Sunday, December 10, 2023

Israel Knew Hamas’s Attack Plan More Than a Year Ago

The New York Times is reporting that "Israeli officials obtained Hamas’s battle plan for the Oct. 7 terrorist attack more than a year before it happened, documents, emails and interviews show. But Israeli military and intelligence officials dismissed the plan as aspirational, considering it too difficult for Hamas to carry out." OK so this is a recent article from the New York Times. This is what they admit and this is how they are spinning or rationalizing it.

They have a document along with several interviews stating Israel knew about the attack a year before it happened. Then they spin that fact by claiming Israel didn't think it was realistic.

Knowing that the IDF is one of the most highly trained military forces in the world and that the Gaza border is one of the most highly monitored borders in the world that is under constant surveillance, for all practice purposes, that plan was indeed ridiculous. Under the current conditions, it could not happen. Two things had to change to make it possible.

We've heard testimony from former IDF solders who served on the Gaza border declare that a pigeon or a stork can't approach that border crossing without triggering alarms. So that means if this plan was to succeed, Benny Yahoo would have to take all the IDF soldiers monitoring the border and move them somewhere else. That is exactly what he did. So this new document puts that treasonous act into perspective. He knew about the plan a year before hand and he helped make it possible when we all know without his help it would not have been possible.

That's just getting in. We also saw what arguably looked like Caucasian Backwater operatives blow up the border fence to let the Hamas operatives in. In fact, the guy in front on one of the trucks they let in sure looks like a white guy to me. Only the New York Times article claims that was an Israeli military vehicle seized by Hamas led gunmen.

It kind of looks like they were led by a Caucasian Blackwater operative to me not Hamas but that's besides the point. The point is the Fake News spin article claims these Hamas led gunmen were riding on an Israeli military vehicle they had seized after crossing the border and entering Israel. Oh really? Just how are they going to seize an Israeli military vehicle from the IDF without alerting the IDF to their presence. The Fake News lie doesn't make sense which brings up the second impossibility in the year old plot. There's no way they could make it across the border without Benny Yahoo's help and there's no way they could make it in and out with hostages unless Benny Yahoo gave the IDF a stand down order which he did.

So this new document puts the IDF stand down order into new perspective. The New York Times is spinning the document claiming that Israel didn't take it seriously because the plan was not feasible. However, the presence of the document reveals the truth. Taking all the IDF soldiers monitoring the Gaza border off that assignment knowing Hamas was planning just such an attack wasn't an accident or an innocent act of negligence. It was a predetermined malicious act of criminal culpability. So was the IDF stand down order.

The New York Times rationalizations convict Benjamin Netanyahu. In fact the corruption trial against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has recenly resumed. Imagine that.

There's another thing. The New York Times article states that "The approximately 40-page document, which the Israeli authorities code-named 'Jericho Wall,' outlined, point by point, exactly the kind of devastating invasion that led to the deaths of about 1,200 people."

That's a very interesting name for an operation. I own a Jericho and a Masada. They are Israeli service pistols. The Jericho is named after the city that was protected by the Walls of Jericho that fell and the Masada is named after the legendary fortress beside the Dead Sea which I climbed when I was young. Hamas would not name one of their operations the Walls of Jericho. The New York Times admits that was the name Israel gave the operation.

Again, that is a very interesting choice of names. Jericho was a walled city Israel conquered. There is a popular legend about how the walls protecting the city fell and let the Israeli army in to conquer the city. To name the Hamas attack the Walls of Jericho reveals the true agenda behind it. The Hamas plan as outlined in the new document Israel received a year ago was simply not feasible. They couldn't get across the border and they couldn't get in and out without IDF resistance. They had to have help which Benny Yahoo gave them. However, even with that help, we all know what the outcome would be. We all know Israel would provide a colossal response.

So from a Hamas position, this suicide mission wasn't a plan to bring down the walls of Jericho and let Hamas conquer Israel. It was an excuse for Israel to invade Gaza and conquer it. That's why they named it the Walls of Jericho. This was not a Hamas operation. This was a Mossad operation given to them by the CIA who use false flag attacks as a pretext for war just like they tried with the USS Liberty. I'd like to give a shout out to Dan Dicks who found this recent article in the New York Times and pointed out that their breaking news two months after the Hamas attack was something he had already reported two days after the attack. Cheers.


  1. This info is confusing for me. Do I get this right? Israel’s knowledge of this Hamas invasion was to ‘assist’ It’s execution (by clearing out the boarder patrols) and to rally support from the masses to initiate a war? Thats put very simply, but am I on the right path?

    1. Ah Yeah but they did far more than just let it happen.

  2. Give Peace A Chance!!!


Comments are moderated so there will be a delay before they appear on the blog.