Friday, January 26, 2024
Terrorist Attack in Edmonton and 9/11
I've already talked about the refusal to recognize the fact that 9/11 was an inside job. In all fairness I don't think True North would recognize that either. Does that make True North a Psy Op? Of course not. People have a right to disagree. They tend to be blindly conservative even when some of those conservatives are actually globalists like Stephen Harper or Brian Mulroney. If we sincerely want to drain the swamp we have to be honest about the globalists on both sides.
There are a lot of conspiracies that I don't have time for and don't get involved with but 9/11 isn't one of them. 9/11 is a fundamental conspiracy that we need to address because it directly relates to the UN's New World Order. False flag attacks will be used to justify giving up civil liberty so that global communism can replace our free society.
Right now Rebel News is giving us the main stream narrative on the recent Edmonton city hall BS and I'm like WTF are you doing? Let's look at the suspicious nature of the last lone wolf terrorist false flag in Edmonton. Back in 2017 there was a very strange event where a guy ran over a bunch of people in a Uhaul. Aside from having no motive, the timing of that orchestrated event was highly suspicious. One of my blog readers was visiting Edmonton at the time and was staying in a hotel right by the epicenter of the event.
Before the attack they met another couple staying at the same hotel in the bar or restaurant. They asked why they were visiting Edmonton. The other couple said they were with 9/11 emergency dispatch there for a special convention. There were a whole bunch of emergency agencies there that weekend for a seminar discussing emergency preparedness.
After the attack my blog readers bumped into that same couple and said what was that seminar about again? The other couple became very nervous and said we signed nondisclosure agreements. We can't talk about it. Things that make ya go hmmm.
Obviously that doesn't prove anything but the timing of that event was suspicious. Now let's look at the recent lone wolf insanity in Edmonton that Rebel News is so eager to call a terrorist attack. Seemingly he was a supporter of the Palestinians in Gaza. Well isn't that convenient. Let's continue to call everyone who opposes Israel's carpet bombing of civilians in Gaza an Antisemitic terrorist. You can oppose genocide without be Antisemitic or a terrorist.
Let's remember what's going on here. The Hamas attack in Israel was completely unacceptable but they were let it. Israel let them take hostages because they had an agenda and the fake news has embraced that agenda because Israel is currently led by a globalist.
The fake news demonizes anyone who opposes Israel's carpet bombing of civilians in Gaza labeling them Antisemitic and supporters of terrorism. The purpose of that defamation is to stifle dissent. After all alternate viewpoints are a threat to their democracy.
Sikhs in the Punjab have very real concerns. The government of India has launched a campaign against farming and claim that if you object to the persecution of the Sikhs in the state of Punjab, you are a terrorist. That is ridiculous but we can see a pattern here.
So again I say this bizarre event in Edmonton is very suspicious. Edmonton won't be fooled by gender ideology but they might be fooled by false flag attacks. We still need to talk about 9/11.
World Court orders Israel to prevent acts of genocide, fails to order ceasefire
Reuters is reporting that "The World Court ordered Israel on Friday to prevent acts of genocide against the Palestinians and do more to help civilians, although it stopped short of ordering a ceasefire as requested by South Africa. South Africa brought the case to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) earlier this month, asking it to grant emergency measures to halt the fighting, which has killed more than 26,000 Palestinians."
First of all, what is a world court? Does the EU have a right to tell me what to do when I don't live in the EU? Does China? Does Russia? Does America? Giving up your sovereignty is never a good thing. Especially when we see all these absolute insane agendas come out of the UN as of late. What started off as a good idea with good intentions has clearly been hijacked by a sinister agenda. Denying farmers water and fertilizer has nothing to do with saving the environment.
Take a look at the logo outside this self proclaimed world court. It's the UN logo. The same organization behind Agenda 2030 and the New World Order. Giving that court any power or authority over us or anyone else is cleearly a road to universal slavery hidden with fake news and false flag attacks. Ezra Taft Benson was an American patriot that said we should withdraw from the UN because it has been founded by and taken over by Communists and I completely agree.
Ordering Israel or anyone else not to commit acts of genocide against civilians is not a bad thing. They ain't sayn a word about the Uyghurs in China or the Falun Gong. Not a word. That is a red flag. That means their selective concern about genocide is political ploy to advance their own agenda. Here's the problem. The UN supports the provoked conflict in the Ukraine because it has an agenda. Likewise, the UN also supports the orchestrated conflict in Gaza because they have an agenda. What is that agenda? Universal slavery. The UN does not try and sell Agenda 2030 and their New World Order as Universal slavery but that is exactly what it really is.
