Sunday, September 4, 2011

The Ken Brotherston case



I noticed in Jeff Buziak's letter entitled Lawless: Beautiful British Columbia, he mentioned Ken Brotherston's case so I decided to look it up. Jeff Buziak stated the drug problem is so bad now he asked if it is time to take matters into our own hands and cited the Brotherston case. Wow. There's a lot to discuss.

First I'll answer the question then explain why. Is it time to take matters into our own hands? Yes it is, but that does not mean committing murder or perpetuating violence. It means reporting crack dealers and murders to the police.

Ken Brotherston was a city councilman on Vancouver Island. During the trial, for five weeks in November and December, witness after witness at the Victoria courthouse recounted details of life in the gritty drug underworld on the West Shore — how debts were owed, threats were made, drugs changed hands and people got hurt. The information was lurid; the allegations were sensational.

It would appear that the real problem that is not being addressed is the drug problem on the West Shore that is allowed to prosper with little or no interference. On one side we have police frustrated with a judicial system that does virtually nothing to chronic offenders who commit a huge amount of property crime to pay for their drug addiction. On the other side we have extremists lobbying City hall to hand out free crack pipes at the taxpayers expense. This enables the drug problems to fester into a gang war that is spilling over on to the streets.

Ken Brotherston admitted to beating the tar out of a crack dealer. In fact he even brought the crack dealer to the police station in his truck unconscious. The crack dealer never woke up. Some would call Ken Brotherston a hero. Others would call him a criminal. Most would concur he is a vigilante.

The bizarre thing is, he got off. He claimed self defense. He claimed the crack dealer put a gun in his face and he disarmed the crack dealer and beat the tar out of him. The crown argued that the beating went beyond self defense and was excessive. The defence argued the crack dealer kept attacking him in a cocaine psychosis first with a gun, then with a knife. Even when he dropped off the body Brotherston expressed the concern of the crack dealer waking up and possibly freaking out again.

I think this case shows us what our moral responsibility it. No I'm not saying our moral responsibility is to murder crack dealers. Crack dealers are a dime a dozen. The real problem is the people who are supplying the crack dealers and profiting from all that misery and violence. I'm not saying kill all Hells angels either. I'm saying the Hells angels are directly involved in the drug trade on Vancouver Island as well as in East Vancouver, Surrey, Kelowna, Vernon, Kamloops, Prince George and Dawson Creek. The Jones brothers indictment following the Robert Shannon conviction is proof of that.

We need to be honest about that and deal with that otherwise the Hells angels will keep finding new mules who will make them more money. As long as there is that much money to be made, they will fight and kill over the drug profits. I'm not saying legalize all drugs either. That would not stop the problem. It would only make an insanely difficult problem an impossible one.

Personally, I'd say Ken Brotherston is one lucky man. Not because he got way with murder, but because he or his sons weren't killed. Any 12 year old kid can pull a trigger. It would be pretty easy to shoot him dead. He is very lucky someone else present didn't have a gun and shoot him in the back.

I do think it is time to fight back. Police forces are often driven by statistics or should I say funded. Politicians are driven by statistics. They like to be able to report that crime is decreasing. That gives everyone the warm and fuzzy feeling that the police are doing their job. Yet the police can't do their job without the support of the community. That is why some of the younger members of the force are actually concerned about public trust and sincerely want to make things better. How noble.

Getting rid of crack dealers or a crack house is a very difficult thing. Entirely possible but very difficult requiring a consistent vigilant effort. The first step in getting rid of crack dealers is to note license plates and descriptions of those involved and report it to the police. Over and over again. Every time you see them out there selling crack call it in. The squeaky wheel gets the grease.

Forming a block watch helps. Getting a police liaison officer for your block watch helps. The more crime is reported and the more people keep track of file numbers and response times the more the police will be given the resources act upon it. I'm not saying the police don't want to act on the calls. I'm saying by forming a block watch and recording response times to reported crime helps give the police the funding to do their job.

Vancouver City Hall were the ones who closed down the East Vancouver police station at night to suppress crime statistics. Yet suppressing the crime statistics shoots yourself in the foot because it reduces the fund set aside to help with the problem. Vancouver City Hall were also the ones who gave the Hells Angels and extra $2 million from the social housing budget when they over paid for the drake Hotel.

The next step is to get rid of ridiculous programs like handing out free crack pipes. That program of enabling has a profound message. When you hand out a free crack pipe you are telling people smoking crack is OK when it's not. You're telling people stealing to support your crack addiction is OK when it's not. You're telling people it's OK to sell crack where they hand out free crack pipes when it's not.

