Never accept Hate or their False Narrative

Last week I woke up to my alarm for work and a commercial came on from the Broadcasters Association of British Colombia. It was going on an on about opposing hate pushing the same old false narrative. These anti hate circus freaks are the most hateful people on the planet so we're going to do a deep dive illustrating it and the root cause of it.

Brando Straka is the leader of the Walk Away movement. His landmark testimonial said he originally he left the right because he opposed their hate. Then the left changed and became far more hateful than the right so he left the left and started the Walk Away movement encouraging LGBT and everyone else to leave the Democrat party because of the hate. He nailed it.

Gays Against Groomers don't hate Gays. They hate child grooming. They hate the sexualization and exploitation of children as we all should. Hate the sin love the sinner. It's OK to hate the sin. I'm not talking about hating people who have a different opinion than you but there's nothing wrong with hating child molestation. That's why Blaze persistently falsely accuses people who disagree with his far left liberal lies of being child molesters.

He falsely accuses people of things to try and discredit them to hide his own misconduct. Yet while he's falsely accusing people of being child molesters he is at the same time promoting child molestation by claiming if you are anti SOGI you are anti Gay. Blaze even had the audacity to recently call me hateful. That freak is the most hateful person on the planet only he doesn't hate sin he hates morality. Sound familiar? That's what this all boils down to.

ANTIFA are filled with hate yet they claim they oppose hate. That is a lie. They promote hate by promoting lies just like the Broadcasters Association of BC. ANTIFA call themselves Anti Fascists. They hate Fascism. We all do. Only they claim everyone who disagrees with the World Economic Forum's twisted brand of Communism is a Fascist. Let's face it, ANTIFA built the Berlin Wall. They were Communists who built a wall to keep people prisoners but they claimed it was to keep the Western Fascists out. Everything about their position is a lie. They promote lies so they can promote hate and this brings us back to the Father of all lies and the root of the conflict. One side hates sin and slavery. The other side hates morality and freedom.

It's like the BC Law Society. They were passionately opposed to law students from Trinity Western University being accepted into the bar. Remember the Charter of Rights protects the freedom of religion. You can't ban Muslims or Christians or Jews or Sikhs from becoming lawyers just because you disagree with their morality but that's exactly what that conflict was about.

It was humorous to hear the Law Society complain about Trinity Western University's moral commitment for their students. After all, you wouldn't want a lawyer with morals. That would be a conflict of interest. Lawyers become judges for heaven's sake and we can't have judges with morals. That would ruin everything.

The rainbow flag used to represent inclusion. Now it represents hate especially the new version of that flag. It no longer represents LGBT. Now it represents Q + which includes any and every perversion known to man and any we haven't even thought up yet. It represents pedophilia, sadomasochism, beastuality and even Satanism. One of the Drag Queen groups grooming young children in school to change their gender without their parents consentt were Satanists.

Even that clown that was selling transgender gear though Target was a Satanist. Then the media lied and said Conservatives falsely accused him of being a Satanist. The media lied. He is a Satanist. He even wore a shirt that said Satan respects pronouns. The term Q + is infinite. It means we not only accept and protect MAPS - Minor Attrackted Persons, we hate anyone who doesn't. If you don't accept and protect pedophiles then you are a Fascist. That is ridiculous.

We all have to draw a line somewhere. I draw my line at LGBT. I reject Q + because it's infinite. It includes pedophilia, bestiality and Satanism. People have a right to be Satanists but they do not have a right to push their religion on my kids or my grand kids in school. Satanists hate morality. They hate traditional family values. They are obsessed with destroying the family so they can destroy society and create order amidst the chaos - their order and that doesn't include freedom.

Theresa Tam is circus freak

No lie can live forever. We all know when viruses replicate themselves they get weaker not stronger. That is the science. Omicron was less severe than the seasonal flu. That's why they're not calling it Omicron any more they went back to calling it Covid even though it has replicated yet again after Omicron so is even weaker. These lunatics are criminally insane. Theresa Tam is a circus freak. So is Bonnie Henry. Race has nothing to do with it. Dishonesty does.

Instead of wearing a mask, Theresa Tam should just start a GoFundMe for her desperately needed orthodontic work. I doubt Justin Trudeau's Communists would freeze and seize that.