The UN tries to sell their misguided brand of universal slavery as Hapitalism. You will own nothing and you will be happy. That is clearly a chapter out of George Orwell. So let's compare the conflict in Gaza with the conflict in the Ukraine.
Zelensky is trying to accomplish a genocide in the Ukraine. He's even hired literal Nazi's to help him accomplish it. The Nazi's in the Ukraine want to cleanse the Ukraine of all Ukrainians of Russian heritage that don't was to join the EU's New World Order. It's not strictly a racial genocide, it's more of an ideological genocide and the UN's Agenda 2030 supports it.
The instant the Gaza conflict started the Biden Administration's war machine insisted on bundling Ukraine war support with support going to Israel for their war in Gaza. That was a red flag that demonstrated how both frauds are tied together.
Another red flag was when they said Hamas is ISIS. What did they mean by that? The CIA created ISIS. Did they also create Hamas? Evidently so. Another red flag was when they said the Hamas attack was Israel's 9/11. What did they mean by that? 9/11 ws a false falg. Was the Hamas attack? Evidently so. IDF soldiers who served on the Gaza border all testified that there is absolutely no way operatives could blow up the fence and cross over into Israel undetected.
Benjamin Netanyahu knew about the attack a year before hand. He intentionally took all the soldiers off the Gaza border and moved them to West Bank to allow the attack to happen.
The is the elephant in the room. Rebel News and the Daily Wire refuse to talk about that. Their coverage of the war in Gaza is exactly the same as the mainstream media's coverage of the war. That doesn't mean everything they put out is corrupt propaganda. It just means their coverage of Israel is clearly biased. It means we have to discuss the elephant in the room without them.
Ezra Levant from Rebel News did an awesome job covering the WEF in Davos recently. However, Benjamin Netanyahu is a globalist tied to the WEF just like Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland are. That's something Ezra is unable to admit and process.
Efrat Fenigson is an independent journalist in Israel. She's Jewish and she has served in the IDF. She has an excellent substack and out put a very good video discussing how Benjamin Netanyahu is taking away the rights of Jews in Israel under the pretext of war. That is Agenda 2030. That is the UN's New World Order. Obviously there are ulterior motives for the war in Gaza. Natrual Gas is one and the Ben Gurion Canal Project is another but the hostage taking was an orchestrated fraud. There's good and bad on both sides of the Gaza conflict.
Thursday, January 25, 2024
Federal Court stands up for Canada in rejecting Trudeau's freezing of bank accounts
Update: Feds used fake intelligence to frame Freedom Convoy as violent extremists
The Edmonton Journal is reporting that "On Tuesday, Mosley ruled against the Trudeau government’s use of the Emergencies Act to stomp out the Truckers Convoy in Ottawa in February 2022. He found the government’s use of the act to be unreasonable and an unjustified infringement of individual rights. In the ruling, Mosley focused on what I consider to be the greatest outrage the Trudeau Liberals have perpetrated to date, their freezing of bank accounts and credit cards of 57 people and entities who supported and/or attended the protest."
"Freezing the bank accounts of political opponents might well be normal behaviour for brutish leaders in shabby dictatorships. To sell such abuse in Canada, Trudeau’s allies had to work overtime to vilify the convoy participants as foreign-funded, white supremacist, FreeDumb-obsessed radicals. This campaign of misinformation continued in Ottawa when the protesters were falsely accused of arson and other misdeeds."
"In the ruling, Mosley focused on what I consider to be the greatest outrage the Trudeau Liberals have perpetrated to date, their freezing of bank accounts and credit cards of 57 people and entities who supported and/or attended the protest. But that’s not who they were. The truckers had been widely praised as heroes for venturing out to provide us with goods in the earliest, scariest days of the pandemic."
"Trudeau’s actions of freezing bank accounts and invoking the Emergencies Act were so aggressive they brought international ridicule and shame upon his government. Mosley pointed out the government’s economic order used to identify who would get their bank accounts frozen had no specific procedure. Instead it was a case of the RCMP “making it up as they went along.”
“I think that Justin Trudeau continues to behave in the most unCanadian of ways,” Wilson said. “His divisiveness, his vilifying of people, his promoting of hatred among Canadians, is not the Canada in which I was born and raised. And what I feel about today’s decision of the Federal Court is it gives me a glimpse back in time to the Canada that was about fairness and understanding and respect and reasonableness. It may still survive into the future. There is little to be done for a country where for even the most hideous violations of human rights, its courts stand by and do nothing. But Mosley’s decision does indeed provide Canada some hope."
The Five Eyes and the Surrey Pressure Cooker Bomb Plot
CTV reported that "RCMP investigators had barely finished sifting through the personal belongings of a British Columbia couple accused of planning a Canada Day terrorist attack when reporters, photographers and camera operators descended on the two-bedroom basement apartment near Vancouver, eager to get a look inside."