The Ken Brotherston case shows us it is out more duty to address the drug problem on the West Shore and in each one of our communities. Letting the Hells Angels have a monopoly on the drug trade is clearly not the answer. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The Hells Angels are the ones profiting from the crack plague in Beautiful BC. It may not be the best place on earth but it is still beautiful and it's our home. That makes it worth fighting for. We have no place left to go.

We can't do everything but we can do something. The Lindsay Buziak murder is a shining example of why we have a moral obligation to try.

6 comments:

  1. This guy's getting *off* is not *bizarre*, Agent K. It was the considered verdict of a Judge, with all the evidence before her. It was the right verdict, and I don't have to look behind me to know that most BC'ers agree with me.

    When a bunch of vicious vandals in Surrey were wrecking expensive cars here, a wang-ster shot one dead. All sorts of ridiculous blather from politically-correct types ensued, but from reading the extensive story comments, I can say that, just as I think, everyone felt that vandal had it coming, I DON'T care the bastard got shot. We are so under it here, at the mercy of the gangs, that ANYTHING that smacks of real justice is applauded; it's a symptom of our sorry times.

    As with Brotherstone, people just have to fight back and Block Watch is NOT doing it, that program's been around for years; and during it we've had the huge Gang wars. How does it help? Trailrunner78's comments to Buziak states the only way. You're just too much of a wimp here, Agent K. Remember why the original movie, "Walking Tall," was called that?

    We are used to being no more than *subjects* of the Crown Colonial Government, it's our current-day mind-set too, not the US's concept of a *free* individual with in-alienable rights. There are NO such rights under British Admin. There is no concept of an empowered citizenry here. It's our history and will never change. As a result, the only forlorn hope is a total re-organization of the whole Justice system, Crown, Police, Courts, the works.

    Meanwhile, my only hope is my own willingness to arm myself & defend myself. Winchester Defender, here I come. I've shopped around; its only $395 away from me now. Take a look;

    http://tinyurl.com/3m2woxw

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fair comment. If the crack dealer did pull a gun on him and if the crack dealer then pulled a knife on him and if the crack dealer did indeed keep coming at him, then beating him to death would indeed be self defense. I’m just leery of people taking that case as a get out of jail free card to start taking the law into their own hands.

    I agree the gang member in Surrey who shot the punk vandalizing his car was effective but I would say it was excessive and I wouldn’t condone it. He could have just put one in his leg as a warning first. Yes Block watch has been around a long time but how many people actually utilize it? I have seen communities in many high crime areas pull together and by being vigilant in reporting crime and observing suspicious behavior, successfully transformed their communities. East 42nd street Time square is a prime example. That case wasn’t necessarily the community but that model was based on enforcement not enabling.

    I think we have unalienable rights in Canada too. Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to lawful assembly, equal protection of the law. I think most of these rights are entrenched in the natural justice found in the existing common law. I will agree the US Constitution is a great model to bind the government to support those unalienable rights. Yet we have seen how even in the US of A, their wonderful constitution can be a thing of not unless the people are willing to defend it. Martin Luther King’s dream was that the constitution would be more than just a nice piece of paper hanging on the wall. His dream was that the constitution would actually be implemented and his activism was instrumental in seeing that dream become a reality.

    My concern with the shoot first ask questions later philosophy is what if the gang member shot the wrong kid? What if it was someone else in the group vandalizing cars and someone just said it was him. That’s the whole point of due process. Don’t get me wrong, I like a pump action 12 gauge as much as the next guy. However, there is a time and place for everything. Right now I’m going to give due process and democracy it’s chance. Right now I support the Martin Luther King model. The day may come when I will indeed take up arms and support the Malcolm X model. It’s just that that day has not yet come. Time will tell but we owe it to ourselves, to our children and to democracy itself to give due process it’s chance. We might not like where the other road ends up taking us.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Genesis 9:5-6




    6 “Whoever sheds human blood,
    by humans shall their blood be shed;
    for in the image of God
    has God made mankind."

    End of; Man up.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Further very bad news. A lady who apparently challenged the drug-dealers who are entrenched in MY Surrey high-rise, just had to move, for her life. She got a note under her door saying she was dead and her dog dead if she didn't move house like, right NOW. It's the RS or someone; who knows?

    That's what it's like; living right here right now.

    ReplyDelete
  5. And now Ken's son Greg is in police custody. He punched out a male outside a victoria pub and the victim died in hospital last night

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dope did it of course. A known offender and violent individual involved in his father Ken's action and subsequent murder of a crack addict who allegedly owed him money, he was in the middle of a domestic dispute in the parking lot of a pub when a concerned 59 year old man tried to intervene. One punch ended his life. He was declared brain dead.
    As a former addict myself I hope he doesn't get off. Although I never committed a crime, it is a desperate lifestyle and shouldn't I be a defence or excuse from the realities and consequences of ones actions.

    ReplyDelete