Global is reporting that "It’s been six years since a man disguised as an RCMP officer began a shooting rampage in ruralNova Scotia, killing 22 people including a teenager and a pregnant woman."
"The worst mass shooting in modern Canadian history began after denture-maker Gabriel Wortman assaulted his common-law partner in Portapique, N.S., before fatally shooting neighbours, strangers and an RCMP officer."
Used to launch a Liberal gun ban knowing full well that none of the firearms Gabe Wortman had were legally obtained.
When the RCMP showed a large deposit into Gabe Wortman's bank account, they tried to claim he was tied to organized crime. Then Macleans said wait a minute. That's the same way police agents get paid. The RCMP were the ones that deposited that money into his bank account.
The Nova Scotia RCMP deflected and said he didn't work for us. Then Paul Palango found the Paper trail. Gabe Wortman didn't work for the Nova Scotia RCMP he worked for the New Brunswick RCMP. The Nova Scotia RCMP lied because the RCMP is a federal police force not a Provincial police force.
That means the New Brunswick RCMP were the ones that supplied Gabe Wortman with the firearms used in Canada's largest mass shooting. Mentioning the mass shooting without mentioning that fat is criminally culpable.
"Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston announced that flags would be lowered to half-mast at all provincial government buildings this weekend."
Tim Houston, the Neo Con that banned hiking in the forest during summer. As I said, Neo Cons use false flag attacks to justify taking away civil liberty and this case is a prime example. Gabe Wortman didn't kill Corry Ellison. The RCMP lied and falsified that evidence.
Peter Griffon was also a police agent from that fake cartel bust in Edmonton. He was also tied to Gabe Wortman and gave ho the police decals for his car everyone knew he had. Three police agents directly involved with the biggest mass shooting in Canada in history.
CTV is Reporting that "Two RCMP officers who mistakenly opened fire at a man outside a rural Nova Scotia firehall as they searched for a rampaging gunman said Thursday they believed they had found the shooter and defended their actions as consistent with their training.
Const. Terry Brown and Const. Dave Melanson made the assertion as they testified before the commission of inquiry into the mass shootings that claimed 22 lives over a 13-hour period on April 18-19, 2020."
Talk about Fake News. That is obscene. This was a fire hall where the police took survivors to protect them. The police knew this facility was being protected by the real police. Their shots went through the garage doors into the hall where the civilians were. If you are shooting at a suspect, you know what's behind the target. That's not one or two stray rounds.
There is no way they thought they were shooting at Gabe Wortman. It was a marked car out front protecting a known safe house. If they had any doubt whatsoever about the police car all they had to do was radio in and say hey is that one of us? That's all they had to do. Their story fails the test of believably.
These two officers are lying because the Nova Scotia mass shooting was a false flag. Every crime has a motive. Gun control is the only motive in this crime. The money he received from the RCMP makes them the prime suspects.
There was a rural shooting in Nova Scotia and there is something very shady going on about the way it is being portrayed in the mainstream media. I'll wait for more facts to come forward before I comment. The RCMP will hold a news conference at 6 p.m. AT Sunday.
The New York Times is reporting that "A police officer and a 51-year-old gunman were dead after a shooting rampage in Nova Scotia in which multiple people were killed, the authorities and a police union president said Sunday." Something very fishy is going on here.
Is the shooter dead or in custody? Which is it. The Albertan that shot that cop in Abbotford after stealing a mustang looked shady. Gabriel Wortman does not. No one knows what goes on behind closed doors but something about this just doesn't sit right.
"Police first reported the incident Saturday night just after 11:30 p.m., saying they’d responded to a firearms complaint in the area of Portapique Beach Road, Bay Shore Road and Five Houses Road. Just after 8 a.m., they were advising residents to remain on lockdown and stay away from the area bordered by those three roads and the No. 2 Hwy."
I find that VERY hard to believe. Every crime has a motive. Dead men tell no tales.
“It’s absolutely unbelievable this could happen in our community." Indeed it is.
Update: And now the true motive finally emerges:
Go F*ck Yourself. Justin Trudeau is an anti Christ. Take your gun control along with your UN led Communism and cram it up your a*s. You shame your father by trampling the civil liberty he gave us. Gabriel Wortman did NOT kill 23 people. That is a lie. Someone else did. God damn you all.