The Symptom Burden of Post-Covid Vaccine Injury Syndrome

mRNA Vaccine Toxicity Free download

Health Canada's secret Covid Vaccine contracts

First of all the Covid RNA vaccines are not effective. Everyone knows that. The evidenced based data shows that you can still get Covid even if you have been vaccinated. In fact the data shows you are more likely to get Covid if you have been vaccinated so basically the vaccine doesn't work and we should demand all our tax dollars back.

They rationalized this fact by claiming if you've been vaccinated you don't get Covid as severe which is another falsehood. That may have been true with the traditional flu shot but is certainly is not true with the genetic Covid RNA shot. Vaccination showed an increase in infection because they were injecting people with live viruses not dead ones like they do in traditional vaccines.

Second, the Covid RNA vaccines are not safe. The dramatic rise in all cause mortality is evidence of that. Myocarditis never used to be a thing before RNA vaccines. RNA vaccines bypass the immune system and takes the virus right into your heart and organs. Athletes with heart problems never used to be a thing until the Covid RNA vaccines. They do more harm than good.

Drone show in Vancouver

Kid Carson is reporting that " Hey Guys... Happy Friday! Who's going to the drone show tonight? Pixel Sky Animations is putting on a synchronized LED drone show over False Creek. There'll be live performances by Ray Kash and Dezza, some mind-blowing visual art pieces, and, of course, some refreshing cocktails from Bootleggers. Sounds cool. - **Date & Time:** September 15, TONIGHT 5-11 pm - **Location:** Science World and False Creek - **Tickets:** They're priced between $49.26 to $96.12. I'm not buying tickets... I'm just going to bike over with my 2 sons and look up. I mean... come on. Hope to see some of you there!"

Venus Rising: the Morning Star

The seasons are changing. I can no longer see the sunrise on my way to work in the morning but I can see Venus. It was very bright above an orange sky over a foggy horizon. Venus is called the morning star because it's the lastt star we see on the horizon before sunrise. It's also the first star we see on the horizon after sunset. Mercury is pretty hard to spot but you can see it this month in the northern hemisphere. The next small planetary alignment takes place on January 27, 2024.

Update: The next day the same thing. this morning your could see Venus rising above an orange horizon. It was high and bright. Normally it's a bit lower on the horizon. It was all alone. Yesterday was the new moon. When the planets do align you can see them line up with Venus and the moon along an axis. So right now we can see Venus rising in the morning sky all on it's own.

I'm sure there's an astrological significance to that but it looks cool. This morning the fog was pushed down below the horizon so you could see the landscape of mountains from the freeway. When I got to work the fog was blocking the view of the mountains on the horizon but you could see them from a distance. I'm sure there's another allegory in there.



There was a bright orange horizon at sunset tonight with a red setting sun providing a backdrop to the city towers in Surrey. I'm still trying to find a nice place in Surrey to watch the sunset. It's hard to get above the trees without leaving the city. Sunrise, sunset. The morning breaks...

NDP Diverting water away from farmers in BC

Anita Krishna is reporting that "There is an eye opening documentary circulating called Stolen Water. It's about government imposed watering restrictions on BC farmers. The Natural Resource Officers and Government representatives aren’t providing answers or showing up to meetings, only making illogical demands. These restrictions ruin crops, raise grocery prices and destroy farmers. The filmmaker is Simon Hergott. Here's part 1 of my interview with Simon."

This is very timely. In my interviews on Sunday at the Khalistan referendum in Surrey we learned that India is diverting water away from farmers in the Punjab. This is the next stage after fertilizer bans in the New World Order's attack on farming on their quest to create mass starvation and mass inflation. The BC NDP is part of that insane Agenda.

The Government Wants to Control Our Food - The Coming Eco-Totalitarianism

This is the actual documentary:

Stolen Water Part 1 - Waging War On Water Rights and BC Food Security

Stolen Water Part 2 - The Battle For Water Rights Is Escalating

Stolen Water Part 3 - The Slow And Systematic Ruination Of Farmers

Means and Motive Part Two: Mass Shootings

OK so we've talked about Air India and 9/11. Then we did a deeper dive into the logistics of means and motive. Now I want to take it one step further. We've seen how means and motive can help decipher false flags. Now let's take a look at how they apply to orchestrated events such as plandemics, arson or even mass shootings. Every crime has a means and motive.

