I have a few more things to say about the all inclusive gun grab. They've been breaking the rules the whole way. Brad Cathers, the Yukon Party MLA stated that "The right to own firearms is very important to a great many Canadians.”
He went on to say "The past practice in Canada had been that firearms that became illegal due to a change in the law could still be kept by the owners but not resold. The change and the step across the line into what has been called a ‘buyback’ program is, in fact, confiscation and is a major change that is deeply disturbing to many Canadians who value property rights. It’s a gentle-sounding term for what it really is: the forced confiscation of private property. For many Canadians and many Yukoners, the principle of that is not acceptable.” Indeed.
However, this latest all inclusive amendment banning everything under the sun doesn't talk about buy back. It talks about seizing private property. That is not acceptable. In addition to that, the Liberal government is telling court registries not to allow any Section 72 appeals. They're not allowed to do that. The law states in Section 72 and 74 of the Firearms Act that if the government prohibits a legally obtained firearm, people have the right to file a Section 72 appeal in court. The law states we have that right. Justin Trudeau is breaking the law. Again.
We all know that Justin Trudeau is a fake feminist. He's a fake environmentalist and a fake advocate for Aboriginals. He certainly doesn't support Muslims because he refused to acknowledge the Uyghur genocide in Communist China. Now let's turn to the hypocrisy of his new wife, the World Economic Forum in waiting, Jagmeet Singh.
Jagmeet wears a turban but he's not a Sikh. All of his policies mock the Sikh faith. Jagmeet supports the legalization of all drugs. The Sikh temple doesn't support that. Jagmeet supports late term gender based abortions. The Sikh temple doesn't support that. Now Jagmeet is supporting an all inclusive gun ban. Let's take a look at how that position mocks the persecution of Sikhs in India and the historic attack on the Golden Temple.
In 1984 Operation Blue Star was a Sikh Genocide by order of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. The Sikhs in India were being persecuted by their government. They had a stockpile of firearms in the Temple to protect them from the government. The government attacked the Temple with tanks and mortars, seized the firearms and desecrated the Temple killing 17,000–30,000 Sikhs.
Do you really wonder why we don't trust the government? Corrupt governments have murdered far more people with guns than criminals. Jagmeet is betraying that heritage by endorsing this all inclusve gun grab. If Jagmeet really supported the Farmers in India why doesn't he support the Farmers in Canada or Holland? Does his membership in the World Economic Forum forbid it?
Tucker Finally Says It;
ReplyDeleteCovid Policy is a tool of Social Control - for Govt. to strip the most basic human rights & civil liberties from it's citizens;
https://youtu.be/E_fPyew8WiQ?t=103
Perhaps the firearm law is our government testing the water for future property rights violations? What if the government decides owning private real estate no longer seems advantageous? Just saying
ReplyDeleteThat's a very good point. Seizing private property is a very dangerous precedent. The next step is everything you own including your land. Justin Trudeau is a Communist. Communists object to land ownership.
Delete"You'll have nothing and like it".- WEF Founder Klaus Schwab.
ReplyDeleteIn other news, the Dutch government plans to "buy back" (shut down) 3000 Dutch farms "to control nitrogen pollution caused by fertilizers."
Crops don't grow without nitrogen. Ask any biologist. But don't worry, they aren't planning to induce a worldwide famine or anything, even though its probably the easiest and fastest way to cut the planet's population in half as they have said needs to be done.
Exactly. The Dutch government is seizing land for farms because the WEF wants it.
Deletethe Netherlands is one of the largest exporter of food in the world. Reducing the number of farms isn't in the interests of those who eat that food.
ReplyDeleteWhat I suspect that land is being taken for is to increase the amount of housing. There are 18 Million people living in a very small country. Citizens won't agree with using farm land for housing so this may be the governments way of using another "story". Nitrogen pollution, so they want to reduce the amount of food the world has. Not buying it. e.a.f.