I see two different polarized extremes rise and I reject them both. The Toronto Star is reporting that "A bill in British Columbia’s legislature to prevent publicly funded employees from making Indigenous land acknowledgements failed to pass first reading, but reveals a schism between provincial Conservative members."
"The bill proposed by One BC’s Dallas Brodie would have prohibited what it calls acknowledgements that deny sovereignty of the Crown and attribute collective guilt based on race, ancestry or actions of Canadian historical figures. Most members of the legislature voted against it, but Conservatives Heather Maahs and Harman Bhangu joined Brodie and Tara Armstrong, also of One BC, as well as Independent Jordan Kealy in voting for the proposed legislation."
OK I support the bill and I'll telly you why. I believe all people are equal. I disagree with white privilege and I disagree with red privilege. There is no privileged. Everyone is equal.
The whole idea behind the orange shirt campaign is that it was wrong for residential schools to say your culture is bad. I agree. However, if it was bad then, it's bad now.
I believe in the Canadian Mosaic and the sacred hoop. No one race is any better than any other. This whole perpetual victimization has become absolutely toxic. We are all responsible for what we do. We need to own that.
The land acknowledgement does deny the crown. It also denies Canada and the Charter of Rights. The inherit right to self government means the door is open to bring slavery back and I reject that completely. Telling me over and over again that my heritage is bad is just as wrong now as it was in residential schools. We will never get past this. Ever.
I hate to say it but John Rustad isn't the problem, Á’a:líya Warbus is. She was made House Leader based on privilege and has pushed an extreme agenda that has divided and fractured the party. She refused to recognize any concerns on the other side that has resulted in Church burning. That is hateful.
Take a look at the top of that page. It states "The Pride Advocacy Group respectfully acknowledges that this event is taking place on stolen land that overlaps with the unceded traditional and ancestral First Nations territories of the Musqueam, Katzie, Semiahmoo, Tsawwassen, Qayqayt, and Kwikwetlem; and with the lands of the Kwantlen First Nation, which gifted its name to this university. In the cause of reconciliation, we are committed to combating ongoing systemic colonialism and the oppression and racism that Indigenous Peoples continue to experience."
Now let's break it down. "This event is taking place on stolen land." That is a lie and it is a direct attack on Canadian sovereignty. In Canada, the British made treaties and were involved in the fur trade. In Central America the Spanish Conquistadors slaughtered the aboriginals. In the US they shot them dead. Canada was founded on different principles that we can be proud of.
Notice that they name 7 different tribes all claiming ownership of the same land. That's because different tribes fought over the same land. Because of overlapping claims there are more outstanding land claims in BC then there is land in BC. That means no land for anyone else. That means we are going to have to compromise and share.
The Natives in Fort Langley got along well with the British fur traders because the British protected them from raiding tribes that would kidnap slaves. Colonialism is over. The continued use of that term points to the Red Braid Alliance for Decolonial Socialism. Communists trying to destroy the Canadian Charter of Rights. This whole Q plus agenda in schools is evil.
Fraser Valley Today reported that "Chilliwack’s two MLAs have been divided on a controversial proposed bill to ban public agencies from Indigenous land acknowledgements."
The article states "MLA for Vancouver-Quilchena Dallas Brodie proposed the Land Acknowledgement Prohibition Act on Thursday morning (Oct. 23). 'Land acknowledgments are the anthem of a suicidal nation,' said Brodie in her bill introduction. 'They are recited in classrooms, board rooms, and before virtually every public event. They’re repeated ritualistically to instill the belief that our country is illegitimate and that Canada has no right to exist, that our ancestors are evil, and our history must be abrogated.'” That acknowledgement is hateful.
A’aliya Warbus voted against the bill while Heather Maahs voted for it. Thus the split in Chilliwack MLAs. Chilliwack is concerned about SOGI which goes well beyond LGBT. SOGI is about the sexualization of young children in school.
One elementary school library book called Identical, was about identical twins. One was being sexually abused by their father and the other was not. The twin that wasn't being sexually abused by their father was jealous of her sister who was. Giving that kind of book to young children to read in mentally deranged. It is child abuse. StopSOGI.ca lists some of the insane books.
In the election Á’a:líya Warbus was very eloquent about the NDP's spending and drug promotion. Those are conservative values. Yet she also has a very dark agenda. Promoting the trans lifestyle is only part of it. She wants to destroy Canadian sovereignty. She claims to oppose bullies but she has become one. When someone expresses a concern about church burning she defiantly shuts those concerns down and promotes the decolonial socialism agenda. That is not a Conservative value.
At first I thought this One BC party was hateful. Now I understand they're not. A’aliya Warbus is hateful and her dark agenda will indeed destroy Canada just like it has destroyed the Conservative party in BC. Buyer Beware.
