Saturday, June 3, 2023
Justin Trudeau left teaching mid term
Justin Trudeau is absolutely delusional. Rebel News has a clip from the House of Commons where Pierre Poilievre confronts Justin for leaving his Drama teacher job mid term. Rebel News pointed out that it was unusual that a teacher would leave mid term. What's even more unusual was that he brought a lawyer with him to that resignation. Things that make ya go hmm... He certainly wasn't a math teacher because his inability to do math math is literally bankrupting the nation. Maybe we should teach more math in school and less sex ed.
There an interesting document floating around and I'm trying to find it to match the date.
MALCOLM: Trudeau's yearbook tells a bigger story
When you look at the rest of Justin Trudeau's Drama teacher yearbook it becomes clear that Justin Trudeau didn't recently become a flaming idiot. He always was one.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Too funny. I saw this yesterday and replayed it a few times for a good chuckle. You know, ya gotta love Pierre, just when we’re all so in the dumps over the state this country, he never fails to give me a smile with shades of hope. Step aside Singh, we need to make Canada great again!
ReplyDeleteI bet black face failed math…. Anyone?
ReplyDeleteBlack Face said "The budget will balance itself."
DeleteI'm a gambling man, so if he didn't fail math, I'll bet he cheated.
he brought a lawyer with him when he resigned,Hmmmmm,he had something to lose
ReplyDeleteWould he ever have been PM if people had known about that? This is the reason not to keep these kinds of secrets.
DeleteThe Turd had a forbidden relationship while at WPGA.
ReplyDelete"They" have used this little point of fact to get this POS
to destroy this country.
In his delusional psychopathic spell he assumes the truth will never come out.
I don't think is was one inappropriate relationship at West Point Grey Academy, it was many. I need someone to resend me a copy of that disciplinary document with the name of the victim and the offender blacked out. I want to compare the dates on it.
DeleteWhat year was this?
DeleteHow has he stayed “straight” for so long ?
ReplyDeleteAre you joking? Take a look at his mannerisms.
DeleteUh oh. In other words, the inappropriate relationship wasn't with a female? No wonder he's WEF, they freaking own that guy. Never mind the parentage issue, they probably have proof on that one.
DeleteI think back then at the school he had many inappropriate relationships with young girls. Everything he did in the yearbook photographs was inappropriate. It's just that his mannerisms now scream AC/DC.
DeleteApparently he got caught at at the girl's house by the father. The girl got $2.25M to never talk about it. "The two engaged in a long and steamy affair on- and off-campus". This was published in 2019.
ReplyDeletehttps://buffalochronicle.com/2019/10/19/trudeaus-west-grey-accusor-was-much-younger-than-first-thought/
Thanks for the link. Wow. Published in 2019 and no one cares. Sad.
DeleteIt's American media. He was PM by then and no Canadian media would touch it. Even so, if it wasn't true then it's defamation and he has his lawyer send a cease and desist letter. He did not do that. He did the smart thing. Nothing.
DeleteThe student in question is probably in that montage pic, it's a pretty clever way of getting that info out there in a way where they don't actually print her name in the article. Basically she's one of the 9 up there, and I think we can nail it down, if I can put it that way, to 1 of 3, maybe 4. Many who went to WPGA then would know.
Naming her does not matter. We should respect the publication ban to protect her. Siting her father is good enough.
DeleteAgreed, naming her does not matter, but there is no publication ban, it's a voluntary settlement agreement between both sides where she has to pay penalties if she breaks the non-disclosure aspects of it. She's free to write a book anytime she wants, if she wants. Her not being named in that article was the Americans protecting her.
DeleteIf there's a nondisclosure agreement, then she can't write a book. Even though there's no publication ban I rather not name her out of respect. That article sates enough. The father claims his daughter was much younger than 17. It wasn't considered illegal because age of consent at that time was 14 but it is pretty messed up.
DeleteApathy at it's absolute worst.
ReplyDeleteHe's a psychopathic tyrant.
This POS is the absolute worst specimen to ever represent this country.
Does $2.25 million sound high, even if it was back in 2002, for whatever this situation was? Except that he was in a position of responsibility and should have been criminally charged on that basis, not her age. There is another article by the American newspaper linked above in which it sounds like this $2.25 was only settled on in 2019, not back in 2021, which I did not find clear in the first one.
ReplyDeleteThis really changes things. It mentions a small settlement "at the time", implying that the $2.25M was more recent. If so, why? As in, why now?
There's a rumour that it's a little more complicated than a 20+ years old scandal that was suppressed. A settlement in 2019 seems to support that. The rumour is that our illustrious PM got the girl pregnant. The kid would be about 22 years old now, 4 years ago in 2019 would have been 18. A year later in 2003 he's "reconnecting" with his now wife and by 2005, married and theoretically respectable.
I have no idea about a pregnancy but the father said his daughter was younger than 17. The age of consent at the time was 14.
Delete