So is Julian Assange.
Julian Assange did not reveal sensitive military information that put soldiers at risk. He simply released a video of an extrajudicial murder where innocent civilians were killed. That video is what I want to address because it opens pandora's box.
Recently I saw a movie clip on Netflix of a US president approving a controversial assassination of a suspected terrorist. Not only was he a suspected terrorist, they weren't even sure if that was him. It's a familiar scene we see played out repeatedly. Drone strikes and extra judicial murders have become a method of operation of the CIA and the Pentagon. That is the root of the problem. That slippery slope has led us to where we are today.
According to the fake news, al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri was killed five times.
The mainstream media reported that a US drone strike killed al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri on five seperate ocasions. Assuming that one of those five was him, who were the other four people they killed? We don't know and we never will know. That is the problem with extra judicial murders. It brings us to an examination of the American Revolution compared to a Communist Revolution. I'll be the first to admit that the Americans are very fortunate that George Washington was not chairman Mao or Xi Jinping.
For a politician or military General to hand over power to the people once he has seized it was unprecedented and thus the US Constitution was born.
Let's look at the intent of the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights. A free Republic protects civil liberty by law. A Communist dictatorship does not. Some of the key principles of the US Constitution include free speech, lawful assembly and the freedom of the press. However, it also includes the right to a fair trial, the right to legal representation, protection from unlawful arrest and the freedom from unnecessary searches and seizures. Extrajudicial murders violate every founding principle in the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
There was a reason the founding fathers put that in the Constitution. To prevent the Republic from becoming a tyranny.
The CIA are not oath keepers. They do not support or protect the principles of the US Constitutions. In fact they are the enemies of the State. They are enemies of the free Republic. Not only that but they are also compulsive liars. Their mandate is murder to get gain. They don't oppose Communism like they claim, that's just a front for them to rationalize their means. The end does not justify the means and the CIA's means is Communism. Their means leads to that end. If you walk down the road that leads to Communism that is exactly where you will end up.
It's like torture. Torture is not acceptable at any time. Guantanamo Bay is an abomination as are all of the CIA's black prison sites. They violate the US Constitution and the principles the founding fathers fought for. The CIA claimed to have opposed Communism in Cuba but look at what happened at the Bay of Pigs. They sabotaged their own invasion. I don't think they opposed Communism in Cuba at all. I think they helped it happen. They murdered Che Guevara after the revolution was successful so Fidel Castro wouldn't have a political rival. The end does not justify the means and the end the CIA claims they are fighting for is not what they are really fighting for.
Cia lol zeleszazi trying to start ww3 bombing Poland tisk tisk. Shawn penn for the oscar!ReplyDelete
They truly are an abomination to all that us decent and justReplyDelete
Shaun Penn is a turd, another Hollywood type who loves the spotlight even if he has nothing to offer and does not mind lining up with the wrong folks if people will point a camera in his direction. Let's not forget his support of a murderous regime in Venezuela, because "USA bad". He's always had shit to talk about his own country if it ingratiates him with the woke crowd. Had all his personally owned guns welded into a sculpture to please a woman who dumped him a few months later. A no balls pussy.ReplyDelete
As for the incident with Russian/Ukrainian missiles, who knows, both sides would lie if it got them what they want. Zelensky will say anything at this point, true or not. It actually looks like a new variation of the false flag, one where who is blamed can be left indeterminate until a decision is made which way the winds are blowing. Those who want a wider war vs those who know they are not ready for that yet vs those who don't want one at all.
Even the fake news admitted that Ukraine was responsible for the missile landing in Poland. Now they deny it. That is ridiculous. Just like how they fired a missile at the Russian prisoners. The first casualty of war is the truth.Delete
I don't believe anything I hear from that war anymore. As you say, "truth".ReplyDelete
That said the S-300 is a surface to air system, meaning it would be used to defend against attacking aircraft and missiles. By that understanding it would have to be fired by the Ukrainians as they are the ones on defense here militarily and getting hit by Russian missiles all over. Russian S-300 systems would have to be on the other side or north of the country to be defending against Ukrainian air? Not to mention the Russians have nothing to gain by NATO getting more involved than they are already whereas the Ukraine obviously does. "Send us more". If those things don't hit something they come down somewhere right? Even if they auto destruct the pieces are going to fall.
I can't help thinking we're just one manufactured incident (or a series) away from this spreading. Not as easy to get away with these days I hope. Shouting "false flag" every time something happens actually has the positive aspect of getting people to question if it is or isn't vs. going with the flow. An antidote if you will. "It was a Russian missile" didn't fly. This time.
Yes, that's a good point. It was a defense missile so I can't comprehend how they can now deny it.Delete