from the US except for the February 14 2024 one where he claims he's from Canada

This article claims that "Levin Law Firm has been known to represent travel and nature photographer Charles Adam Jones and send letters on his behalf." Can I say that? Please advise.

Toronto Police fatally shoot man with a gun at the Airport

MSN is reporting that "Police fatally shot a man who was “in distress” at Toronto’s Pearson International Airport this morning, sparking a major response as the airport was on lockdown. A 30-year-old man was killed in the incident at the airport’s Terminal 1 Departures shortly before 7 .a.m. Thursday, authorities confirmed."

Peel Regional Police officers were investigating a man in distress in an SUV at Terminal 1 departures, Ontario’s Special Investigations Unit said in a statement. Officers located the man and early information received indicates he produced a firearm. Three officers discharged their firearms at the man. The man was taken to a hospital and pronounced dead."

A man in distress produces a firearm at the airport. That's a whole lot of stupid. The National Post is reporting that "The incident occurred near the departures area, where an SUV was parked. When police arrived, a security guard was already with a group of people, said Peel Regional Police Chief Nishan Duraiappah. Article content Three officers tried to de-escalate the situation. 'However, abruptly, one of the individuals produced a firearm at our officers,' said Duraiappah." That is crazy.

Ontario Police seize 100 kilos of cocaine tied to Nova Scotia and the Outlaws MC

CTV is reporting that "Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) say they have seized more than 100 kilograms of suspected cocaine following a months-long drug trafficking investigation spanning across the Greater Toronto and Niagara areas and Nova Scotia."

"In January, OPP’s Biker Enforcement Unit launched a joint investigation with various local police services into suspected drug trafficking activity allegedly conducted by Outlaws Motorcycle Club gang members in St. Catharines, Ont. Through their investigation, police say they discovered large quantities of cocaine were being trafficked and distributed throughout the GTA and East Coast."

"Police executed a search warrant at a home in Richmond Hill on April 4, where they say they seized about 101 kilograms of suspected cocaine and more than $215,000 in cash. As a result, police arrested four people, including one full-patch member of the motorcycle gang."

"Randy McGean, Sherry Stillwell, Cody Soulliere and David Crothers have been charged with a total of eight offences, for possession of proceeds of crime and possession of purpose of trafficking cocaine." 

"On April 5, OPP say they tipped off the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in Nova Scotia, where they conducted a vehicle stop and found about five kilograms of suspected cocaine, as well as a rifle, ammunition and high-capacity magazines. Police say the driver of that vehicle was arrested." This is what the BC CFSEU is supposed to do but don't. Ask yourself why.

The four men arrested were from St. Catharines, Ontario. July 2020 47 year old Randy McGean applied for early release from a previous cocaine trafficking charge due to a leukemia diagnosis. He even claimed he was considering MAIDS. 5 years later he's alive and well dealing large quantities of cocaine. 

In his previous cocaine charge Randy was a member of the Outlaws MC. So I guess this time it wasn't the HAs. 

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

Gina Carano in Angel dust

90 kilos of cocaine seized in Calgary two years later

April 7th 2023 I reported on 90 kilos of cocaine being seized in Calgary by the police and two suspects were arrested.

The Calgary Police Service sent out a press release about that drug bust. They reported that:

"Steven Christopher FERA, 45, of Calgary, and Jason Jamie CHAN, 38, of Surrey, are charged with two counts each of possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking. They will next appear in court on Friday, April 14, 2023."

Two years later not a word about the charges on the bust. Just a troll committing multiple acts of fraud desperately trying to erase the memory of there ever being one. That is highly suspicious.

Why is Blaze so obsessively concerned about that specific post? Why is Blaze still on the PoPo's payroll? The BC CFSEU is still completely compromised. We need to contract that out. 

Tuesday, April 22, 2025

Israeli probe into killing of Palestinian emergency workers finds professional failures

Update: Israel steps up strikes in Gaza, officials warn health care could collapse amid blockade

CBC is reporting that "An Israeli probe into its soldiers' deadly shooting of 15 emergency workers last month in Gaza says it has found evidence of professional failures and a deputy commander will be fired."

"Israel at first claimed the Palestinian medics' vehicles did not have emergency signals on when troops opened fire but later backtracked. Cellphone video recovered from one of the medics appeared to contradict Israel's initial account."

"Eight Red Crescent personnel, six Civil Defence workers and a UN staffer were killed by the Israeli troops conducting operations in Tel al-Sultan, a district of the southern Gaza city of Rafah, before dawn on March 23."

"Troops then bulldozed over the bodies along with their mangled vehicles, burying them in a mass grave. UN and rescue workers were only able to reach the site a week later to dig out the bodies. The head of the Palestinian Red Crescent Society has said the slain men were targeted at close range."

OK so let's back that up. First they lied about the emergency lights. Then, after they shot them, they used bulldozers to trample their dead bodies with the emergency vehicles and buried them in a mass grave. That was all very intentional. 

Notice what else they said. Targeted at close range. They were intentionally executed for being rescue workers and if any non citizen protests that humanitarian atrocity, Donald Trump will deport them so he can build a casino and erect a golden statue of himself on their graves in Gaza. That is ungodly.

