Sunday, March 10, 2013

JJ Truscott is out of his mind

Justice John Truscott has lost his marbles. Perhaps we should put an add in the paper for him. This case is yet another example of what a joke the injustice system in BC has become. Only it’s not funny. John Truscott just acquitted a Surrey trucker who was caught smuggling 114 kilos of cocaine across the boarder in his truck.

The Vancouver Province is reporting that: “On July 19, 2009, Amritpal Singh Narwal was stopped at the Huntingdon (Sumas) border crossing driving a 2003 Kenworth tractor and pulling an apparently empty 1996 commercial trailer. When a border officer inspected the trailer, he observed that washers holding screws to a metal plate on the back of a refrigeration unit appeared scratched, as if the plate had been removed and replaced repeatedly.

Using a screwdriver, he removed one or two screws, peered behind the plate and pulled out two kilograms of cocaine. When the plate was completely removed, it was discovered that the interior of the refrigeration unit had been hollowed out and filled with 144 kilograms of cocaine. At the trial Narwal claimed that he had no knowledge the cocaine was in the trailer and no reason to suspect it was there.

B.C. Supreme Court Justice John Truscott concluded "that whoever loaded the cocaine did it without the accused's knowledge and involvement, so that the accused would not appear nervous at the border or disappear with the cocaine." Come on, that is ridiculous. The border officer noticed that “the washers holding screws to a metal plate on the back of a refrigeration unit appeared scratched, as if the plate had been removed and replaced repeatedly.” Replaced repeatedly. As in it has been done many times before.

“Someone” Hollowed out the refrigeration unit without his knowledge. That’s pretty hard for a driver not to notice. 144 kilos of cocaine takes up a fair amount of space. It’s highly likely that by hollowing out the refer unit, the refrigeration stopped working. That’s kind of hard for a trucker not to notice. On top of that he produced a false delivery bill to cover up the fact that he drove all the way to LA to pick up the cocaine.

This judge is an idiot. This is even worse than the Glen Hehn case where he was caught red handed loading 52 kilos of cocaine from his storage locker onto a truck. He told the judge that he didn’t know what was in the boxes and was helping an associate move. Yeah, what did the associate say was in the boxes? An associate isn’t going to move that much cocaine without the Hells Angels permission.

At least in the Glen Hehn case someone else took the fall and said they did it. In this case no one took the fall and the judge let the guy walk away free. That is crazy. Not much of a deterrent there. This brings us to the misconception that the public are not allowed to criticize judges. The public’s not learned in the law so they can’t understand the law like the judge can. Bullsh*t. We pay their salaries. We elect the governments that make and change the law. The public has a right and a duty to criticize bad decisions that mock justice.

Check out JJ’s rap sheet: Police received a call about someone tied up on a person’s property. The police responded to the call and found a grow op on site. JJ threw out the evidence because he said the call claiming someone was tied up inside was bizarre and contained little rational information suggesting someone was in danger. He said “In my view, when the two constables went to the address and spoke to the accused at the front gate and were told that there was no one tied up at that residence, they should have accepted that and left,”

JJ must be on crack. Do you really think if they had someone tied up inside that they would tell the police about it? Do you really think if the police went to a crack house in Prince George and said Hey, do you have anyone chained up in your basement that you’re torturing? No? OK, thanks. That’s good enough for us. That would be irresponsible and negligent.

Yes warrantless searches are a concern. Yet dismissing a 911 call claiming someone is tied up inside being held captive because it sounds crazy is absurd. Stranger things happen every day.

In fact, this egomaniac even overruled a city bylaw to allow an addiction treatment centre in effect banning the treatment centre. Supreme Court Justice John Truscott found the bylaw was inconsistent with the city's official community plan (OCP) and therefore contrary to the Local Government Act.

"In my view, in order to authorize this recovery facility on this site, city council will be required to amend the OCP," Truscott wrote in a reasons for judgment. Council adopted the bylaw in December 2011 to allow the creation of a 30-bed Northern Supportive Recovery Centre for Women at the now-closed school. JJ shut it down. He was way out of his jurisdiction.

In fact, JJ even acquitted a man for assaulting a peace officer even though a witness saw him and he was convicted. Instead of ordering a retrial, which there was no basis for, he acquitted the man and set him free. JJ said the witness who testified to seeing the suspect wrestling with the police officer, was 40 or 50 meters away and wore a hearing aid. He saw the suspect wrestling with the police officer which supported the police officer’s testimony. He didn’t have to hear anything. He saw it. Wearing a hearing aid isn’t relevant.

JJ said the key issue in acquitting the man after another judge found him guilty was because the previous judge said he had no great confidence in Mr. Briscoe’s version rather than stating that he had no confidence in the accused’s version of events since it contradicted the police officer’s version and another independent witness. “To say that he had no great confidence is to suggest that he still had some confidence” which means there was reasonable doubt. He was being nice. He had no confidence in the accused’s version because it contradicted the evidence. Idiot!

This is a pattern of insanity. John Truscott needs a psychiatric evaluation before he returns to the bench. He is clearly a danger to society in that position.


  1. If you are going to commit a crime in Canada or BC, make it a biggie and the system will work for you. The justice system is anything but lenient for Joe Average who may have had a minor indiscretion with the legal system. Just look at some of the ruling in the media; how the hell can we justify impounding someones vehicle for speeding or having a couple of beers and the associated costs and fines when someone who actually KILLS someone gets a fine and a couple year driving ban?? The BC Judiciary should be taken over by the federal government, repaired and replaced, if not, at minimum the judges should be replaced with a well written software program overseen by a civilian board.

  2. Indeed. Seizing your car after two drinks compared to this is a prime example.

  3. The spirit of Team 3 is alive in Toronto;

    "Judge criticizes Toronto police officer, but clears him of assaulting man during raid."

    "She acquitted Const. Gerrard Arulanandam of assault causing bodily harm and uttering threats against Shayne Fisher, 29, a carpenter with no criminal record."

    "Seven officers rammed the door of the third-floor Lawrence Ave. W. apartment on June 7, 2006, executing a search warrant for drugs."

    "Fisher testified he was just visiting a friend there. But he suffered a fractured rib, perforated eardrum and badly swollen eye."

    "The judge found “inherently incredible” police testimony that Fisher and two other men violently resisted arrest. “It defies credibility that three men would run at seven armed police officers in a situation of this kind.”

    "She noted no one charged Fisher with assaulting police or resisting arrest."

    "The officers testified they did not notice blood in the apartment, though photos show it was obvious, the judge said."

    "More than 50 police officers in civilian clothes packed the University Ave. courtroom to hear the verdict. Arulanandam, 37, hugged several afterwards, while others slapped his back."

    "Fisher said while he was a “little” disappointed, he “didn’t expect much. The big wall of blue was there. I told the truth since I was arrested.” (Star)

    The fact of the support of this; from over fifty other Police Officers; should tell every citizen a great deal about our Police.

  4. "Victim of unprovoked dog bite sues Mounties."

    "A B.C. man who was mistaken for a criminal and mauled by a police dog sued the RCMP for damages Friday, as another victim came forward demanding changes to police dog training."

    "Bill Evanow, a Maple Ridge caterer, says he still can’t walk properly after the police dog removed a chunk of his hamstring. Evanow claims the RCMP was negligent in its deployment and training of the dog."

    “With the current deployment and training, we think this could happen to anybody,” said Evanow’s lawyer Doug King of the Pivot Legal Society. “He was simply in the wrong place at the wrong time.” (CTV)

    Please look at the photos of the horrible injuries this guy suffered, before dismissing this story.


Comments are moderated so there will be a delay before they appear on the blog.