Steven Seagal thinks a lot of mass shootings are engineered and so do I. I don't think they all are but I do think some are. How many? What percentage? I have no idea but if any are that is something we need to talk about because it opens up Pandora's box. If they were willing to do that then, what else are they willing to do and why? What is their motive?

OK let's look at one. The biggest one in US history. It serves as their rationale for banning ARs. The Orlando shooting doesn't make sense. A Gay Muslim walks into a Gay bar he frequented and goes on a shooting frenzy. The biggest inconsistency in that case is the number of people shot and the number of rounds fired. 49 people dead, 53 people injured and a firefight with police. That's a lot of reloading for one AR and one handgun.

Immediately we have a problem with means and motive. It's not physically possible for one person to fire that many rounds with one AR and one hand gun. There had to have been more than one shooter. Yet the narrative claims there was no other shooter. That means there is a problem with the narrative. Again we are forced to ask, if they lied about that, what else did they lie about? Why would a Gay guy shoot up a bar full of Gay people? It doesn't make sense. He didn't go there once and get snubbed. He frequented that bar. He was a regular. There's no motive for this mass shooting and that becomes a problem because every crime has a motive.

I will admit that there is a grey area around motive when it comes to mass shooting. To execute a mass shooting you have to be crazy so the motive won't necessarily be logical. "My ex left me so I'm going to shoot her dead as well as myself." WTF? Why would you do that? It makes no sense. Yet some people do. I'm not going to Dr Phil the motive. I'm just going to say that is bat sh*t crazy.

Likewise many years ago the US Post Office used to be a pretty toxic workplace full of harassment and abuse. As a result sometimes people would snap. They'd bring a gun to work, shoot their boss and a bunch of coworkers. Hence the term going postal. I'd be like, OK you lost your job and you're angry I get it but why on earth would you bring a gun to work and shoot your coworkers? That doesn't make sense. It's not going to get your job back and it's not going to make you feel any better. It's just plain crazy.

I don't want to be creepy but I can understand if his boss was an a*shole and was harassing him, he might snap and shoot him. I'm not saying that is acceptable because it is absolutely not. I'm just saying I can see a motive. It's like the kid who gets bullied in school then snaps and comes back with a gun to shoot the bully and the other kids who stood by and watched it happen. That is not acceptable and is not an appropriate expression of anger but again I can see a motive. It's a twisted Dr Phil motive but I can see a motive. It's some of the other ones like the Orlando shooting that concern me because I can't see any motive. Other than gun control. That brings us to the biggest mass shooting in Canada.

Before we dive into that I do want to concede that not all mass shootings are orchestrated. Which brings us to the right to bear arms. There are a lot of crazy people out there. Someone said one in four have some kind of mental health issue. I don't know if that's true or not but I will admit that there are a lot of people out there with mental health issues. Consequently I'm not sure everyone should have the right to own a gun. Now I realize a lot of gun advocates are going to have an aneurysm when they hear that. Especially the Americans. Point of Order, I'm not an American. I don't have the right to bear arms entrenched in my Constituion.

Yet even in the United States, if your are a felon, you don't have the right to bear arms. I'm kinda thinking if you're mentally ill you shouldn't own a gun either. How do you define mentally ill? I don't know. Granted it's a slippery slope because where do you draw the line? I don't know. All I'm saying is that some people out there are whack jobs and should not own a gun. Personally I think owning a gun is a privileged not a right. It's a sacred privileged. Hunting should be a right. As the Assembly of First Nation Chiefs said, hunting is a treaty right.

OK so back to Canada's largest mass shooting in Nova Scotia. There are a lot of strange things in that case. Motive is the first obvious one. In that shooting gun control is the only motive. The fact that it was timed to coincide with Justin Trudeau's over reaching gun control bill and was misused to rationalize it solidifies that fact. Yet there is a ship load of anomalies in that case.

The suspect was driving around in a police car wearing a police uniform. So witnesses didn't necessarily see the suspect shoot anyone they saw someone wearing a police uniform shoot people. Which brings us back to the fire hall. After the suspect(s) embarked on a shooting rampage, civilians were gathered in a fire hall where the police protected them.

