Saturday, April 27, 2013

False flag attacks



One for the road before we get back to local gang stuff. I’ll tell you why we have to talk about false flag attacks. A) Hitler used them twice to start the second world war and B) Other administrations have used them in our day. Hitler burned the German parliament building and blamed it on terrorists so he could get the powers of a chancellor. Then he burned a German radio station and blamed it on Poland to justify invading Poland. False flag attacks have been used before.

Someone said to me the other day they watched a show about a conspiracy theory regarding 9/11 and they debunked all of it. No they didn’t. I told the person you can’t debunk Operation Northwoods. That document is a historical fact. He didn’t know what Operation Northwoods was. Exactly. You can’t say the 9/11 truth movement is wrong if you’ve never looked into Operation Northwoods. You can just say you don’t care.

Someone said to me they don’t care about what happened 50 years ago. That is foolish and offensive. That’s like saying you don’t care about the Vietnam War or the holocaust because it happened a long time ago. History repeats itself until we learn from it.

We need to talk about Northwoods over and over again. We need to talk about how that insane plan got so far to make sure it never happens again. We need to talk about how that plan wasn’t just proposed it was actually implemented in Europe as Operation Gladio. No dope smoking hippie made that up.

We need to talk about Northwoods because it was implemented during the Six Day war on the USS Liberty. Instead of shouting remember the Maine which most likely was another false flag attack we need to remember the USS Liberty. We need to remember the fact that President Johnston recalled the air support for the USS Liberty when it was under attack because he wanted that vessel sunk. The only thing that saved them was a Russian spy ship that witnessed the fraud. Recalling the air support was a huge betrayal of the public trust.

There are two issues at the heart of 9/11. The history and the science clearly points to the possibility of it being a false flag attack. The science is very simple. Debunkers argue that the traces of thermite found in the 9/11 ruble could be explained by chalk. No it can’t. The 9/11 commission said the third tower collapsed at freefall speed due to heat and fire. No it didn’t. A steel framed tower doesn’t do that from fire. The only way a steel frame tower can collapse at freefall speed is if the load bearing beams are blown out at the same time. You can claim terrorists must have put explosives in the load bearing beams before the attack and I will have to agree. But you can’t say the towers fell at freefall speed from two and no planes hitting them. That doesn’t fit the science. The Shanghai apartment fire in 2010 was much worse yet it did not collapse at all let alone at freefall speed.

Iraq was a huge mess. It was invaded based on a lie. A premeditated lie MI 6 gave to the media under Operation Mass appeal. Another huge concern about Iraq was the two British SAS agents who were caught with a car loaded with guns and explosives dressed as Arabs who instead of stopping for a police checkpoint, murdered the allies before surrendering. Instead of explaining what secret mission they were on, England leveled the jail they were detained in and broke them out without a trial.



We still need to ask ourselves what on earth were they doing with a car load of weapons and explosives dressed as Arabs? We cannot believe they were on a sting operation trying to catch terrorists. As soon as a real terrorist got close to them they would have recognized the disguise. I submit that there is only one logical explanation as to what they were doing. It fits in with the perpetual use of false flag attacks.

Obviously not every act of terrorism is a false flag attack yet many of them are and that is something we need to discuss. Especially if the are going to throw away the Charter of Rights and take away our civil liberties.

8 comments:

  1. Or for that matter, how a jet liner can apparently vaporize, leaving not a trace of luggage, seats, debris or bodies for that matter at the Pentagon. All fitting into a neat little hole with no signs of the wings damaging the building. For a building that is defended by god knows what and criss-crossed by CCTV coverage, we are only shown snippets of coverage. And it it sure as hell doesn't show a jet liner, that magically descended from the sky on impossible flight pattern by a pilot who couldn't even fly a Cesna let alone a jet liner. BS! It was a Global Hawk. The US attacked itself and I am sure there is some panic going on about finding this piece of landing gear as there surely is identifiable serial #'s that will indicate it as being a US military aircraft. We have all been fooled into believing this and if you don't believe it then you are with them. (The T word).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good point. The movie Loose Change 9/11 brought up some of the other inconsistencies that happened on that day. As you mention the Pentagon incident was filled with inconsistencies. The hole that the “plane” made that crashed into the Pentagon was a round hole. There was no sign of the wings impact or remnants of the wings at all. It was physically impossible for a skilled pilot to make that kind of turn and fly in at that trajectory without leaving any kind of marks on the ground. We saw a plane hit the Twin towers but it clearly appears that a missile not a plane hit the Pentagon: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDx1GLqvBO8

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with what you're saying here. But what can anyone do about it?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I really think raising public awareness is the first step. I had no idea until a few years ago that false flag attacks were proposed and used. Since people are pretty stubborn the real first step is to educate ourselves and open our own eyes. Not being fooled by them is important. That means not voting for the new laws that destroy the Charter of Rights and not voting for the politicians who do support that. I know the Vancouver 9/11 truth movement hand out information outside the Vancouver Art gallery on the 11thof each month. If 9/11 was an inside job, that would be pretty important to talk about.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What do you think of the judy hall explanation for 9/11???

    ReplyDelete
  6. I haven't heard of her but will check it out. Personally I think it's pretty simple. The towers fell at free fall speed just like a controlled demolition. The only way that can happen is if the load bearing beams are simultaneously blow out so the tower doesn't meet any resistance as it collapses. All the other models of that happening that we do have are controlled demolitions.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sorry it is dr judy wood.. not 'hall...here is a link to her theroy http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fg31AYRYKUA

    But before you watch it you got to understand 'the hutchison effect' you can read www.hutchisoneffect.ca or youtube.
    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FUCd-DVLoRY

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yeah that's a little bit weird for me. It's like the nuclear bomb theory. The towers fell just like a controlled demolition. You don't need a nuclear explosion to create a controlled demolition.

    ReplyDelete