"The suspects' landlords, who live on the main floor of the house in a residential area of Surrey, B.C., were all too ready to oblige, allowing a steady stream of journalists to document the messy squalor inside the suite. John Nuttall and Amanda Korody were arrested on Canada Day and details of the plot were unveiled by the RCMP at a news conference the following day."
It wasn't a steady stream of journalists. It was a Post Media News exclusive.
"Images from inside the apartment -- including posters and books featuring Arabic writing, prescription methadone bottles belonging to Korody and printed photographs -- were soon beamed across the country, offering a glimpse into the lives of two suspected terrorists.
"But a civil liberties organization and a tenants' rights group are raising concerns about the fact that journalists were allowed in at all, suggesting the media tours violated tenancy and privacy laws. 'It's illegal,' said Josh Paterson, executive director of the B.C. Civil Liberties Association. 'As far as we're concerned, based on the information we know, it was illegal for the landlord to let anyone in or go in themselves.'"
Exactly. Post Media News jumped at the illegal opportunity to get an exclusive inside look at the basement suite with the sole intent of defaming the suspects. Oh but wait, there's more.
I had attended parts of the trial and became friends with the family. That was before the fall of Post Media news and the rift. Back then I had a good relationship with several different reporters.
One of the reporters saw that I was close with the family and asked me to call them on their cell so they would have my number. We were right outside the courthouse but when I saw my call on her call display it was being rerouted from another location. That's how they intercept encrypted messages. Nothing I did was encrypted. I just thought it was strange "they" were rerouting my cell phone to track it. On the first day I met John's mother and grandmother. His grandmother was a Caucasian Christian who lived in the basement suit and moved out a few days before the raid.
The grandmother didn't trust the media and didn't want to talk to them at first. Then all of a sudden she walks up to me and starts talking to me. The media noticed and surrounded us wanting her to speak to them which she eventuality started doling. It was raining. I turned to one of the reporters and asked to borrow their umbrella. Then I opened it up and held it above his elderly grandmother while she was speaking to the press.
The court took a break for lunch and one of the reporters asked me what I was doing during the break. I smiled and said I'm going out for lunch with John's mother and grandmother. Then I asked him you want it? You're welcome to join us. He passed and I said yo man this is how you get the inside story. He declined but I eagerly accepted and went for luch with them.
During lunch John's grandmother was talking about Post Media New's misrepresentation of the basement suit. She mentioned some specific things which the fake news claimed was for making bombs. She said that wasn't for making bombs, that was mine. The purpose of that fake tour was to defame and misrepresent the suspects. There's a bit more.
The reason why John's grandmother moved out of the basement suit a few days before the raid was because they were all afraid for their lives. They were convinced Mr Big was going to kill them and their entire family if they didn't do everything he told them to.
John had no idea how to make a pressure cooker bomb. Neither do I and we used to make gunpowder from scratch when I was a kid. The CIA and the FBI are the only ones who know how to make a bomb out of a pressure cooker. John was frantic because he didn't know how to do it and he thought they were going to kill him if he didn't.
Anyways, after the judge found the RCMP guilty of entrapment, John and Ana were free to go. We took my car to pick up Ana's belongings from the women's prison in Maple Ridge. John and Ana were in the back seat and John's mother was in the front passenger seat. John was dope sick. He was dry heaving into a paper bag just like they said he was in the trial. How's he going to master mind anything when he's dry heaving all the time? The whole case was total BS.
We're on a side street and John's mother pulls up the directions on her phone. All of a sudden an under cover police car drives right in front of us and block us from moving forward. I raise my hands and point to his mother saying she's the one on the phone. I'm not touching the phone. I thought they were going to try and give me a ticket for using a cell phone while driving.
Then another cop cars blocks us from the rear and a sh*t load of cops get out. They look like their Gang Task Force. Then all of a sudden it dawns on me. Are you hear for them I ask. Why didn't you just talk to us at the courthouse before we left? You know we're on our way to pick up Ana's belongings at the prison. I'm wondering WTF is going on.
Turns out they were pulling a dirty trick without their lawyer's knowledge. After the judge found the RCMP guilty of entrapment, they ran over to the other courthouse in the DTES and filed an ex parte application without telling or serving their lawyers. It was a really slimy thing to do.
They have Ana on the sidewalk and she looks like she's going to start bawling. I yell out hang on sweetheart, we support you. Then one of the cops comes up to me and says do you support terrorists? No I don't I said. They aren't terrorists. Did you read the judge's decision? Then he starts mocking the judge and the judge's decision. I'm just shaking my head saying this is f*cked.
