Sunday, November 12, 2023

The Ben Gurion Canal Project

Well, well, well... evidently stealing Gaza's natural gas isn't the only motive for the invasion and land grab. They want to build a canal as well from the Red sea to the Mediterranean as an alternate to the Suez canal. This is corporate Communism. Babies are dying in Gaza because the incubators in the hospitals have no electricity. Hospitals still have no food or power. The Canadian Red Cross states that "The instructions issued by the Israeli authorities for the population of Gaza City to immediately leave their homes, coupled with the complete siege explicitly denying them food, water, and electricity, are not compatible with International Humanitarian Law."

Tanks and bulldozers are destroying everything in their path. The Ben Gurion Canal Project is very real. The Middle East Monitor is reporting that "According to an Israeli public opinion poll conducted for Israel’s Maariv newspaper, only 27 per cent of Israelis believe that Benjamin Netanyahu is best suited for the position of prime minister." Efrat Fenigson is reporting on the civil liberties Benjamin Netanyahu is removing from Israeli citizens under the guise of war. This is what happens when you let a Globalist tied to the World Economic Forum destroy your freedom. Benny Yahoo wants to make everyone slaves - Jews and Palestinians.

9 comments:

  1. Follow the money. Always.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is like a Bond movie, what a coincidence that Klaus Schwab of the WEF actually looks like Dr. Evil, accent and everything.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You might be right about this, having an alternative canal to the Suez removes control from a Muslim nation of trans shipment through the area. The Egyptians make a lot of money from this too, Google Suez Canal passage fee's. It feels like part of a bigger plan though, you know?

    ReplyDelete
  4. When the general public is able to calculate/interpret multiple, consecutive and coinciding agendas playing out in real time they will be able to get a handle on how globalists operate.

    They never do a linear A to B operation. At this present time we could list at least a half dozen "hidden" goals of what they are trying to accomplish.
    People often get caught up in the rhetoric of it being a single agenda at play while this provides cover for the other 8 simultaneously on going.
    When one is able to put the totality of their goals into perspective the unprecedented level of evil in the globalist's intentions is finally able to be seen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a very good point. Take Afghanistan for an example. One of the main issues in Afghanistan was the Central Asia Pipeline. Shortly before 9/11 the Texas oil barons were wining and dining the Taliban trying to win the contract for the pipeline. As soon as the Taliban awarded the contract to an Argentina firm names Bridas their country was invaded and that decision was reversed.

      However, opium was another reason they were invaded. Before the invasion, the Taliban had brought opium production in Afghanistan to a grinding halt. After the invasion Afghanistan once again became the world's largest producer of Opium.

      That's another reason for the invasion. Then there was the asbestos in the WTC.

      Delete
  5. Or the $2.3 trillion missing that was announced by Rumsfeld on September 10th, 2001.....or the Silverstein WTC double indemnity terrorist attack insurance policy...or Cheney aka Haliburton and cohorts meeting in Iraq a year before the invasion bidding on rebuilding contracts...the evidence is always there to see their agenda.
    It is always multi faceted and planned well in advance.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd forgotten about Haliburton. Rumsfeld's statement about all that money missing from the Pentagon's budget is indeed organized crime. The invasion of Iraq was predominantly for the oil but as you say there were war profiteers waiting in line for a piece of the pie.

      Many American's think Iraq was invaded because of 9/11. That is not true. Afghanistan was invaded because of 9/11. Iraq was invaded because of WMD. Bush said Iraq had WMD but they didn't. Then after the invasion he said mission accomplished. Dr David Kelly, the British weapons inspector blew the whistle and said that claim was a lie. He later died of a suspicious suicide.

      Which reinforces the fact that globalists infiltrate the right as well as the left. They claim Benny Yahoo is right wing but he's not. He's a globalist just like the rest of them. That means he's a Corporate Communist who supports the WEF's twisted brand of Communism.

      Delete
  6. Very thought provoking

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 but it was a feeding frenzy media at the time.
    "You are either with us or the evil doers"
    This was all carefully presented by the media at the time to lump it altogether.
    The WMD story was a dud before it even got started but they continued the push to have some sort of a reason for the invasion.
    Sure oil was the primary goal, but construction contracts were in the 10's of billions. Same with the logistical contracts, security contracts and of course the weapons and munitions contracts.
    Also worth noting is Saddam was starting to settle oil contracts in different currencies other than the US Petrol dollar, that got the attention of the PTB as well.

    War is a racket.
    It always has been.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated so there will be a delay before they appear on the blog.