"Drawing on thousands of pages of commission documents, interviews, and forensic evidence, Palango builds a compelling case that the RCMP’s handling of the tragedy was not just flawed but potentially compromised. He explores the possibility that Wortman may have had ties to law enforcement or was acting as a police agent—an explosive theory that the commission largely sidestepped. The book doesn’t just ask hard questions—it demands accountability."
Paul Palango's new book definitely opens Pandora's box but his conclusions are completely different from my conclusions. He cites a whole list of abnormalities and falsified evidence then basically says nothing to see here folks. The RCMP suck and need to be disbanded. That's all there is but is it really?
When investigating a crime we need to examine means and motive. We consider alternate theories. If we refuse to admit 9/11 was an inside job and we refuse to examine orchestrated events, then we pretty much miss the whole point of a real investigation. Is it simply a whitewash? I didn't think so but if we refuse to examine the obvious it starts to look that way.
The mainstream media is worthless. Trying to win them over is pointless. There are a lot of people in Nova Scotia that question the official narrative. It doesn't make sense. All the abnormalities and falsified evidence point to something else.
One X account about the Nova Scotia Mass murders talks about the missing yellow stripe on Gabe Wortman's RCMP uniform. In the surveillance video there is no yellow stripe on Gabe Wortman's pants but on an altered screen shot there is. Why would someone alter that?
Another posts asks who thinks the Democrats would stage a mass shooting and kill innocent people to justify gun control? I do and evidently I'm not the only one but it's not just Democrats. It's fake Republicans as well. 9/11 happened on George Bush's watch. Globalists on the right use false flag attacks to justify taking away civil liberty.
Gabe Wortman was a paid police informant. We assume that was for a FBI cross border gun smuggling sting. We don't actually think he was paid to execute the mass shooting but the long list of abnormalities means we aren't so sure.
Paul Polango asks if this was simply a case of domestic violence, why falsify evidence? Yet this wasn't a case of a police agent losing his mind either. It's clearly something far more sinister. Paul Polango points out that Wortman's common law spouse had a lot more disposable income than she reported on her taxes. If she was a police agent, then we can throw out her entire testimony.
Everyone knows her dramatic claims of spending the night in the woods after her escape was fabricated. Yet if she was a police agent then so were the claims of domestic violence. Wortman was a swinger. They were in an open relationship. He certainly wasn't a jealous, controlling ex. So why lie?
The fact that Gabe Wortman was a police agent is a big deal. The fact that his neighbor Peter Griffon and his common law spouse Lisa Banfield were police agents is a big deal. The fact that two undercover tactile RCMP officers were caught shooting up a fire hall where civilians were being staged is a big deal.
They shot through the roll up doors, the weakest point of the building. What if they weren't caught and they hit a civilian inside? Would they also add that to the list of people Gabe Wortman killed like they did for Corey Ellison?
Wortman's ties to the police and to the Hells Angels are a big deal. At this point considering the possibility of the mass murder being an orchestrated event isn't crazy. Refusing to consider that possibility is. We know no one is going to investigate this.
It's like the Pickton case. It's dead in the water. That doesn't mean we have to believe the BS and be swayed by it. Gun control has an agenda. Reducing violent crime is not part of it.
The RCMP didn't want to let Lisa Banfield testify at the public Inquiry because they didn't want to encourage conspiracy theories. Yet the fact that Gabe Wortman was a police agent already has. They cited Alex Jones who claimed Sandy Hook never happened. I'm not Alex Jones.
No one is saying the Nova Scotia murders never happened. That's like saying 9/11 never happened. Just because they were orchestrated events doesn't mean they never happened.
It's shocking to think the Intelligence community would kill innocent people just to push an agenda. Yet when you list the abnormalities it's hard to see any other possibility. Gun control is the only motive. He wasn't a jealous ex. He had no motive to kill those people other than being a police agent.
It's like the Surrey Pressure cooker fraud case. Without the RCMP, the two marks didn't have the means or motive to commit that crime. CSIS provided the explosives for the Air India bombing. If they hadn't done that the suspects they groomed would not have had the means to commit that crime.
In the Nova Scotia Mass murders, the police agent would not have had the means to commit that crime if the RCMP hadn't given him the illegal guns he used. Gabe Wortman acquired the illegal guns while running a joint FBI op in Maine across the New Brunswick border. The RCMP were a part of it.