TRT Global is reporting that "The Palestine Red Crescent has rejected the findings of an Israeli military investigation that blamed operational failures for the killing of 15 Gaza emergency service workers, denouncing the report as full of lies".

"The report is full of lies. It is invalid and unacceptable, as it justifies the killing and shifts responsibility to a personal error in the field command when the truth is quite different."

Exactly. That was my point. It wasn't an operation error. It was complying with a direct order. On October 7th the IDF was caught firing on Israelis during the facilitated attack. That wasn't an operational error, that was a direct order. 

When one of the fighter jets saw the American flag on the USS Liberty they refused to fire on an ally. That soldier was ordered to fire and threatened with court martial if he didn't. The attack on the USS Liberty wasn't an operational error. It was a direct order from President Johnston. The attack didn't stop until a Russian spy ship showed up to witness and record it. 

Monday, April 21, 2025

Police shooting during traffic stop in North York



Leaked body cam footage doesn't really show anything. It kind of looks like the kid in the backseat pulled a gun. If that is a gun, then case closed. What a stupid thing for a kid to do. What a waste of a young life. Lethal threat justifies a lethal response. 



“There was a total of six occupants in the vehicle that was stopped. The vehicle is littered with bullet holes. There are a lot of cartridge cases. We don’t know which cartridge cases belong to which weapon, or if there may have been a third weapon, but we believe there is a firearm in that vehicle.”

CP24 posted a video of two police officers who opened fire on a driver of a vehicle at a traffic stop after an altercation. Did the suspect have a gun? Yes or no? It was pretty unsafe. People driving by. Civilians right beside one of the cops. If he had a gun it shows what kind of dangers police risk every day. If he didn't then WTF. CBC posted a video from a bit further back.

6AK_TV is reporting that the kid with the gun was Wassi from the Driftwood Crips. That is seriously f*cked up. Pulling a gun on a cop. Now you're dead. Stupid and dead. Now the hammer is going to fall on the Driftwood Crips. That's one dead heat bag. If the cops didn't shoot him the club would have. 

The Dirty Newz wrote about the Easter Sunday shootout.

This is taking it to the next level. Gang bangers always shoot each other they don't shoot cops. We had one incident at the Vancouver airport when police started to chase a car that was involved in a shooting and the car started shooting at the police. That was unprecedented. This North York case is far worse. 

This is what we mean by heat bag. Now the police are going to get search warrants to search every member of the Driftwood Crips home. Now the police are going to get an increased budget and more tax dollars to follow Driftwood Crips around and bust them for drugs and guns. 

All these wannabes want to be someone important but this stunt has done the opposite. It hasn't made him look cool it's made him look like a fool. A dead fool so now he will be remembered for all eternity as an idiot and he can never fix that.

Think about it. You're in the back seat of a car full of five other people. Cops pull you over for not having a font plate. They can't search you or the car, they can just give you a ticket. You've got a cop on the front left beside the driver and a cop beside you on the rear right. You pull a gun on the cop on the rear right knowing there's another cop on the other side. 

This isn't television. They're not going pull out their guns and say drop the weapon. This is real life. If you point a gun at a cop that's is a lethal attack. That cop is legally justified in using lethal force in response. If you had a knife he might put one in your leg if your lucky but that is highly unlikely. 

If you have a gun and you point it at a cop, he's isn't just going to put one in your chest, he's going to do a mag dump in your chest and no one is going to complain. So that was a really stupid thing to do. You put your ladies life at risk was well for nothing. For no reason. You died for nothing. For no reason. They're not going to sing songs about your nobility. They're going to sing songs about your stupidity.

Damion Ryan hired Lil Man from the Driftwood Crips to kill Mo in the DTES.  Then Damion Ryan had his peeps roll on Lil Man after he did the hit. Not a word about that. 

We just saw that ridiculous false claim about wanting to kill dissidents for Iran and not a word since. They made that bullsh*t claim so Damion Ryan would roll on the Area 43 guys from Montreal her hired in the DTES. Damion Ryan rolled on them too because that's what Damion Ryan does. 

Podcast with Peter Merrifield Paul McNamara

5th Anniversary of the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting

Paul Palango, the author of 22 Murders, as well as the forthcoming Anatomy of a Cover-Up: The Truth about the RCMP and the Nova Scotia Massacres recently published an article in the Globe and Mail and did a recent podcast about the event.

People's attitude is indeed changing. The public inquiry was a farce as was expected. Cover up is an understatement. Gabe Wortman was a police agent. The large sum of money deposited into his bank account came from the RCMP not from organized crime. So that's one big unanswered question.

The two RCMP officers caught shooting up a Fire hall protecting civilians during the event claimed they were firing at what they thought was the suspect. That was a lie and the fake inquiry dropped it so nothing has been answered

Peter Griffon was also a police agent.

I believe it was a orchestrated event to rationalize gun control. Yet none of the guns that were alleged to have been used were legally obtained so using that orchestrated event to justify more gun control is a complete farce. I don't believe Wortman did it. 

I have some more information on this that I'm going to reveal but I'm going to wait until Paul's second book comes out and see where that takes us. Then I'm going to hit the real issue. The one that no one wants to talk about. After Paul opens the door, I'm going to walk through it just because I can.