Saturday, June 29, 2024

Tommy Robinson and Islamic Extreemism

A controversial anti Islamist from England is making the news in Canada and I think Ezra Levant has lost his mind and his soul. Tommy Robinson is anti mass migration but he is also anti any and all Islamic migration. He wants to stop all Muslims from immigrating and he wants to stop building mosques. What about churches? Are churches OK? Which ones? Are Catholic churches OK or does he just want Protestant churches? This is where I separate myself from everyone.

I do not support Tommy Robinson. I support civl liberty. Hate is too great a burdon to bear.

This brings us back to the circle. Draw a line in the sand and call that democracy. The further you get away from that line to the left or the right the further away from democracy you get and the closer you get to Dictatorship. I am what the Irish call a republican. That means I support a free republic. Even that is slightly different than a complete democracy.

For example, a free Republic guarantees the rights of the minorities. If the majority of the citizens say gas all the Jews or kill all the Muslims, the constitution forbids that because it protects civil liberty by law. If the majority of the citizens say seize all the land and assets of the rich, the constitution would forbid that because property rights are protected by law.

We have all seen how fly by night snake oil salesmen use manufactured emergencies to justify doing away with civil liberty. Not on my watch. The freedom of religion means the freedom of religion. If you want to oppose the mass migration of criminals, then by all means, I support that. We need criminal record checks. We cannot accept shiploads of criminals into our country to rob us blind. We see the WEF's problem, reaction, solution paradigm when it comes to mass migration. They are intentionally creating a problem to justify their insane solution.

These snake oil salesmen, just like the CIA, will telly you nine truths to get you hooked on one lie. They are using this manufactured emergency to rally hate and division because that is exactly what the WEF wants so they can create order amidst the chaos. Their order.

Personally I wouldn't shout Free Palestine. That implies opposition to the Oslo accord which I support. Nor would I stand with Israel in committing a calculated genocide based on a false flag attack. Hitler used false flag attacks and we all saw how that went.

Personally I would say leave Palatine alone. Stop the genocide. That's not antisemitic because that's exactly what the Jews in Israel are saying. I'm really disappointed how Mossad has hijacked Rebel News and the Daily Wire. Let's ask them about Mossad's involvement in Operation Watch Tower throughout Iran contra. Let's ask them about the Investment fraud Mossad runs in Israel. Blind obedience to evil is evil. There's no rationalization for it.

Israel's leaders are not always right. They weren't right when they threw Jeremiah in prison. Look how that worked out for them. Good and evil exist in every nation and it behooves us to shun the evil as we support the good. There are a lot of good people in Israel who want an end to the war.

Now when we talk about Islamic extremism, I think we can all agree that none of us support that. ISIS was so extreme that all the Arab countries united to oppose it. Yet the CIA created ISIS and ISIS K. So we need to shun the CIA's extremism that defiantly endorses the WEF. Just for the record, the Palestinian Muslims get along with the Palestinian Christians just fine. The Palestinian Muslims aren't the ones blowing up ancient churches in Gaza, the IDF is. Muslims believe Jesus was a prophet and Mary, the mother of Jesus, was one of the most important women in scripture. My neighbors are Muslims. They named one of their children Jesus.
Hey Christian - who is your neighbour? Is it the Samaritan? Is it the Palestinian or is it the Muslim? The parable of the good Samaritan sets the standard as does the parable of the sheep and the goats. The people of Gaza are literally starving. "When ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not unto me. Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets. As ye sow, so shall ye reap."


  1. What about Ukrainians? Can they have their own culture without being destroyed by Russia? And let me guess, you don't publish this comment

    1. I'm going to publish it because you're a POS liar. Look at the demographics of Ukraine after the last real election. Donbas and the East are Russian. Zelensky's Nazis were bombing the Donbas and Putin went in to protect them and their culture.

  2. It's true that the population in those area's is majority ethnic Russian, at the same time it remains that Russia agreed to the borders as drawn by the former Soviet Union after the breakup in 1989 as a condition of getting all the nukes in Ukraine back, and the Ukrainians lived up to their side of the deal as far as we know, right? No one is saying otherwise anyway.

    Why where the Ukrainians bombing their own territory in the first place?

    1. AYFKM? They were bombing the Donbas because the Donbas objected to the CIA coup for f*ck sakes. The Russian majority elected a Russian president who didn't want to be part of the EU. The CIA led a coup and are bringing in new nukes. They are persuading the Ukraine to join NATO and want to put nukes on Russia's border. Kind of like the Cuban missile crisis. This manufactured conflict could have easily been avoided. No coup, no NATO and no new nukes. Zelensky's Nazis also want to cleanse the Ukraine of all citizens who are of Russian ethnicity.

    2. Ah, OK got it. Boy if they find nukes of US manufacture would sort of explain why Putin hasn't been more aggressive though I guess. The joining NATO thing, yeah the Ukrainians would love that. It pretty much leads to another European land war beyond Russia and the Ukraine.

    3. It's not a matter of "if" they find US nukes in the Ukraine. That's the undisputed plan. That's what them joining NATO means. That' what Putin's concern was from day one. Putin hasn't been more aggressive because he said he doesn't want more territory. He wants to protect the Russian speaking Ukrainians and he doesn't want nukes on his border. This manufactured conflict could have easily been avoided and can easily be resolved. Contrary to the fake news and the lying left.


Comments are moderated so there will be a delay before they appear on the blog.