This is yet another Nova Scotia Mass Murder anomaly that I haven't completely figured out yet. One of the 22 victims, Aaron Tuck, was a Hells Angels Associate. I am told he was a member of the Red Devils.
Aaron was from Nova Scotia but moved to Calgary where he met his wife and had a daughter. They moved to Portapique on a family home. He was murdered along with his wife and daughter. When you look at the pictures of everyone murdered in that horrific event it breaks your heart. These are real people with families and lives. Murder is always a horrible tragedy.
It's possible the Mountain Men became Red Devils. This is relevant because locals in Nova Scotia claim that approximately 2 hours before 10pm there were multiple sightings of MC Bikers on ATVs, dirt bikes & SXS's coming down from the clubhouse into the Portapique area, tearing up lawns & setting fires near Griffon's home on Faris Lane in Portapique.
That would explain why the RCMP lied and falsified evidence. Yet there is another possibility as well that wouldn't explain why the RCMP lied and falsified evidence.
Paul Palango doesn't refer to the Nova Scotia Mass Murders as the mass shooting singular. He refers to them as the mass shootings plural because there were really two separate time lines. One that happened in Portapique specifically and the other that happened all over the place.
The Portapique murders were separate from the others. Since locals saw bikers on ATV's setting fires and tearing the place up they think those murders were committed by bikers not Gabe Wortman. That is also one possibility.
If Aaron Tuck was a Hells Angels associate, why would Hells Angels associates kill him? Who knows. Often when a puppet club patches over, people are killed or left behind. It's a political move by an aspiring leader.
Aaron tuck wasn't huge but he was lean and fit. He had MMA experience. The corner's report claimed that Aaron Tuck was beaten to a pulp before he was shot dead. That wasn't Gabe Wortman's MO. Aaron could have beaten Gabe in a fight. So who beat Aaron Tuck up? Gabe Wortan didn't.
It is possible Bikers did the murders in Portapique and it was made to look like Gabe Wortman did those. That is one theory. The fact is, Gabe Wortman didn't kill Corrie Ellison. The RCMP lied and falsified evidence to cover that fact up.
Clinton Jaws is retired rank and file RCMP. I am not. I have a different perspective but I share some of his concerns and respect his opinion.
I support Police on Guard because I share their values.
I believe in the the Rule of Law. The Canadian Charter of Rights is the law. When we fail to uphold that charter we fail to uphold the law. Law enforcement promotes peace and prosperity.
Clinton Jaws' thoughtful concerns have opened up the door for a reflective conversation about several issues.
In this video he discusses his opinion about some of the statements the RCMP Commissioner has made. I do share some of those concerns because they reflect an Agenda that is not in harmony with upholding law and order.
In the video Clinton Jaws mentions two things - the systemic racism quest and the Nova Scotia Mass shooting. He and I are going to have a different opinion about the Nova Scotia mass shooting yet we share the same concerns about the obsession with systemic misrepresentation.
Clinton Jaws would never entertain the posability of the Nova Scotia mass shooting being a false flag. If he did he would be demonetized and kicked off YouTube. Just like how many New Yorkers would never entertain the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job. The ramifications of that theory are too much for them to bear.
I do not support ANTIFA or lawlessness. Previously I explained the motive behind the Anarchist Communist alliance during the ANTIFA riots. Anarchists want there to be no control while the Communists want complete control. The Communists are using the Anarchists to attain their Agenda. They promote the Anarchists to create complete lawlessness and disorder so they can come in and create order amidst the chaos. Their order.
This is why I oppose the Defund the Police movement. That movement is part of the same Agenda. Defund the police so crime gets out of control then bring in your own police to secure complete control. Star Wars 101.
One more thing. Clinton Jaws says the Media is not your friend and that the CBC is the worst. He's absolutely right. When Tara Henley resigned from the CBC she said it was because of the CBC's woke leftist agenda. Unfortunately, except for Rebel News, the True North and Counter Signal, all the other mainstream media outlets in Canada are now just as bad as the CBC. They are all the same. They don't report the news, they promote an Agenda.
The transformation of the Vancouver Sun since it was bought out by Post Media News has become obvious. As we speak, they are actively resurrecting the Omicron Con.