Knowing that fire hall was a safe house for civilians with a uniformed officer out front, two under cover officers went on a shooting rampage targeting the vulnerable spots of the fire hall. In the fake inquiry they claimed they thought they were shooting at the suspect who was allegedly wearing a police uniform. That is a lie. They weren't shooting at the uniformed officer out front, they were shooting at the vulnerable spots of the fire hall - the roll up doors.

That's pretty shady. On top of that the RCMP were trying to defame the dead suspect by claiming he had a large sum of money deposited into his bank account right before the mass shooting. They were trying to claim he had ties to organized crime. Then we find out it was the RCMP that deposited that money into his bank account. That's shady. That's an anomaly. The fake inquiry did not explain why the RCMP deposited that money into his account before the shooting.

None of the suspect's guns were legally obtained. Using that horrific event to rationalize gun control was a dirty deed and a political trick. The other Canadian shooting I want to discuss is the Saanich fake bank robbery. The suspects were Mathew and Isaac Auchterlonie who are sons of Bob Auchterlonie. Although they are from the exact same area they aren't the sons of Admiral Bob Auchterlonie. Yet I find it hard to believe they are not related given the unique surname and the small town they were all from. Bob's your Uncle so to speak.

The suspects robbed a bank and after they secured the money they didn't leave. They stayed and waited for the police. One witness claimed one of the suspects was eerily calm. The narrative claims they didn't want to rob the bank they wanted to have a shootout with the police yet that doesn't make sense. If they didn't want to rob the bank, why did they insist the employee get them the money? Why didn't they leave when they had the money?

The narrative claims they wanted to kill cops. That doesn't make sense. Aside from the fact, why would they want to kill cops? Why would they rob a bank and put themselves at a strategic disadvantage to let them be surrounded by SWAT? If they wanted to kill cops, why didn't they walk into a police station? Again, other than gun control, there is no motive for that shooting.

Then there's the twist. The fake news ran a picture of fake blood and a forensic mannequin at the crime scene claiming it was a picture of a dead suspect. Yet it was not. It was a forensic mannequin. However, the fake news didn't say this is a forensic mannequin, they said it was a dead suspect. Was it a mistake or another lie? We'll probably never know.

Just like when the fake news ran that video of a full hospital in Italy during Covid and claimed it was a hospital in New York, specifically in Donald Trump's home town. When they were caught they simply admitted they made a mistake.

Yet they did the same thing in Australia after that. They used the same video of a hospital in Italy and claimed it was in Australia when we all knew it was not. Lies or mistake? You tell me. They frequently said empty hospitals were overflowing with Covid patients when they were not.

BC Liberal MLA crosses floor to join the Conservatives

True North is reporting that "BC United MLA Bruce Banman is crossing the floor to join the BC Conservatives, True North has learned. The Abbotsford South MLA will announce the move Wednesday morning. This marks the second sitting MLA to leave the BC United caucus, formerly called the BC Liberals. With two sitting MLAs, the BC Conservatives will now have official party status in the legislature." Now that's what I'm talking about. That's better than the PPC.

The Logistics of Means and Motive

Update: Means and Motive Part Two: Mass Shootings

We've talked a bit about 9/11 and Air India. Now I want to dive a little deeper into the logistics of means and motive. Every crime has a means and motive. This is what we need to examine if we are going to try and solve a crime. In the Surrey Pressure Cooker Entrapment case, without the RCMP the targets had no means or motive to commit the crime. That is why it was deemed entrapment by the court. Likewise with Air India. CSIS provided the explosives.

If they had not done so the horrific tragedy never would have happened. CSIS' targets had no means of committing the crime. We'll talk about motive later. The point is Surjan Singh Gill worked for CSIS. Interesting to note that the sworn testimony of Dave Hayer's father Tara Singh Hayer conformed that the CSIS agent, Surjan Singh Gill was the one that provided the bomb. Ripudaman Singh Malik did not make it. CSIS did.

On the matter of motive, let's take a look at the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 outside Lockerbie, Scotland. The primary event that occurred during that bombing was the murder of Major Charles McKee and his team who were on their way home with evidence of the CIAs drug trafficking in Lebanon. Moammar Gadhafi had no motive to kill him and prevent him from testifying against the CIA. The only ones that had a motive to kill him was the CIA.

Now let's talk about the assassinated Indira Gandhi. Before we examine the list of suspects, let's set the stage. The CIA and the State run media assures us that two of her Sikh bodyguards murdered her. OK let's dial it back a bit. Don't you think it's a bit strange she had Sikh bodyguards? I mean if she was the one that approved Operation Blue Star wouldn't she replace her Sikh bodyguards first?

