Sunday, November 19, 2023

Palestinian Authority claims Israel, not Hamas, committed Re'im massacre

The Jerusalem Post is reporitng that "The Palestinian Authority's Finance Ministry put out a statement on Sunday, denying terror group Hamas was responsible for at least 350 partygoers slain at the Re'im music festival massacre. The statement says that preliminary Israeli police investigations showed that Israeli claims in the media were false, followed up by saying that this was then used by the occupation to justify its aggression against Gaza."

US says Palestinians should govern Gaza after war

Reuters is reporting that " Palestinians should govern Gaza once Israel ends its war against Hamas, the United States said on Wednesday, pushing back against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's idea that Israel would be responsible for security indefinitely."

I agree. Gaza neds local represenation. Hamas shoud be replaced by Fatah not Israel.

7 comments:

  1. It was originally reported by Haaretz, an Israeli media station. Their story was an Israeli police helicopter was responsible for atleast some of the deaths at the music festival

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've been hearing some conflicting information in their changing narrative. First we heard the Hamas operatives got in and out with zero resistance. Then we hear an IDF helicopter opened fire on Hamas operatives during the attack and started shooting civilians while it was shooting at Hamas operatives only that doesn't make sense. If one IDF helicopter engaged the operatives during the attack that would have notified all of them and they would not have been able to make it out with all those hostages. It sounds like they were caught shooting civilians and they claimed they were shooting at Hamas as an after thought to rationalize why they were shooting civilians.

      Delete
    2. The whole thing wreaks of conspiracy. There’s no way Hamas would of made that plan and expected it to be successful. Unless they knew there would be a stand down order or it was never them in the first place. I 0% trust the narrative

      Delete
    3. Yeah, it doesn't make sense. Why would they start a war they knew they could not win right after they agreed to share profits from natural gas drilling? They wouldn't.

      Delete
    4. And now they agree to release the hostages in exchange for a ceasefire!?
      Why would they even take hostages that would cause an incursion. Just to release them in order to stop the counter attack!?!?
      Doesn’t make a lick of sense

      Delete
  2. Word on the street your pal is out if the club

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can't comment on that but I will say, check the word on the street yo.

      Delete

Comments are moderated so there will be a delay before they appear on the blog.