One one hand they are still passionately promoting the corruption within IHIT and the CFSEU that ultimately opposes law and order. On the other hand they are starting to throw out articles just like the CBC about fake police misconduct trying to make the rank and file officer look bad in support of the Agenda the mainstream media coalition has embraced.
The Vancouver Sun opposed Doug McCallum's candidacy for mayor of Surrey because he was a physically responsible Conservative who supports law and order. That is in direct opposition to Post Media News' platform. They support Dianne Watts' tax and spend Globalism.
Doug McCallum doesn't do interviews with the Vancouver Sun for that reason. They still continuously try to misrepresent him and promote the fringe tax and spend globalists that oppose him. Doug McCallum has in a sense taken Clinton Jaws advice. Doug McCallum doesn't give the Vancouver Sun the time of day because he knows they are not his friend and will misrepresent anything he says to them. Since Postmedia news bought the Vancouver Sun it has become worthless. It's not news it's propaganda just like the CBC.
Global is reporitng that "The RCMP’s near-blanket refusal to provide information about its investigation into the shooting spree that terrorized Nova Scotians in April of last year may be to blame for a series of leaks to a Halifax magazine, policing experts told Global News.
CBC is reporitng that "The public inquiry examining the circumstances of the Nova Scotia mass killing is calling for Frank Magazine to remove highly sensitive audio of 911 calls."
“What I found really weird was when they shot up the fire hall and nobody even talked to us for a year,” McLellan said.
McLellan is adamant the two RCMP officers who shot up the fire hall should be punished.
“I want to see those two fired because the SIRT report is full of crap,” she said.
"The recordings make it clear that 911 operators were told the gunman was driving a police vehicle when he went from house to house in Portapique killing his neighbours and lighting homes on fire." Most of the witness
simply
saw a man dressed as a police officer driving a police car shooting people. Locals are very concerned that fact was not released to the public as it is an important detail to reveal to protect innocent lives. He had a cop car but did he have a uniform?
Two of the callers identified the gunman, either by name or by indicating his profession. That is significant IF true. However, there are a lot of shady things going on in this case. Covering up the fact that the gunman was dressed as a cop driving a cop car is one of them. Makes it kind of easy for a Blackwater contractor to impersonate him.
False information can be leaked to the press just as easily as true information.
Earlier MacLean's stated that "The Nova Scotia shooter case has hallmarks of an undercover operation.
Police sources say the killer's withdrawal of $475,000 was highly irregular, and how an RCMP ‘agent’ would get money." Initially the RCMP were trying to portray the mild-mannered denturist as having ties to organized crime by claiming he had a huge sum of money deposited into his bank account. Turns out that money came from the RCMP.
"On December 5, 2024, the Government of Canada amended the Regulations Prescribing Certain Firearms and Other Weapons, Components and Parts of Weapons, Accessories, Cartridge Magazines, Ammunition and Projectiles as Prohibited or Restricted (commonly referred to as the Classification Regulations.) The amendments have the effect of reclassifying certain named firearms and their variants as prohibited."
Those bastards. Justin Trudeau is a POS. Mine aren't on the list but a few I wanted to buy are. Repeal that entire list!
The Toronto Sun is reporting that "Three-hundred and twenty-four unique firearm makes and models of so-called 'assault-style' firearms are now prohibited weapons in Canada, effective immediately. But with an amnesty period that ends 10 days after the latest possible date for the next federal election, there’s little expectation the new measures will ever come into effect."
The thing I want to point out is that this new list of banned guns was not voted on in parliament. They have magically added it retroactively to a bill that was voted on back in 2020.
When Justin the freak tried to add this wish list as an amended to that bill, rural NDP MPs freaked and said you've lost your mind as did the assembly of First Nation Chiefs. They threatened to vote down the entire bill because of that amendment. Now the POS adds it retroactively without a vote. That's not lawful. Especially when his minority government hangs by a thread and would fall if this came to a vote.
Now there are two other points I'd like to make. The first is the misrepresentation of the term assault riffle. Every semi automatic firearm is not an assault riffle. They use the term to intentionally sound scary. Most hunting rifles are semi automatic. This isn't the 1800's.
If you have a bear attacking you, you don't want a single action bolt action rifle. Rural Canadians live with predators. Bears, cougars and wolves are serious threats.