So we go over to the other courthouse in the DTES. We're in the courtroom. I'm sitting in the gallery with John's mother. Ana is in the court but they've taken her hijab off and she's just bowing her head in shame and I thought you b*stards. You don't take a Sikh's turban off and you don't take a Muslim's hijab off. The whole thing was completely unnecessary. They should have served their lawyer when we were in court. They didn't do that because they wanted to go in front of another judge who hadn't heard the case so they could lie to them and be believed.
They were eventually released again and I remember waiting outside the DTES courthouse with the media scrum. One of the cameramen from the CBC point to the top of the building and says that's a stingray antenna. I look up and see the antenna and ask what is that? He just looks at me and I realize what it was and said oh.... That is what the police use for warrantless surveillance of any and all cell phone service in that area.
The police in Toronto denied using them but the Toronto Star did a freedom of information act request and found documentation proving the police lied and were using them for warrantless surveillance of all pubic cell phones. Since then they started putting them up all over Surrey with surveillance cameras. They have one outside my house. Those aren't traffic cameras they're surveillance cameras. When I posted that on my blog someone said that's not a stingray antenna that's a yagi antenna. Then I was like WTF do you think that yagi antenna is connected to?
Mountie who shot lover guilty of manslaughter
In December the Delta Optimist reported that "A former Saskatchewan Mountie told his murder trial his life was in turmoil and he was having sex with the man he's accused of killing, but he doesn't remember firing his gun. The trial has heard Braden Herman’s naked body was found in a park on the outskirts of Prince Albert, Sask. He had been shot in the chest."
In Decemebr the CBC reported that "A police officer testified Monday on the first day of the first-degree murder trial of a former Saskatchewan Mountie that Bernie Herman texted his wife saying he had shot a man on the night he was arrested. That evening, Bernie Herman's wife and daughter arrived at Wittal's house. They showed Wittal a text message allegedly from Bernie Herman. Wittal told court the text said: I shot Braden. It's over and done with." His wife? Wow.
Conor D'Monte is next on the Rat Pack's list
Blaze was part of the rat pack that lied about Cory Vallee in court. In that trial the defense lawyer said "the linchpin witnesses, who can be identified only as A, B, C and D due to a sweeping publication ban, escaped punishment for murders and got other perks by co-operating with the Crown. They did not just get money. They received a small fortune.”
In that trial the defense lawyer also said "a key Crown witness made up a confession from his client in order to get a deal from police." The lawyer then cited some details of what the witness claimed to police that Vallee told him about the LeClair hit that did not line up with other evidence called earlier in the trial. Blaze was never a member of the UN. The Bobsy Twins were but he wasn't. Blaze was convicted of selling crystal meth for the Hells Angels but never served that sentence. Now Blaze and Jamie Bacon are trashing the club because that's the way they roll.
Back to the Kevin LeClair murder. The only real witness saw two shooters. Both were wearing balaclavas but one was noticeably larger than the other. That was K-9. If that guy was wearing a balaclava you'd still be able to recognize him. K-9 was huge. He was a power lifter and a professional wrestler. Cory Vallee and Conor Conor D'Monte are the same size.
One of the shooters was K-9 and he's dead. It's possible Cory or Conner were the second shooter but it is not possible they both were. The Crown already convicted Cory so if Cory was one, Conor was not the other. It's pretty obvious to people who live here.
The Rat Pack can lie to the Five Eyes Alliance and fool Australia but they can't fool us who live here. James Riach is not working for the UN. That is a lie and that lie will come to light. Word.
Wednesday, January 24, 2024
Tucker Carlson Interviews Canadian Trucker
The Tucker Carlson Encounter: Freedom Convoy, the Coutts Four, and Liberating Canada
There was also a grandmother charged in the Coutts protest but her charges were dropped when she produced an audio recording of the police admitting to planting firearms on her property when they searched her home. The Five Eyes Alliance targeted a Canadian blogger for his opinion.
Tucker Carlson coming to Alberta January 24th
Tucker Carlson brings the Fragrance of Freedom to Canada
Danielle Smith speaks with Tucker Carlson
Fatal Shooting in Burnaby - Update
Speaking of dead ends, CTV is reporting that "One man is dead following a shooting in Burnaby, B.C., late Tuesday night. RCMP say they responded to reports of gunshots in the area of Kingsway and Denbigh Avenue at around 10:30 p.m. When police arrived, officers found a man suffering from serious gunshot wounds. According to the report, police and first responders attempted life-saving measures but the man later died on scene. A blue luxury SUV was taken away from the scene with around eight gunshot holes in the driver's side window."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)