She's surrounded by Sikhs with guns and she authorizes a military attack on the Sikh leaders in the Punjab and an invasion of their most sacred holy site the Golden Temple. Something doesn't quite add up here. If she authorized that operation, she would have known that would have created a whole lot of tension with her bodyguards. I don't think she did and I'll tell you why.

Why would she hire Sikh bodyguards in the first place? That tells me two things. That tells me she didn't trust some of her own people and it shows she was definitely trying to include the Sikh community in her democracy. Do you think that might have pissed off some of the extremists in her own community? The original Gandhi was assassinated by a Hindu extremist because he felt Gandhi was being too conciliatory towards the Muslims in India.

Do you not think the Hindu extremists who murdered the original Ghandi were also upset she had Sikh bodyguards? I don't think she approved Operation Blue star. I think that was an intelligence operation and when she objected to it they killed her just like they kill Kennedy when he vetoed Operation Northwoods. Her son Rajiv was assassinated 7 years after she was.

Last Sunday when I was interviewing Sikhs outside the Khalistan referendum I heard testimony that not only was the current government of India persecuting Sikhs in the Punjab, they were also persecuting Muslims in India as well. The current government and the extremists that support it, want to purge India of other religions and languages. The intelligence community is supporting that because it is a step towards the WEF agenda. First you eliminate all religions but one then you eliminate that one final religion and Mission Accomplished.

Interesting to note, at the time the Soviet press hinted broadly at CIA involvement in the assassination of India's prime minister Indira Gandhi. The Economic Times quoted the CIA and said "USSR lost closest ally with Indira Gandhi's assassination, but would maintain ties with son."

So if Indira Gandhi and her son were both close allies with Russia then the CIA are definitely suspects in their murder. Outlook India reported that "The Jain Commission's final report focuses on a larger international conspiracy, and the CIA-Mossad-LTTE link, in the Rajiv killing."

Beyond Headlines confirms that "The final report mentions Amos Radia and Giorce Betchar as agents operating for the Israelis in India." Mossad and the CIA are joined at the hip.

Now just because Russia claims the CIA assassinated Indira Gandhi, doesn't mean they did but the fact that she was a ally with Russia means the CIA are clearly a suspect. Big Brother is not always right but Big Brother is not always wrong either. If it wasn't for the Russian spy sub that stumbled across the attack on the USS Liberty we would never have known the truth as that vessel would have been sunk according to President Johnston's orders.

What are the fact we can prove? We can prove the USS liberty was attacked. That fact is not disputed. It was attacked by an ally. Israel claimed they didn't know it was an American naval ship. That was a lie. One of the Israeli pilots that was ordered to fire on the vessel later stated he saw the American flag and refused to fire at it. He said that is an ally. He was threatened with court martial if he didn't fire on the vessel. A US Aircraft carrier heard the distress calls of the USS Liberty and dispatched air support. President Johnston recalled that air support. Those are facts.

Rebel News made MSN

MSN is quoting a National Post article that states "Canada’s environment minister has earned a rebuke in court for blocking a contentious commentator on X, formerly known as Twitter. On Monday, Federal Court Justice Russel Zinn ruled in favour of a suit filed two years ago by Rebel News founder Ezra Levant, who took Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault to court after he blocked Levant’s account on X."

“'The Honourable Minister Steven Guilbeault shall immediately cause the account @s_guilbeault to unblock the following account on ‘X,’ the platform formerly known as Twitter,' Justice Zinn wrote in his brief two-page judgement , referring to Levant’s X account @ezralevant."

"The judgement also ordered Guilbeault and his staff to not block Levant on X during the balance of his time as a member of parliament. Guilbeault was also ordered to pay Levant $20,000 within 90 days of the judgment. According to the judgment, the decision came as a result of a resolution between both parties." Sounds like it was a consent order. Been there, done that.

It's somewhat amusing that the National Post referred to Ezra Levant as a contentious commentator. Ezra Levant and Rebel News has a lot more credibility than the National Post and the other fake news outlets. If someone is honest the fake news calls them contentious. At least they didn't call him far right again. Rebel News is awesome.

"When the Rebel Yells he cries No More."