As we've seen in Stanley Park coyote attacks are a concern but wolves are even worse. In Tofino, wolves are at the top of the food chain. They'll rake out a black bear.
Wolves are bigger than coyotes and the hunt in a pack. If you're surrounded by a pack of hungry wolves, you don't want a single bolt action rifle. You want a semi automatic.
Justin Trudeau wants to ban all semi automatic rifles because he wants to ban all rifles. That is his Agenda. That is the WEF's Agenda and the UN's New World Order where Communism is rebranded as Globalism and civil liberty is banned.
That's what makes us concerned about these reoccurring bans. Commodus claims he wants to send these rifles to the Ukraine. That is ridiculous. Various different calibers of hunting rifles. He makes that claim to try and sound more palatable when it's not. It's a lie and we all know it.
No one who has any of those firearms is going to turn them in. They're going to wait for the next election as they should. The war in the Ukraine will be over by then. Justin Trudeau wants to prolong that war as does the Kamala Biden administration.
What if Canada was ever invaded? We see the war machine create manufactured conflicts around the world. Instead of diffusing the Ukraine conflict now that Donald Trump was elected, the war machine is intentionally trying to provoke conflict. So what if Russia or China invaded Canada? We would need these same rifles to defend ourselves. There is a reason Justin Trudeau doesn't want us to be able to defend ourselves.
Now for the elephant in the room. CTV reported that the May 2020 bill followed a deadly mass shooting in Portapique, N.S. earlier that year. OK so let's talk about that.
I'm not saying it never happened. It most certainly did happen just like the vicious attack on the USS Liberty happened. I'm saying it was orchestrated. Steven Seagal said he believes many of these mass shootings are orchestrated. So do I.
The Orlando shooting was orchestrated. There was far too many rounds fired for one person. There was more than one person involved and the Gay Muslim they shot wasn't one of them. The purpose of that orchestrated event was to ban AR 15's in the US in support of the WEF's Agenda.
Likewise gun control was the motive behind the Nova Scotia mass shooting. No one saw Gabe shoot anyone. People saw someone dressed in a RCMP officer uniform driving a RCMP car shoot people. That was strange.
Even worse two under cover RCMP officers were caught shooting up a fire hall filled with civilians during the lock down. They claimed they were shooting at Gabe. That was a lie.
They riddle the garage doors, the weakest part of the building with bullets. The RCMP tried to claim Gabe had ties to organized crime. To prove it they showed a large sum of money deposited into his bank account. The problem with that lie was the fact that the RCMP were the ones that deposited that money into his account. Gabe was working for the RCMP.
Which ties in with another anomaly. Remember that crazy Mexican cartel bust in Edmonton? One of the people arrested, originally from Nova Scotia was a police agent. After he was mysteriously released from prison early, he just was mysteriously gave Gabe the decals to put on his car to make it look identical to a RCMP cruiser. That shows another angle of how police agents' were tied to the Nova Scotia mass shooting.
I did look through the new list. As I said there are a few items on it I wanted to purchase since the amendment failed. The fact that the amendment came back without a vote needs to be challenged. Two of those firearms are made by Canadian companies that sell to the US. They are really good firearms. Once again Justin Trudeau strives to kill Canadian business and tank our economy to justify their insane Agenda.
All the firearms used in the mass shooting were provided by the RCMP. That makes it an orchestrated event. Paul is unable to entertain that thought which to me is highly suspicious and makes the whole investigation pointless. If we're not prepared to discuss the obvious then we're not even fooling ourselves.
Well here is the new info. At 7:46 in the video they introduce a local citizen investigator who has been scouring through the documents in the public inquiry. They reiterate how the inquiry has hidden any relevant information within a sea of useless documents which appear to be for the intent of discouraging people from examining them.
At 16.26 they mention a document which is a Const Shawn Stanton email thread. 1400 pages. Basically it confirms what we already new. Peter Griffon was a police agent.
The new email found buried in the Inquiry documents is from an RCMP officer who refers to Peter Griffon's handler. (25:41)
This is a screen shot of the email without the phone numbers.
So if Peter Griffon was a police agent and Peter Griffon provided Gabe Wortman with the RCMP decals for his car, then the RCMP were the ones that provided Gabe Wortman with the police decals as well as provided him the firearms used in the mass shooting. Gabe Wortman was a police agent in a cross border firearm and drug bust in the US. That's where all the firearms came from. From that undercover op.
I said Peter Griffon was a police agent from day one because that Alberta Cartel bust was fake and Peter Griffin was released from prison way too soon for him not to be a police agent. That's why when I heard he was involved with Gabe Wortman in the Nova Scotia Mass shooting I said orchestrated event.
Colion Noir recently did a review of the Desert Eagle and I think it's worth discussing. For most the Desert Eagle is the coveted addition to any gun collection. Yet he talks about why he hates that gun after finally firing it.
He said the recoil was very unpleasant. Obviously the Desert Eagle initially came in two sizes .357 and .44 magnum. The .50 cal was an afterthought and that seems to be what everyone obsesses over. I've never shot a .50 cal and I have no desire to do so. For me .22 is too small and .50 cal is too big. I like anything and everything in between.
It turns out Colion got a .50 cal. No wonder it has massive recoil. I read somewhere that a .50 cal has 38% more recoil than a .44 which is significant. For me that would be like the difference between firing a .44 pistol and a 12 gauge shotgun with a pistol grip. I found the .44 fine but I found the the pistol grib on a 12 gauge shotgun very uncomfortable. I didn't like it. I mush prefer to shoulder a shotgun.
Colion showed a clip of him firing a .44 Ruger Red hawk and how much he liked it. My range buddy has one and I tried it. The first thing I noticed was the balance. My Smith and Wesson .44 is evenly balanced. His Red hawk is very noticeably top heavy. They do that for a reason. To stop the muzzle from going up.
Colion said he used to laugh at a video of a girl firing a Desert Eagle and the barrel recoiled up and hit her in the head. He said now he understands why that happens. That's why the Ruger Red hawk is top heavy. To reduce that muzzle flip.
We've all heard the story of the cop who tried firing a Dessert Eagle for the first time with one hand. It's a semi automatic not a revolver. As soon as he fired one shot the muzzle flip forced it strait up and the recoil cause him to fire a second shot by accident. That recoil caused him to accidentally fire two more shots. He ended up firing one shot down range and three into the ceiling. That was very unsafe.
The moral of the story is if you're firing a Desert Eagle for the first time use both hands and only load one round in the magazine. Especially if you're starting off with a .50 cal.
Double action revolvers are much safer in the sense that because they are double action it's much harder to fire a second or third shot into the ceiling by accident. That's more of a concern with semi automatics.
The Desert Eagle is a very large and heavy pistol. That means in .357 or .44 the weight of the gun would help offset the recoil. A .357 Desert Eagle should be fine. I was at DVC many years ago and they had a Tommy gun converted to single shot. I was surprised at how heavy it was. It fired a .45 but because the firearm was so heavy there was very little recoil and it was surprisingly accurate.
A word on Gun Ownership and Mass Shootings
With all the insane government over reach we've seen there is a lot of push back on gun ownership. Gang members don't use legally obtained registered firearms to commit a crime. They use illegal unregistered firearms. They call them throw aways because they can't be traced so the leave them at the scene. The reason they do that is so they aren't caught with it later on.
Mass shooting are a bit different because it revolves around someone who is mentally unstable. A coworker asked me what's to stop me from using one of my guns if someone pisses me off. My first answer was simple. Legal gun owners are meticulous about the rules because gun ownership is so sacred to them they don't want to lose that privilege.
The example I gave was road rage. I said if I get in a fight with someone I automatically second guess myself because if I was to get charged with assault I'd lose all my guns. I avoid conflict simply because I don't want to lose my guns.
However, after thinking about it there's another reason. What's to stop me from using my guns on someone that's pissed me off? Me. Do you have knives in your home? Have you ever had a desire to fatally stab someone with those knives? What's stopping you? You are.
I've had huge chef knives since I was 19 and I have never had a desire to stab someone with those knives my entire life. Now I will agree guns are a bit different because they are so easy to fire. Fatally stabbing someone is very violent but pulling a trigger is relatively easy. That's why I say you never pick up a firearm in anger. That's why we have safety training.
Control the muzzle. Never point a firearm at someone. Ever. The Americans have a different rule. They say never point a firearm at something you don't intend to kill or destroy. That's a bit excessive but it reinstills the seriousness of pointing a firearm at someone.
I was at the gun store a while ago before the hand gun freeze and I was looking at pistols. I picked one up and sighted it to see how it felt in my hand. Someone working behind the counter walked towards the path of the gun I was holding so I lowered it and asked where's a safe firing direction.
The person behind the counter showing me the gun said point it at me. I know it's unloaded. I just shook my head and said I am not pointing an unloaded firearm at you. I won't do it. That's the way I was trained. Years ago my daughter had a friend over visiting from the States.
She said oh I took that firearm course back home. They taught us when you shoot someone you have to shoot to kill. My daughter and I both looked at each other in shock and I said our firearm training in Canada is a bit different. Control the muzzle, finger off the trigger, always assume the firearm is loaded. Our training is to prevent accidental discharges so we don't kill anyone.
Mass Shooting that are Orchestrated
My coworker was concerned about mass shootings. He said someone did a mass shooting with a handgun in England and they banned handguns. They haven't had a mass shooting since. My first response was I didn't think you were allowed to own guns in England. That's why stabbings are so common.
However, the whole idea of a mass shooting with a handgun is pretty unrealistic. Our pistol magazines are pinned at 10 rounds. Yes you can get over capacity magazine illegally but how many do you have. Revolvers are usually just 5 or 6 rounds and are very slow to reload.
Semi automatic pistols are very fast but once you run out of magazines, reloading a semiautomatic pistol magazine is slower than reloading a revolver.
Steven Seagal once said he thinks many of the mass shootings in the US are orchestrated. So do I. Take the Orlando shooting. There was way too many rounds fired for there to have been just one shooter. It was ridiculous. The guy they claimed did it was a Gay Muslim. Why would a Gay Muslim shoot up a Gay bar he frequented. It didn't make sense. He was just someone they shot and blamed it on.
The only motive for that shooting was gun control. The leftists want to ban the AR 15 so they orchestrated an event to justify banning it. Just like the Nova Scotia mass shooting. Other than gun control that mass shooting had no motive. There were also a dozen other shady things associated with that shooting.
The shooter had been paid a large sum of money from the RCMP. Two plain clothes RCMP officers were caught red handed shooting up a fire hall where civilians were being protected during the lock down. That was obvious.
Then there's that police agent from Nova Scotia who was involved with that fake cartel bust in Edmonton, released early from prison only to help orchestrate the Nova Scotia mass shooting. That whole thing was shady.
Even that bank robbery on Vancouver Island that wasn't a bank robbery. They robbed the bank then waited for the police to arrive to have a shootout with the police. That was bizarre. It made no sense. Gun control was the only motive.
One of the reasons I'm so passionate about gun ownership is because I see the Intelligence community's obsession to remove that right. When I see them orchestrate mass shootings to justify their agenda that makes me very concerned.
Having said that, I realize different people are going to have different opinions. My lawyer friend supports gun control, I do not. He's not my enemy. He's smart and has his own opinion. Nobody likes mass shootings.
My coworker that asked what's stopping me from using my guns on someone that pissed me off. Although he's starting to support Trump and Pierre Poilievre, he's not comfortable with gun ownership because of mass shootings. I respect his opinion.
For me it's important but it's not crazed. I've heard some people say what it's going to take is for some people to get in a shootout with the police when they come to confiscate legally obtained firearms. My response is no it's not. That's exactly what they want. They want some wacko to have a shoot out with the police to justify taking them all away forever.
I believe in the rule of law. If they make a law banning certain firearms I'm going to vote against that law and against any politician who supports that law. I'm not going to shoot a cop for enforcing that law. Aside from target shooting and hunting the purpose of gun ownership is self defense. As Candace Owens said growing up when the racists would shoot at her home, her grandfather would shoot back.
Sailor's rights. Protection of persons and property. If ANTIFA or a mob of lawless thugs start rioting and looting in theory your firearms are to protect your family and property from them. If they riot with the police then we outflank them and support the police. We support law and order.
We never get in a shootout with the police. Ever. Even if the police become corrupt. If the police become corrupt then we surrender our weapons and sue the police. We support law and order. We don't cross that line and endorse crazy. We endorse logic, reason and morality. That is what we endorse.
.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.png)
